dark light

rkumar

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 273 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Indian Air Force Thread 20 #2128445
    rkumar
    Participant

    http://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-needs-about-200-250-rafales-to-maintain-edge-outgoing-iaf-chief-arup-raha-4448992/

    Actual quote from Air Chief Marshall posted by Aditya_V on BRF, which make more sense … of course everyone make it 250 Rafael, LCA, Typhoons, F-18/16, F-31, J-17 or F-22

    Raha said a void has been created in the past because of obsolescence and many of the squadrons will be past their use-by date.

    “We have already used them for four decades plus. It is time to retire them and get new aircraft,” he said adding this void has to be filled up quickly and 36 Rafale aircraft “will not do as we require much more”.

    ” Over the next 10 years, we must have 200-250 aircraft. It has to be balanced out. In the heavy weight spectrum, we have enough. But in the medium weight category, we need to have more. Yes, about 200 will be very good,” he said.

    in reply to: Chinese air power thread 18 #2133303
    rkumar
    Participant

    Intresting … it might confirm the rumors that J10 and J11 are cheap illegal copies of old Russian tech and no match to any decent fighter with westen or latest Russian tech.

    Our compliments and respect to J-20 for excellent show.

    in reply to: Chinese air power thread 18 #2137998
    rkumar
    Participant

    Why the hell, China have to release always pixels instead of photos?? Better delay the pictures and/or don’t release at all if you don’t have the gutsto publish good quality/decent photos.

    And other people must be having lots of spare time to stare at these pixels and kill their time to prove subject experts 🙁

    in reply to: RR accused in Indian Hawk engine deal #2159977
    rkumar
    Participant

    Ahh … people forgot BAE provided used spare parts and were fined for it. I agree, it is all India’s fault 😉

    in reply to: Indian Air Force Thread 20 #2196374
    rkumar
    Participant

    Mirage 2000 is one of bench mark fighter for India. Regarding others fighters because those are offered to complement LCA. So I don’t see a big issue with this. Even F-16 is about to close production line, that’s why its production line is offered to India. Lets not say much about Gripen.

    Having RFI for another single engine fighter is not equal to LCA is not good. Which some people here trying to make.

    Everyone is free to make stories …. so keep going 😉

    in reply to: Indian Air Force Thread 20 #2197173
    rkumar
    Participant

    They are not comparing early versions of Gripen or F-16 with LCA-mk1. Although it is clear but if people want to twist the facts, no amount of clarification will help.

    What we will be facing in next 10-20 years, tejas can comfortably beat those. So we dont need the light fighter to be Rafale and F-35. It fits the bill, easy to operate, economical to operate and fills the requirements of India.

    in reply to: Indian Air Force Thread 20 #2204281
    rkumar
    Participant

    I might love to have 1-2 RR cars but that does not mean I will buy 10s. If we wanted to buy much more why we would cancel the tender for 126 and go for 36? Lets have few in our hands then can make educated decision plus there will be other new options in next 3-5 years.

    in reply to: Indian Air Force Thread 20 #2204459
    rkumar
    Participant

    LCA MK2 is for Navy, as of now there is no plan for IAF version.

    IAF is happy with LCA MK1A with few changes which are already listed quite a few times.

    Dont know anything about Gripen, F-16 or F-18 in IAF service.

    rkumar
    Participant

    We are like that only… Mig-21 were kept ready as backup along with some helicopters. Even when we have more capable fighters, nothing beats these machines. Who will have thought this ???

    in reply to: Indian Air Force Thread 20 #2175509
    rkumar
    Participant

    Rafale, Hawks and Tejas Mk3 can be strike out … It might be mk1, mk1a ank mk2 are upgrade but totally new variant mk3 does not make sense. After mk2, the all efforts should move to AMCA. Currently it is on mk1a, mk2 and AMCA, I think already too much diversion. It is OK for now but not 3-5 years down in the line.

    in reply to: Indian Air Force Thread 20 #2187935
    rkumar
    Participant

    ^^
    Why not name it PAK FA and done with super Su-30. At least we will keep the existing fighter planes in service and get at least 50% new 5th gen air frames.

    Update oldest few Su-30 with local technology created for LCA (oxygen on board, hot refuelling, pressurised refuelling, carbon materials) and technologies which we are working for LCA/AMCA (Uttam AESA radar, Digital panels and digital mission computers etc etc). Whatever works, fix it on any plane which comes for mid life/major upgrade. Existing Su-30Mki can defeat/hold on any other 4th gen fighter.

    in reply to: Indian Air Force Thread 20 #2189258
    rkumar
    Participant

    ^^^

    J-11/Su-27 It is difficult to accept those as technology wise modern, having newer Mig-21 air frames will not make them modern.
    H6 and Q5 are going out … only 15-20 latest H6K are newer but it is disputable how modern those are? Q5 might already in reserves and may be good to use as dummies.
    JH-7A .. I wouldn’t call them modern but they are newer air frames so availability might be better.

    Plus I will write off most of the 3rd gen from modern, additionally most of those will be on their last legs.

    in reply to: Indian Air Force Thread 20 #2190823
    rkumar
    Participant

    Just a after thought …we are also working in parallel on AMCA. Number and time line wise, we will not be able meet J-20. But then that is never intended by India, if India has issues with pakistan. China has its own issues with tiwan, japan, vietnam, Indiq, Russia and USA. So they can not concentrate their whole strength at one place, if other nations play the game spolier for China, they will be in deep sh*t and running pole to pole. So at the end it is not a zero sum game between India vs China or China vs USA.

    in reply to: Indian Air Force Thread 20 #2190865
    rkumar
    Participant

    It is not that China can produce 200 J-20 overnight. At the end it is new beast and will takes its own time. I would love to see those inducted in hurry, and struggle to field.

    Regarding LCA, it may be Mig-21++ but it is/will field technologies which no other Indian fighters have. E.g. in flight and hot fuelling, flying in different environment with good loads, easy of flying, Asea. Last but not least, good feedback loop to fix any gap between man and machine. We have seen it multiple times in the past (kargil as well old wars), machine short comings can be filled with pilot training, adaptiability and skills.

    I wounder what Russia and western countries can offer to face common adversaries to build defensive as well as offensive means? But that is another topic in itself.

    in reply to: Indian Air Force Thread 20 #2191068
    rkumar
    Participant

    I think everyone is missing the point … why India should buy a 4+ gen fighter when our adversaries (e.g. China and passing to its extended states) will start having 5 gen in next 5-10 years. It is worth to hold on for some more time, PAKFA and F-35 will see the operational service within next 5 years. Depending upon the political and performance situation, it will make sense to buy 1-3 sq off the shelf with rest manufactured in India.

    LCA is a clear winner during next 10 years, no matter how HAL, IAF and MoD supports (or dis-owns) it. Rafale is becoming a loser in India with each passing day. On top, Rafale delivery and induction timeline is far fetched. Lets not talk about extended orders :rolleyes:

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 273 total)