dark light

YellowSun

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 105 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: SLAM-ER Selected for the RAAF #2044508
    YellowSun
    Participant

    Well credible they may be mate, but on this occasion they are not correct – not yet.

    Orders like this are not placed in secret and there has been no contract announcement. There *has* been a notification to Congress of the intent to sell, for both JASSM and SLAM-ER. That alone tells you when an order comes it will be very public indeed.

    The ROKAF press release would seem to confirm the state of play too.

    YS

    in reply to: Northolt queries: #2611169
    YellowSun
    Participant

    The mothership is watching you, Jacko.

    in reply to: SLAM-ER Selected for the RAAF #2044878
    YellowSun
    Participant

    There is no official confirmation of this SLAM-ER deal anywhere that I can find. Ja, what is your source?

    Are you sure it’s not simply a ‘notification to Congress’ announcement?

    YS

    in reply to: Northolt queries: #2611239
    YellowSun
    Participant

    I have it on good authority that they are used for mobile speed camera patrols on the A40 and M25 interchange.

    in reply to: Advanced Precision Kill Weapon System #2045712
    YellowSun
    Participant

    You won’t get a Hellfire for $25,000 – but the initial APKWS rounds were costed at $120,000!!

    in reply to: Advanced Precision Kill Weapon System #2045727
    YellowSun
    Participant

    APKWS On The Block

    APKWS has descended into farce. The programme was awarded to GDATP in 2003, with BAE Systems supplying the laser seeker. In December 2004 the whole project was binned by the Army on the grounds that it was ‘underperforming’ even though GD had had a successful flight demonstration programme to date. The Army has issued a new RFI for the entire programme, even though all the T&Cs set out in this RFI have already been met by the work done so far. The issue seems to be that the initial production costs per round are going to be huge – more expensive than a Hellfire. GDATP contends that this is only to be expected until serious production is initiated. The Army is not happy and is now considering whether to issue a complete new RFP. GDATP is seriously unimpressed.

    in reply to: Rafale ad: fair comment or darned cheek? #2635641
    YellowSun
    Participant

    Jacko

    Don’t you have WORK to do????????

    YS

    in reply to: Dornier LA-2000 a German stealth plane ?! #2640780
    YellowSun
    Participant

    The Zukünftige Luftgestützte Waffensysteme (future airborne weapons system).

    in reply to: REAL weapons on Su-30MKI #2640793
    YellowSun
    Participant

    The IAF does’nt have any Israeli PGMs. Never did.

    Oh yes it does. At Aero India 2003 the IAF displayed a uniquely Indian configuration of UK-pattern 1,000-lb GP bomb body fitted with a Griffin guidance kit.

    At the very least…

    YS

    in reply to: Eurofighter Programme Update #2636222
    YellowSun
    Participant

    JWC

    Part of the problem here is that there are two sets of negotiations to the thrashed out. Firstly there are the discussions within the Eurofighter group itself, involving the EPCs, the four air forces, NETMA, NEFMA etc.

    Secondly, and much more profoundly, there is the relationship between the UK MoD and the Treasury. I am fairly sure that on the Eurofighter side of things all the ducks are in a row and people know where they want to go. Where *everything* falls down is in the process of getting the money from the Treasury. I don’t know how much you know about the Treasury’s view of big ticket military projects – particularly those tainted by BAE Systems – but it’s not an entirely positive one.

    That’s where the problem is. Eurofighter has more or less got its act together but it doesn’t matter a damn until the Treasury can be convinced to open its cheque book. All the MoD can do is hold out the begging bowl and wait.

    Last week Rauen said that the time for any ‘interim’ agreement (some kind of letter of guarantee to provide bridging funds) has now gone – time is running out.

    The ‘deadline’ expressed by the German MoD the other day was a huge triumph of optimism over reality. I hope I will be proved very, very wrong on this one, but I still say no signature before the end of the year.

    YS

    in reply to: Eurofighter Programme Update #2636480
    YellowSun
    Participant

    JWC

    The situation is critical already – and there isn’t a snowball’s chance in hell of a signature by the 15th.

    YS

    in reply to: China's second LACM #2056881
    YellowSun
    Participant

    Right on

    YS

    in reply to: China's second LACM #2057162
    YellowSun
    Participant

    People, People!

    Re: these ‘HN-3’ images

    Of course they are CG, that is obvious from word one. The question is, do they represent something real or not. Dismissing them as “just CG” rather misses the point – everything starts out as just CG…

    Two good points have been made – firstly, a FSW design ain’t no thang, we already have AGM-129 (and others). And, if this is an illustration of a concept that maybe represents work in progress – then if it doesn’t work just put proper wings on it and carry on…

    Secondly – who said MUPSOW?! If concerns are valid and something derived from MUPSOW is at large in Pakistan as some believe, then there’s your link, perhaps?

    YS

    in reply to: Su-35 Flanker won FAB new FX contest #2668383
    YellowSun
    Participant

    A couple of things

    The Su-35 has NOT come top of the Air Force evaluation – nothing like. The FAB recognises that the Su-35, as offered, does not exist. They know it is a paper airplane. Talk to anyone within the Air Force and they will tell you that they’d *love* to have one, sure they would, but it would bankrupt the FAB with the time, effort, money, blood, sweat and tears that it would take to turn it into a recognisable, operational machine. The Su-35 is going nowhere.

    Also, all the talk about Russian help for the space programme, Russian meat contracts etc. etc. – all of that emerged AFTER the tenders had been submitted. If it’s not in the RFP submission, it cannot be considered as part of the bid.

    The Mirage 2000 hasn’t won either. If it had, Embraer would already have been proclaimed the winner and given the contract. It is clear that the Mirage 2000 bid has stalled badly – failed in fact – but, in the run up to the election, it’s now impossible to announce that.

    That leaves the Gripen – it has cons for Brazil, for sure, but it has WAY more pros. Not least of which is that Brazil knows it can trust its Swedish partners. It can’t trust the French (on previous experience) and it can’t even understand the Russians. Gripen will give the FAB the best deal in terms of technology, capability and affordability – with a clear growth path for the future.

    It is the Gripen that is sitting at the top of the FAB’s list.

    However, that doesn’t mean a whole lot. The competition is sliding dangerously to the right and even Embraer now acknowledges that cancellation, deferment or the option of an interim fighter is very much back on the cards.

    So keep an eye on what is happening with ACS. Embraer is now BIG pals with Lockheed Martin. The ACS deal brings Embraer into a whole new league and opens doors that it could never have imagined. Even though the FAB has a long-standing mistrust of the USA and is desperate to keep away from it as an equipment supplier, on a government-to-government level wheels are turning.

    What’s wrong with accepting a few second-hand F-16s in return?

    You have been warned.

    YS

    in reply to: MOP #2059379
    YellowSun
    Participant

    The Avro Lancaster was the only plane capable of carrying and dropping the Tall Boy and Grand Slam bombs.

    Apart from the B-36 of course.

    YS

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 105 total)