dark light

anneorac

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 594 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • anneorac
    Participant

    There are a couple of poor quality photos on Flight Global Archive which show SSVAF Audaxes. Have a look at this page and the page before.

    https://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1939/1939%20-%200540.html

    According to Putnam’s Hawker Aircraft since 1920, the Osprey moved over to stainless steel construction late in 1932. It is however a little hazy on details. Where’s a copy of a post 1932 AP1431 when you need one?

    Anne

    in reply to: Hawker Hind Instrument Panel #770908
    anneorac
    Participant

    The box is a Jettison Switch which appears to be missing its flap plate and indicator lamp. I think the other item which is half hidden by the throttle is possibly the valve for the main fuel tank.

    in reply to: Air Ministry terminology of the early 1940s #774501
    anneorac
    Participant

    OTC = Officer Training Corps. The Army equivalent to the University Air Squadrons.

    in reply to: Prop ID needed #774837
    anneorac
    Participant

    Not V690/1 but if you look carefully you’’ll notice it’s actually Y690/1 which gives you a Genet Major Powered Avro Avian.

    As I created the table linked above (and I could get a bit miffed if I wanted to as it’s credited to someone else) I can tell you that the information comes from Air Ministry Orders and more specifically props to be withdrawn from use.

    Anne

    in reply to: Hawker Hind Instrument Panel #787228
    anneorac
    Participant

    I don’t appear to have recorded the title as I was in a bit of a rush when I photographed these a good number of years ago but I think they are from the unit equipment tables which used to form the Appendix to the Volume III (Spares Schedule) of an Air Publication.

    5c items

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]262244[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]262245[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]262246[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]262247[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]262248[/ATTACH]

    in reply to: Hawker Hind Instrument Panel #787326
    anneorac
    Participant

    Sorry for the poor quality.

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]262227[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]262228[/ATTACH]

    in reply to: The 'new' RAFM Hendon , where have the aircraft gone #769501
    anneorac
    Participant

    No, it’s in store at Stafford.

    in reply to: De Havilland Aircraft Drawing Office Handbook #779927
    anneorac
    Participant

    Wow!

    That is a gold mine of useful information you have on your site. So nice of you to allow free access to it.

    Thank you.

    Anne

    anneorac
    Participant

    I’m sure that I’ll be unpopular for saying this but isn’t a bit late for a petition? The demolition work for the redevelopment has pretty much happened, I presume the building work is about to begin and the chapel should be reopening in later in the year.

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]261057[/ATTACH]

    I can understand that some people may not like the redevelopment but I’m bet there were people who looked at the plans for of the 1950s or 1990s structures and didn’t like what they saw.

    I’m now donning my battle bowler in preparation of the inevitable incoming.

    Anne

    in reply to: Salvaged prop – ID please #790933
    anneorac
    Participant

    Chaps, you are quite correct.

    The missing cover and one barnacle incrusted feature led me to see something that isn’t actually there.

    So as you were saying, most likely a DeHavilland Hydromatic prop attached to a Hercules reduction gear.

    Slightly shame faced Anne.

    in reply to: Salvaged prop – ID please #790949
    anneorac
    Participant

    Ignore this post, I was talking c**p!

    Anne

    in reply to: Salvaged prop – ID please #790956
    anneorac
    Participant

    Ignore this post, I was talking c**p!

    Anne

    in reply to: Propellor Identity please #809646
    anneorac
    Participant

    The basic DH.5220 drawing number was used for pretty much every single engine DH design using a Gipsy III or Major of the 1930s. I don’t have a listing for the MX/20 but the MX/19 and MX/21 were used on the Tiger Moth and Queen Bee.

    Anne

    in reply to: RAF Celebrate The Anniversary Of Pacman #812117
    anneorac
    Participant

    Maybe she’s grumpy because you ignored the information in her first reply.

    The item in question is not something that the RAF Museum came up with so why ask them?

    in reply to: RAF Celebrate The Anniversary Of Pacman #813525
    anneorac
    Participant

    Oh I can’t help myself…Spectrum is Green!

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]259908[/ATTACH]

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 594 total)