dark light

Matt-100

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 14 posts - 601 through 614 (of 614 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Airbus A380 At 50 #534365
    Matt-100
    Participant

    I never compared the sales of the A380 to the 787. Not sure how anyone could claim that I did

    Ship 741: The market for A 380 has proved much much smaller than what Airbus had predicted. The comparison with 787 which sold 800 planes in 3-4 years is ridiculous.

    I’ve highlighted the appropriate text in bold for you 😉

    EDIT: I think there’s been some confusion, I was referring to Merlin2’s comment – not yours Ship 741 🙂

    in reply to: Iran Air Pilot Launches Campaign Against Aviation Sanctions #534390
    Matt-100
    Participant

    Iran can’t pick and choose which trade restriction to abide by to suite their own needs. If they could, then there would be no point having any trade embargos at all… I’m sure this is also the politician’s stance on Iran’s trade restrictions.

    Let’s remember, it’s not us Western countries that are in the wrong – it’s Iran… Like I said, if they want spare parts all they need do is abandon their nuclear program.

    It’s the Iran government that are stopping spare parts getting through to Iran Air, not us – they have only themselves to blame. (I don’t see any other civil democratic countries with spare part restrictions)

    in reply to: Airbus A380 At 50 #534534
    Matt-100
    Participant

    Ship 741: The market for A 380 has proved much much smaller than what Airbus had predicted. The comparison with 787 which sold 800 planes in 3-4 years is ridiculous.

    The A380 was never going to sell as many frames as the 787… The same as the 747 was never going to sell as well as the 737.
    Bigger aircraft are less likely to sell than smaller, cheaper, ones.

    In fact, you could argue that that the market for single-deck twin-aisles is far smaller than Boeing predicted.
    Boeing originally forecast they would need to sell 1,100 787s to break even – this has subsequently risen to 1,500 and may rise further still.
    At least Airbus managed to meet their original break-even forecast.

    in reply to: Is UK air tax extortionate? #534540
    Matt-100
    Participant

    £5,994 / 1.91 = ~3,100USG or ~9.5T fuel

    The A320 when fully fuelled takes 6,303USG / 18.7T of fuel.

    It doesn’t take a half fuel load to go from MAN->LHR.

    EDIT – Just realised that the £37.00 fuel surcharge was for both outbound and inbound flight. Still, fuel surcharge covers the cost of the fuel if all seats filled.

    Well as you say that’s for both outbound and inbound.

    As we can see from the BA information provided at the top of the page, the outbound flight is 50 minutes, the inbound is 1hr.

    Accumulated total so far = 1:50 hrs

    Each flight needs enough fuel to divert to the alternate airport, let’s say the two alternate airports are Gatwick (outbound) and Leeds (inbound)…. Say it takes 15 minutes to get to both from the intended arrival airports = 30 minutes.

    Accumulated total so far = 2:20 hrs

    On top of the fuel required to divert to the alternate airport, each flight must carry a minimum of 45 minutes extra fuel – to account for circling, weather delays, holding etc. 45 minutes outbound and inbound = 1:30 hrs

    Accumulated total so far = 3:50 hrs… And suddenly you’re very close to half the maximum endurance of the aircraft (hence why the passengers pay for a 1/2 fuel load).

    On short flights the majority of fuel on-board the aircraft will be legal limit reserves.

    in reply to: Iran Air Pilot Launches Campaign Against Aviation Sanctions #534559
    Matt-100
    Participant

    I hope there aren’t any ‘easing on the pressures facing airlines in Iran’…

    Let’s just take a step back and look at why Iran has sanctions in the first place; Iran is, as I’m sure you’re aware, in the process of developing nuclear weapons. With Iran having an unstable government, there’s no telling if these weapons are just for deterrence. I’m sure the last thing anyone wants is to wake up in the morning to see a nuked Israel on page 1 of the papers.

    If Iran wants the spare parts so badly, all it has to do is abandon its nuclear program.

    In fact an Iran Air crash might even put pressure on the Iran government to abandon the program, to allow vital spare parts through to the airlines. So I’m really against any easing of pressures.

    in reply to: 1st class passengers refuse business class PJs #534563
    Matt-100
    Participant

    Unlike pyjamas, good manners and courtesy cost nothing.

    Where in the article does it say the customers were rude to anyone?

    in reply to: 1st class passengers refuse business class PJs #534590
    Matt-100
    Participant

    This kind of arrogance is typical of those who wildly overestimate their importance in the great sheme of things.

    According to a Qantas statement the two customers (Dr Peter and Mrs Ann Hart) “are extremely loyal and frequent flyers with Qantas and we will be making sure that everything is as it should be next time they fly with us.”

    ‘Extremely loyal and frequent flyers’ suggests to me these are two customers Qantas don’t want to lose – most likely spending tens, even hundreds of thousands of dollars a year in the company.

    If I was spending that much in a single airline, I too would expect in-stock pyjamas, and if I was spending hundreds of thousands of dollars a year in an airline – I wouldn’t overestimate my importance, I’d know the airline should be falling head over heals for me anyway.

    in reply to: Is UK air tax extortionate? #534716
    Matt-100
    Participant

    26.00+34.10+60.10 = £120.2

    Something doesn’t add up.

    The £60.10 is the total tax+charges (£26 + £34.10)

    in reply to: Airbus A380 At 50 #534736
    Matt-100
    Participant

    if there is such a market, why aren’t more A380’s selling?

    Global recession, perhaps? Don’t forget, sales for the 787 have also stalled in the past 5 years. (Boeing have sold a net total of 42 in the past 5 years… To put that in perspective, in the past 5 years – airbus have sold a net total of 68 A380s)

    in reply to: Airbus A380 At 50 #534774
    Matt-100
    Participant

    The fact of the matter is that world air travel markets are fragmenting, and gateway hubs are being bypassed more and more all the time……thus obviating the need for VLA’s. If, and when, this trend changes, a new airplane will be built by a competitor and the A380 will represent out-dated technology, as the design is already over ten years old.

    Are gateway hubs fragmenting? I’m from the UK, so I’ll use here as an example. If you want to fly from the UK to anywhere outside of Europe, the only viable option is LHR. LGW’s been making headway on international routes in recent years, but only due to capacity constraints at LHR. I find it highly unlikely that you will ever be able to fly direct from Glasgow to Tokyo or Hong Kong, meaning there will always be a need for gateway hubs.

    The design may already be 10 years old, but that doesn’t make it outdated. When the 747-400 first flew, the 747 design was 22 years old… The A320 design is 28 years old.

    in reply to: Airbus A380 At 50 #534911
    Matt-100
    Participant

    I would like to see some of the big US airlines order some, but I suspect that’s not going to happen any time soon.

    I think the fact AA only just recently ordered the 77W (to become the first US 77W customer) says a lot about the US airlines in general.
    Despite the good old American ethos of ‘bigger is better’, this quite clearly doesn’t follow trough when it comes to airliners. If one airline can only just get its act together to order the 77W, an A380 order is years off.

    ————————————————————–

    I’m a believer in the A380’s future success. Take the 747, for example. In the first 10 years after its launch (1966-1976), it had only sold 286 frames (most of which were for a single customer, PanAm)… Sound familiar?

    The fact of the matter is this – the long term trend of oil prices is only going one way, and that’s up! Sooner or later, or more likely a slow progression over the next few decades, passengers will care less about frequency and more about price when it comes to booking tickets. When that day comes, the A380 will rule.

    in reply to: Needles, sandwiches, Amsterdam, Gate Gourmet and Delta #536525
    Matt-100
    Participant

    To be honest, I’m starting to wonder if the whole thing was just one big compensation claims scam.

    According to ABC news, a father and his teenage son both travelling on separate Delta Air Lines flights to the US both reported “minor injuries” after biting into said sandwiches. The teenager has refused to hand the needle in question over to authorities citing he needs it as “evidence in a pending law suit”.

    I guess all will become clear in the fullness of time?

    Matt-100
    Participant

    Indeed, Richard Branson is one of the great industry self-publicists along with the likes of Michael O’Leary. Most of the stuff he comes out with is just hot air. But, from a business perspective, a 2017 launch of a new European airline would be a shrewd move.

    By then a lot of competition would have been siphoned off due to the aftershocks of the global down turn.

    Virgin America has already taken the US by storm, with average load factors hitting upwards of 90% on domestic flights. This success (in such a tough economic climate) can be contributed to the unique, modern, and novel in-flight experience.
    Europe doesn’t have any airline with the same unique style as Virgin America. PTV’s/mood lighting/recaro seating, though costly, certainly get bums on seats (especially when you’re the only one doing it).
    The high load factors ultimately subsidize the cost of the PTV systems, so the additional costs transferred to the passenger are negligible.
    I don’t know about anyone else but I’d certainly give a European Virgin America style airline a go?

    You mention Skytrax, so, let’s look at Skytrax. Virgin America and Australia both have a customer rating double that of Virgin Atlantic. Whilst VS has declined in recent years, there’s no denying the new regional Virgin airlines are a cut above the rest.

    in reply to: TU-154 crash in 2010. #536693
    Matt-100
    Participant

    This really is a great story. There are a few videos of the incident on youtube that may be of interest;

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hzWCmyGqulQ

    Funny how the reporter states “Alrosa Airlines, which owns the plane, says it wasn’t aware of any issues before take-off – but added it would never fly it again”… I assume the ‘it’ is the plane? 😛

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ks257PVk-4

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=Si3UI0mIyQM

Viewing 14 posts - 601 through 614 (of 614 total)