Can someone please translate the data of the missile?

This are SUU-7A/B cluster pods. Because there are other bombs under the wings it is loaded with CBU-1/46 and bomblets for a CAS operation not very far away (because there are no external tanks). Interesting pictures.

the germans and french have agreed to define exactly what they want the new platform to be, and not let any new “partner” get in and interfere with the requirements.. once it’s done, they’ll propose the deal “as is” to others (ok guys, here’s what we’ll do, do you want to play with us on it?), ensuring they know in which direction they go and don’t waste time in negotiations trying to please too many politicians with contradicting interests

This is the only way to prevent cost overrun, like on Eurofighter and A400M. The never ending story of politicians of different countries who want their special requirement build in is the grave digger of such projects. The new Franco/German way should be an acceptable way to make a working aircraft in an acceptable time frame.

I doubt that UK can afford such a project after Brexit. After some years the economy of UK will steadily decline say all serious forecasts.

Tornado ADV, no. MiG-31 with R-33 yes, because R-33 was an active missile.

To control drones means robot swarms. So, whats the problem? It means that the new fighter may be used maned and unmaned controlled by a maned aircraft, or many unmaned in a swarm with a swarm of drones and so on. Thats much more than a wanabee F-35.

Was you a mercenary? Where from? Who were the opponents? Is there a link describing this conflict?

Sorry, I mean Sea Sparrow was NOT really effective against missiles.

I thing, from mid 70ies the most ships had Mk91 directors. Sea Sparrows was a point defence system against aircrafts. It could not really shoots down P-35. But in the 70ies there were some sort of soft defence available like chaff and ECM. I don’t know how prone P-35 was to chaff or ECM.

BTW, the Kyndas had eight ready missiles and eight reload missiles.
Sea Sparrow was really effective against missiles. The early Sea Sparrow with Mk115 director was man steered and not able to shoot down missiles. The more modern Mk91 director may be theoretical able to do it, but I am sure it was not really effective against missiles. The flight path of P-35 was unfavorable for Sea Sparrow and better suited for Terrier and Tartar. The P-35 flew with 1.3 mach, the reaction time was very short for Sea Sparrow. P-35 flew around 100m above sea for the last miles to the ship. It was removed in 2003. There were enough replacements for P-35 around in the Soviet/Russian Navy much earlier and why it was not replaced? It seems it was still effective.