To answer the question…
It’s left RAFM Stafford to go to the Prop Shop (ARC) at Duxford to be tarted up before going on show at the Science Museum.
Anne
It’s the remains of the replica spit which was up a pole at the retail park built on the old Heathfield Airfield in Ayr during the early 90’s. It didn’t have much of a charmed life. Within months of being erected someone stole the prop from it. The canopy disappeared soon after and it then managed to fly about 200 yards during a gale some time around 1996.
Anne
W :p nk as in the W :rolleyes: nk W.3.
Anne
Tee-Hee…includes my all time favourite aircraft manufacturer. W ๐ฎ nk. I do believe it’s pronounced Vank.
Anne ๐
[QUOTE=whalebone]”It’s the wing I tells ya” :rolleyes:
anneorac has got it, the shorter gun was a later devlopment
Not sure how this helps old chap. The quote talks about the NACA 22 series wing which found it’s way onto the Tempest (originally called the Typhoon II).
The photos of R8831 show a standard Typhoon Mk.Ib with it’s cannons removed.
Anne
Hi all
As someone who used to play with these types of weapons for a living a Hispano would not benefit from shortning at all and would I imagine not function correctly without a lot of modification – I would opt for their not being there.
Regards
John P
At the risk of going off topic slightly. If you were playing with Hispano’s from Meteors, Vampires or other aircraft of that era you were playing with the short ones. Short being a relative term where Hispanos are concerned but the Mk.V series were 12″ shorter than the Mks.I & II.
Anne (the pedantic)
Looks very much like they donโt have their cannons fitted. Iโve seen many photos of Typhoons with short fairings and their Hispano barrels sticking out the end very much like how they appear on the Hurricane Mk. IIc. Iโm not sure if the longer two part (I think) fairings were a latter add on or if some units just did away with them for ease of maintenance. The aircraft pictured appear to have the short fairings but without their cannons.
Anne
Thanks TT. I just like being a prophet of doom :dev2:
Anne :diablo:
“Thanks to Johnathan – he gives sensible answer – however we have checked our museum with a dosimeter (available ex-mod for about 15 quid cold war stocks) and the glass DOES protect you against radiation – ie put your glazed instruments in the panel then put it behind further glass such as a display cabinet, this reduces the radiation which may reach disgruntled (and freshly second-headed) punter.
I was told that the dose on this basis would be relatively harmless background radiation and yes if you stood there for about 5-15 years then harm may result.”
True but what about the radon gas given off as a daughter product of radium decay and, as it can be inhaled, could do allot more harm than direct emissions.
Anne
With the half-life of radium RA-226 being 1600 years, if your instruments were radioactive, they still will be.
Anne
I’ve got a photocopy of a photocopy of a badly printed photograph of R1629 if that helps? I’ve also got a close up of the rotating yagi and two internal shots all of the same rather ropey quality. PM me and I’ll send you a copy…of a copy of a copy.
Anne.
I’ve never made it but for those who want to, the old AMT/Ertl A-20G kit (which is not that common in the UK) has just been released by Italeri.
http://www.hannants.co.uk/search/?FULL=IT2637
Anne.
Who…Me…look up the Putnam book Gloster Aircraft since 1917 by Derek N James…Never!
Anne
Why can’t you mention ‘Aeroplane’ magazine?
Ooh you’ve done it now! ๐
Sure enough J8047 started life as a bog standard Gamecock I with the CFS but was then sent to Farnborough for spinning trials where the tinkering started and it got to the point that it was so modified that became known unofficially as a Gamecock III.
In 1934 it was bought by J W Tomkins for ยฃ25 becoming G-ADIN.
Anne
Thanks for the extra info.
It will be fantastic to see one back in one piece let alone having the bonus of one back in the air. I would be very interested to find out what eventually happens to the non-airworthy original components.
Thanks again.
Anne