Shack front spinner..
mick
So much for freedom of speech !
mick
So much for freedom of speech !
mick
Rumor on the web has it that she is being scrapped now?
About bloody time
mick
Not saying it was just suggesting it may have been. I would not point the finger if it was, because of their shape it is easy to underestimate the space an aircraft will take up
No it isn’t, not if you understand how aircraft move on the ground and how to position them. Any way they should have had enough practice over the years.
All you need to take into account is swept wing growth, pivot point overhang, wing tip hight, tail hight, nose clearance to ground and maximum turning radius and there you go, simple…..
mick
I think they should try to get as much for it as they can, the poor British tax payer gets screwed over enough as it is….
Fair comment, I sick of my taxes being squandered, give it to me if they like, I’ll break it up and sell it for scrap to get some of my money back.
mick
No External difference whatsoever.
B26 Marauders at Willingale
Have been following this thread with interest as my father-in-law is an Ongar boy, and has fond memories of Chipping Ongar from the day the Americans arrived to build it. As a 10 year old boy he spent many hours mixing with the airmen and their machines. His older sister married one of the airmen based there. He witnessed many crashes, and was often first on the scene, due to his well practiced pedal power! He is full of stories of sitting on the fence at the end of the runway watching fully laden B26’s take off, despite being in his 70’s. He is still very familiar with the area and the layout of the airfield. If you need any additional information, I’m sure his would be a good brain to pick!
p.s He was involved in the museum at Blake Hall for a short time, but this has now closed permanently, and the contents disposed of (much of it to Debach and various collectors).
A view expressed by a friend over here in the US a couple of weeks ago is that he’d rather have his recently-restored vintage aircraft tested by a high-time taildragger / vintage pilot, who has many hours on similar types (although not necessarily the exact type to be tested) than a military-trained test pilot, with high hours predominantly on fast jets, and often with an ego to match the ‘test pilot’ tag.
One well-known vintage aircraft engineer in the UK has on several occasions bemoaned to me the number of vintage aircraft bent by ‘test pilots’ over the years.
This is just the point I’m trying to make.
I only have 31 years hands on & legislation in aviation, with only 20 years on historics. Perhaps I need more time on type?
mick
Confused
What is the article in Flyer magazine, about CAA test pilot’s all about anyway. I can’t say I’ve seen it. Has anybody got any details on the aformentioned article or have a copy I can read.
mick
Hope its not serious –
Nothing like being late on parade.
I’ve just read this post and I hope the aeroplane isn’t to badly damaged, when I saw it, last week I think at Duxford, it looked beautiful.
After reading the previous posts in this thread I’m more than a little confused,
had the aeroplane got it’s C of A or was it still undergoing test flights, was a CAA test pilot undertaking these flights, or even the flight on which the incident occured, what damage has the aeroplane sustained. If it nosed over I should think despite the obvious re-shaped prop the engine would need a shock load inspection at the very least.
I must say, I have to take issue on one point made regarding “Test pilots” and their experience. They can have all the experience in the world, but if its not on type, they’re no better than the rest of us, a number of very experienced test pilots have bent some very precious aeroplanes over the last 15 – 20 years or so, lets not put them on a pedastal.
I do hope what ever has happened to this aeroplane come to light, all of us in the industry can learn from others mistakes, it takes a big man (or woman) to admit he (or she) was at fault. it’s a really nice aeroplane, I hope it won’t be out of action for to long
As Beaufighter VI mentioned in the last post,
“Originally Posted by jiffyjoffyjaffy —-
Hi – definately no CAA invovlement in this incident.”
” Welcome to the forum and thanks for confirming the incident. Tell us more!”
mick
Thats topped up the MOD pension fund then…..
And a bit left for Blairs folly in Iraq.
mick
Carolyn Grace & ML407 at Old Warden Yesterday





now if I was multiskilled!!!!!!!!
Loose-Head
By the way hope you don’t mind the picture is now my desktop. Don’t get many of me at work!!!!!!
“don’t get many” this is it …………….
As I said, “panels” expert. Once panel off hand over job to engine expert.
you slack **** –