dark light

moocher

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 196 through 210 (of 314 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: General Discussion #341268
    moocher
    Participant

    I have finally had enough!

    Tony Blair has finally realised we have been destroying the enviroment for the last 100 years or so and thinks it’s time to get it sorted.

    Fine.

    We need to use less and recycle more.

    Fine.

    This and sorting out problems will cost money.

    Naturally.

    Each individual in this country should pay £1700+ per year to help fund this.

    Err, unless I’m very much mistaken aren’t the worlds problems the problem of the world?

    Haven’t America, Russia, South America, China, Australia etc contibuted largely to these problems?

    Then why do I personally have to contibute 2 months wages towards sorting out the worlds problems without any choice?

    I bet Tony Blair doesn’t…! 😡

    You can’t see much when you’ve got your head up Prime Minister Bushes ****.

    mick ellis (this is for those who don’t like me) the rest call me, mick

    in reply to: HE'LL save the world WE'LL pay! #1941961
    moocher
    Participant

    I have finally had enough!

    Tony Blair has finally realised we have been destroying the enviroment for the last 100 years or so and thinks it’s time to get it sorted.

    Fine.

    We need to use less and recycle more.

    Fine.

    This and sorting out problems will cost money.

    Naturally.

    Each individual in this country should pay £1700+ per year to help fund this.

    Err, unless I’m very much mistaken aren’t the worlds problems the problem of the world?

    Haven’t America, Russia, South America, China, Australia etc contibuted largely to these problems?

    Then why do I personally have to contibute 2 months wages towards sorting out the worlds problems without any choice?

    I bet Tony Blair doesn’t…! 😡

    You can’t see much when you’ve got your head up Prime Minister Bushes ****.

    mick ellis (this is for those who don’t like me) the rest call me, mick

    in reply to: General Discussion #341273
    moocher
    Participant

    I have finally had enough!

    Tony Blair has finally realised we have been destroying the enviroment for the last 100 years or so and thinks it’s time to get it sorted.

    Fine.

    We need to use less and recycle more.

    Fine.

    This and sorting out problems will cost money.

    Naturally.

    Each individual in this country should pay £1700+ per year to help fund this.

    Err, unless I’m very much mistaken aren’t the worlds problems the problem of the world?

    Haven’t America, Russia, South America, China, Australia etc contibuted largely to these problems?

    Then why do I personally have to contibute 2 months wages towards sorting out the worlds problems without any choice?

    I bet Tony Blair doesn’t…! 😡

    You can’t sat that, President Blair will have you strung up. Don’t you know it’s all our fault (You & me). It’s got **** all to do with the rest of the world. You poor misguided fool. You’l be telling me prisoners have rights next and theres no imigration problems.

    mick ellis (this is for those who don’t like me) the rest call me, mick

    in reply to: HE'LL save the world WE'LL pay! #1941964
    moocher
    Participant

    I have finally had enough!

    Tony Blair has finally realised we have been destroying the enviroment for the last 100 years or so and thinks it’s time to get it sorted.

    Fine.

    We need to use less and recycle more.

    Fine.

    This and sorting out problems will cost money.

    Naturally.

    Each individual in this country should pay £1700+ per year to help fund this.

    Err, unless I’m very much mistaken aren’t the worlds problems the problem of the world?

    Haven’t America, Russia, South America, China, Australia etc contibuted largely to these problems?

    Then why do I personally have to contibute 2 months wages towards sorting out the worlds problems without any choice?

    I bet Tony Blair doesn’t…! 😡

    You can’t sat that, President Blair will have you strung up. Don’t you know it’s all our fault (You & me). It’s got **** all to do with the rest of the world. You poor misguided fool. You’l be telling me prisoners have rights next and theres no imigration problems.

    mick ellis (this is for those who don’t like me) the rest call me, mick

    in reply to: Unbelievable #1302370
    moocher
    Participant

    Catch them, then chop off their hands. Lets see the low life scum steal something then!! No matter where they come from!! 😡

    Got my vote, or its in my manifesto ( did i spell that right)

    mick

    in reply to: General Discussion #341482
    moocher
    Participant

    Moocher: if you can’t make your point without insulting others, then you’ve lost the argument by default.

    In this forum we show respect for those whose opinions differ from our own, even when we disagree strongly.

    Please bear this in mind in the future.

    Thanks

    GA

    I assume the truth hurts, more people than i thought, there are more people think the way i do think the way you do, it wan’t insulting it was passionate statement.
    I won’t appologise, I stand by everything I said, more normal tax paying hard working people need to stand up against these “Tree hugging faggots” who seem to think, a pat on the back and a few grand will make things better. A good hard **** kicking, if that doesn’t work, a lead injection behind the left ear will suffice. Get these scumbags of the planet, I’m sick of wastingmy money on them.

    mick eliis happy again

    in reply to: What is this country coming to ? #1942033
    moocher
    Participant

    Moocher: if you can’t make your point without insulting others, then you’ve lost the argument by default.

    In this forum we show respect for those whose opinions differ from our own, even when we disagree strongly.

    Please bear this in mind in the future.

    Thanks

    GA

    I assume the truth hurts, more people than i thought, there are more people think the way i do think the way you do, it wan’t insulting it was passionate statement.
    I won’t appologise, I stand by everything I said, more normal tax paying hard working people need to stand up against these “Tree hugging faggots” who seem to think, a pat on the back and a few grand will make things better. A good hard **** kicking, if that doesn’t work, a lead injection behind the left ear will suffice. Get these scumbags of the planet, I’m sick of wastingmy money on them.

    mick eliis happy again

    in reply to: General Discussion #341684
    moocher
    Participant

    Okay.

    I’ll play Devil’s Advocate. It is clear that none of you know anything about drugs, the ways in which people come off drugs and the way in which these 198 were ‘abused’ in the way they were forced to come off drugs.

    While being taken off the drugs in the way they were these prisoners would be under medical care. The first tenet of the Hipocratic oath is ‘do no harm.’ These prisoners have obviously argued successfully that harm was done to them by the forced withdrawal from their addiction.

    So, let’s take a smoker. We take their fags and offer them a nicotine substitute. Then we take everything away and say get on with it. Would be exactly the same result. The whole point is that the Prison Authorities should have realised that the manner in which drugs were withdrawn was fundamentally flawed and in today’s litiginous society we can hardly expect any other outcome than a successful claim by those affected.

    At the end of the day, British Law is such that whatever the crime committed by those in prison, they are entitled to be treated with decency and the Prison Service has a duty of care to them. That duty of care was breached.

    Unpalatable as it may seem, these prisoners have a valid point.

    Regards,

    kev35

    Point 1 – They have no rights, they gave those up when they broke the law.

    Point 2 – The human rights act is not for the use of decent law abiding citizens.

    Point 3 – Most smokers don’t comit a crime to feed the addict.

    Until the ******s in Downing Street repeal “The Human Rights Act” you and me will be footing the bill for these scumbags. I didn’t vote for the introduction of the human rights act, I have’nt voted full stop for years, there’s nothing to vote for until they put “No Confidence in any Political party” box on the ballot paper. Be they, Red, Green, Blue or BNP they don’t give a flying **** for all of us hard working individuals out here in the real world. Until the silent masses start shouting as loud as the bleeding heart do gooders who don’t go out to work were stuck with this ****.

    angry mick

    in reply to: What is this country coming to ? #1942099
    moocher
    Participant

    Okay.

    I’ll play Devil’s Advocate. It is clear that none of you know anything about drugs, the ways in which people come off drugs and the way in which these 198 were ‘abused’ in the way they were forced to come off drugs.

    While being taken off the drugs in the way they were these prisoners would be under medical care. The first tenet of the Hipocratic oath is ‘do no harm.’ These prisoners have obviously argued successfully that harm was done to them by the forced withdrawal from their addiction.

    So, let’s take a smoker. We take their fags and offer them a nicotine substitute. Then we take everything away and say get on with it. Would be exactly the same result. The whole point is that the Prison Authorities should have realised that the manner in which drugs were withdrawn was fundamentally flawed and in today’s litiginous society we can hardly expect any other outcome than a successful claim by those affected.

    At the end of the day, British Law is such that whatever the crime committed by those in prison, they are entitled to be treated with decency and the Prison Service has a duty of care to them. That duty of care was breached.

    Unpalatable as it may seem, these prisoners have a valid point.

    Regards,

    kev35

    Point 1 – They have no rights, they gave those up when they broke the law.

    Point 2 – The human rights act is not for the use of decent law abiding citizens.

    Point 3 – Most smokers don’t comit a crime to feed the addict.

    Until the ******s in Downing Street repeal “The Human Rights Act” you and me will be footing the bill for these scumbags. I didn’t vote for the introduction of the human rights act, I have’nt voted full stop for years, there’s nothing to vote for until they put “No Confidence in any Political party” box on the ballot paper. Be they, Red, Green, Blue or BNP they don’t give a flying **** for all of us hard working individuals out here in the real world. Until the silent masses start shouting as loud as the bleeding heart do gooders who don’t go out to work were stuck with this ****.

    angry mick

    in reply to: Unbelievable #1304445
    moocher
    Participant

    Bloody well said moocher !!!
    If they catch the thieving gits how about sticking a big pole where the sun don’t shine and put them up on display in a public place??? :diablo:

    To coin a phrase ( if that’s ok Moocher) ‘thats not very pc is it, political correctness can **** off as well.’ :p :p :p

    Richy.

    You carry on mate, perhaps if enough of us say it out loud the deaf ********s in downing Street will hear us and do something about it – better still put those tossers on a pole as well, Guy Fawkes had the right idea,

    angry mick strikes again

    in reply to: Unbelievable #1304804
    moocher
    Participant

    The easiest way is to get the spineless twats in downing street to repeal the human rights law, that way when any of these ******s are caught we can legaly kick the **** out of them – oh i’m so sorry, thats not very pc is it, political correctness can **** off as well.

    a pissed off mick

    in reply to: New Wheels for BBMF Spits #1308668
    moocher
    Participant

    If the MoD apply their normal terms of business, when they pay for development they expect a license fee from the use of that design elsewhere

    If the MoD apply their normal terms of business – they’ll get a second rate job at twice the cost and it won’t ****in work when they eventually do get it.

    mick

    in reply to: New Wheels for BBMF Spits #1308853
    moocher
    Participant

    The bottom line here is that Dunlop no longer make tubes the sub contractor they used has gone bust, they have also binned any remaining valves so we cannot even adapt alternative tubes. I have been trying to sort this out for years you cannot get tubes for 10.25 and 12 inch main wheels or for Hurricane and Spifire tail wheels although there is at least an alternative for the Spit tail tube.
    If you think this is bad news brake bags are the next item that are going to cause problems.

    In my experience if we the BBMF go tubeless and it works the CAA will not have a problem with others following our lead.

    Mark a 10.25x 7.5 tube costs £323

    Agh, but don’t forget the queens paying so the decimal point will have moved 😀

    in reply to: Interview with Richard Grace #393144
    moocher
    Participant

    I can give him a list of things and people I’d like him to shoot down, what a great attitude to have though, “I’m not going to fly it because people expect me to, I’m going to fly it when I’m confident I can do it correctly and safley.”
    Top bloke for having that attitude.

    mick

    in reply to: Assistance required in identifying a spitfire spinner #1316044
    moocher
    Participant

    Thats right, they are.

    3 blades go one way, and another 3 behind go the other way = counter rotating !

    Counter rotating is where the propeller on one engine goes clockwise and the other engine goes anticlockwise ala d h hornet with merlin 130 & 131s therefore having no tourque effect .

    mick

Viewing 15 posts - 196 through 210 (of 314 total)