dark light

11Bravo

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 23 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: When the fuel-oil runs out #2343611
    11Bravo
    Participant

    soaked in oil

    The U.S. is briming with oil (Alaska, the gulf, off both coasts, oil shale in midwest). But, we won’t drill for it, maddening.

    We must get this oil and alleviate the pressure building in Asia and Europe.
    Leave middle eastern and east european oil for the Asian, European, and hopefully future middle eastern economies. North America and South America have vast supplies for western hemisphere

    in reply to: Someone Besides Hot Dogs's F-35 Cyber News Thread #5 #2350288
    11Bravo
    Participant

    How many of the partner nations have pilots flying in the f-35 program?

    in reply to: 5th generation tactics/thinking #2356138
    11Bravo
    Participant

    Not to change the subject, just wanted to say that the future applications of Australia’s F-35 fleet, in terms of employing the future stealth platform in a manner consistent with it’s design intentions appears to be in very good hands.

    I had the great pleasure of visiting the 90th FS “Dicemen” @ Tyndall, AFB in Florida recently while they were attending WSEP live firing exercises.

    SQN LDR Mattew Harper from the RAAF is part of this unit. He is an outstanding gentleman, and a tribute to Australia. I had the opportunity to mingle with the Dicemen on several social occasions, what struck me about SQN LDR Harper, was that in a room full of America’s best, he was clearly held in very high regard.

    Fighter pilots don’t really talk about the talents of other fighter pilots very much, mostly their own abilities. In this capable group, SQN LDR Harper was repeatedly lauded as a great stick and employer of stealth tactics. Which led me to think what an asset for when the F-35 comes down.

    I know we have an RAF pilot flying 22’s, any other future F-35 countries have pilots embedded in Raptor units, makes a lot of sense to learn stealth strategies?

    in reply to: F-35 news thread II #2405470
    11Bravo
    Participant

    Betting on 65m… With pricing numbers all over the map, and 65m being one of the lowest, I’d gamble on the plane coming in for more than that.

    Two seats would make it a real strike aircraft. It would be curious if that development would happen with this airframe. It won’t happen with the -B.

    TVC? Not needed IF the AIM-9X Block II works as advertised.

    Ahh, it’s one of those rare golden ages of fighters. Euro-canards everywhere, very mature and capable teen series with great price-tags, Russian stealth, perhaps Asian stealth on the drawing boards. The US has had a buyer for the Raptor offer 190 mil, and we said no! With-out all this think of what LM would charge for f-35! Good times.

    Two seats would make it an incredible strike platform, UAV & ISR multipler. Maybe a decade down the road but inevitable, surely.

    TVC, an air shows dream. Can you imagine the Blues or the Thunderbirds with TVC f-35’s circa 2020, what a show, an incredibly expensive show, but what a show. Still wanna see one of those Euro-canards in person. Beer talkin’, goin to bed.

    in reply to: F-35 news thread II #2406089
    11Bravo
    Participant

    Stealth sets it apart from the competition – arguably justifying it’s rather steep price tag. Aside from that, a similarly kitted SH (or plug in your favorite 4G airframe) can do much the same work – provided that an adversary’s air defense have been sufficiently attrited. A rather large provision.

    If it works as marketed (stealth and all systems), 65 mil US makes it a good bird. Range is good, stealthy internal load-out is decent. Non-stealthy external/internal load-out is very good. Good motor, the promise of the avionics is compelling. 65 mil, what are the odds?

    The future: 2 seats, TVC ( I know, be’in greedy, i’m really hopin for a super-man. 35 one day,).

    in reply to: F-35 news thread II #2406100
    11Bravo
    Participant

    TVC would be one of the least valuable upgrades. It’s the other features that will make it a great fighter for its users(as is).

    Agreed, but it’s WVR capabilities are what seem to draw the most ire when compared to 4 gen platforms, Eurocanards, or God forbid Raptor or PAK FA. Even if DAS & HOBS work as advertised, doesn’t help in a gunfight. Guess a smart 35 guy just stays away from that fight. He ain’t out runnin’ PAF FA, though.

    in reply to: F-35 news thread II #2406147
    11Bravo
    Participant

    What would render the f-35 a great fighter for its buyers? Price, inhanced wvr capabilities ( TVC), etc..?

    11Bravo
    Participant

    Perhaps when you look at Madrat’s figures it is easy to forget that Europe is not one nation. Each nation will only deploy a part of its fighters (if any at all, certain European countries have the annoying habit of not fighting when others are) which means of those thousands of fighters only a few can be deployed at once and is entirely dependent on each individual nation.

    You want a strong “EU” force deployed, you have to convince the British and the French to fight (usually the most willing deploy and the 2 largest military forces and the only to be able to carry out the full spectrum of operations), then the small scrappy nations (Denmark and Estonia for example), then you have to drag others in who either can’t or won’t deploy much (Italy, Germany being 2 of the more obvious won’t’s, although the Germans have been trying harder recently). Even after all that you still have a country or 2 in the EU that would rather annoy all the big nations that also happen to be their neighbours rather than lose their neutrality (yes Ireland i’m looking at you).

    In short, you asked the Eu to fight tomorrow and you’d not get the response you need unless someone is actually rolling tanks into the Rhineland. Integration won’t change that because they have to go out of the way to satisfy the neutral countries and those who don’t want to fight.

    Fascinating dynamics. Again, the propensity of Europeans to down-play their military arsenals is sublime. Taken as a whole, the European continent cannot be contested, unless from within, much like the progressives in the states.

    11Bravo
    Participant

    Great info madrat, thank you!

    Lot’sa fighters and strike capability

    There is serious expeditionary capability listed as well. #’s of tankers, EW support, etc.

    In my hometown, here in the US, we have a German manufacturing plant and a French plant as well. As I speak with my European friends about contingencies (Iranian nuclear ambitions, China arming to the teeth) and hostilities (war on terror), you would think that Europe was disarmed. I keep pointing out the #’s of Typhoons, Rafales, Tornadoes, etc. And this is just the EU Air Forces. In heavy fighters alone, Madrat had about 1500 fighters. They all seem to perform very well on deployed excercises around the globe, which speaks of training.

    Nuclear capabilities, a few emerging carriers, seems pretty damn strong.

    in reply to: Silent Eurocanards — is it feasible? #2420447
    11Bravo
    Participant

    there isn’t really a market for a stealth Typhoon or Rafale. Rafale is not selling in great numbers, Gripen NG has hardly had an auspicious birth. I think the emphasis is going to be on increased range with CFT, possibly TVC for better operational efficiency and AESA.

    I am quite sceptical about the Stealth Rafale, because its at such an early stage. I see that as something which might help france sustain the Rafale fleet over the next 20 years because they aren’t buying the F35.

    It appears Boeing is creating a bolt on stealth market. As stated earlier, trying to keep their lines relevant for a few more decades. Gotta be given Lockheed, Dassault, EADS, fits. Eagle and SH should be winding down, instead still going strong into next decade. Gotta be a record for fighthers.

    Any visuals on stealthy, CFTed, or stretched Eurocanards.

    in reply to: Silent Eurocanards — is it feasible? #2420807
    11Bravo
    Participant

    For the Eurocanards a formidable ew-suit will do. From the Europeans non is looking to win an arial war against a super power. For some few mission left outside that some stealth UCAVs will do it much cheaper. 😎

    You never know. If China made a play for western Pacific, attacking U.S., Japan, and S. Korea, wouldn’t Europe have to help.

    in reply to: RENO AIR RACES #419558
    11Bravo
    Participant

    I visited Reno in 1998. Flew from San Francisco and boy did that 737 climb! First time I’ve had contrails off the wing tips and a feeling of being squished in my seat.

    Show was great with some very colourful Furies.

    I also did the CAF Airshow and remember being surprised by a Uk based Nimrod being on show.

    I was @ Reno 1998, my first race. The Furies are still colorful, and the 737 is still the sportscar of commercial aviation. My dad flew with the hero’s of Col. Bud Day’s Commando Sabre Misty’s of Vietnam, they’re being honored this year at the races. Gonna be a great event. How about a Tiffie over here?

    in reply to: RENO AIR RACES #419564
    11Bravo
    Participant

    Only if you let us have some of ‘our’ V-12s back!

    Did Spitfire (greatest fighter name ever) and Hurricanes all have the RR v-12?

    in reply to: European stealth #2373377
    11Bravo
    Participant

    I think of stealth like swept wings, once discovered, it will forever be a part of future platforms. In reading this thread that is not the general consensous. And that, folks, is the value of these discussions.

    I see the f-22 as an incredible morphing of the f-15, with all it’s new capabilities, and the sleek look. Of course it is a brand new platform. I was hoping/speculating on a similiar transformational process for phoon, rafale, grippen. Again, I know, brand new planes, billions required. But, we are also talking about the next fifty years.

    Autonomous UCAV’s, scary proposition, but probably the future.

    in reply to: European stealth #2373836
    11Bravo
    Participant

    I’m not saying it’s a wonder weapon, or impervious to defeat. I am saying that it is a war changer that must be accounted for

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 23 total)