dark light

Cajun21

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 45 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Carrier Aircraft, Wing tips up in flight #940105
    Cajun21
    Participant

    The F-4E in the OP is from the 57th FIS stationed in Iceland. It was in maintenance prior to the flight and the down lock pins on the wingfold were not engaged. After takeoff and during climbout the tips folded, and then “overfolded” during the decent for it’s emergency landing. It was repaired and returned to service about 3 months later. Part of the fallout from the incident was to have the downlock pins painted red so the could be seen better against the grey when the were in the unlocked position.
    Cheers,
    Itch

    in reply to: Spitfire/Hurricane Brownings #983497
    Cajun21
    Participant

    In the US it is permitted to have the guns in the aircraft but they have to be, often refered to as, “De-Mill’d”. AKA de militarized. I saw a .50 cal in a P-51 with a modification to breech by welding a plug at the end of the breech so that the weapon would only accept a blank cartridge, shorter than a “real” round, which could be fired and ejected. There was also a nub welded inside the barrel where it joined the reciever and blocked about 25% of the barrel diameter there by not allowing a projectile to exit the barrel. Also saw similar setups on Russian warbirds in the US like a MiG 17 & 15 for their cannons.
    Cheers,
    Itch

    in reply to: P-40 Kills #1212074
    Cajun21
    Participant

    Thinking about it…

    Stats, talk of ‘aircraft kills’ (it’s the pilots, not the aircraft) and utterly pointless ‘was x better than y’ schoolyard level debates miss the point of real history completely.

    Wasn’t it Baron von Richtofen who said “it isn’t the crate but the man in the crate that makes the difference.”.
    Cheers
    Itch

    in reply to: Your loudest aircraft? #1367215
    Cajun21
    Participant

    Has to be the T-37. Often referred to as the “6000 pound dog whistle” or the “Converter” (converting JP-4 to noise). Very high pitched and very very loud on the ground.

    Cheers

    Itch

    in reply to: Glider Pilots picture. #1406658
    Cajun21
    Participant

    Skypilot62 & Sat2
    Thanks guys that clears it up.
    Cheers
    Itch

    in reply to: Glider Pilots picture. #1407930
    Cajun21
    Participant

    Skypilot
    Noticed that all are wearing wings. Are they the glider pilots or are those jump wings? Also the majority are also Sargents.

    Cheers
    Itch

    OOOOPS
    Just reread the thread title, DOH … brain freeze.
    Itch

    in reply to: Help please – Appropriate readings for memorial ceremony #1438503
    Cajun21
    Participant

    Dave,

    Would “High Flight” be appropriate? Anything from the heart also works well, along the lines of “all gave some and some gave all” type of feelings

    Cheers

    Itch

    in reply to: ANY INFO ON F-105 THUNDERCHIEF BOMB BAY? #2621668
    Cajun21
    Participant

    Juni,
    The radar was a simple ranging radar,WD-5, if memory serves, They were no IR capabilities except for what was carried in the AIM 9’s. The term fighter bomber does sound strange now but back then it was one of the few a/c designed with a gun in the true sense of fighter/bomber. Other a/c being designed during the time period were depending on missiles for the primary and only weapon. The 105 also had a probe & droug refueling system (ala Navy type) along with the refueling receptical system. When the 105 was being designed and built the Air Force hadn’t determined which system it was going to use so Republic put in both systems. It came in handy a few times when you were away fom your primary tanker and found a Navy tanker to beg some gas off of.
    I found this one small pic in my files of a 105 in T’bird markings, I’ll search for more and better ones later.
    Cheers
    Itch

    in reply to: ANY INFO ON F-105 THUNDERCHIEF BOMB BAY? #2622406
    Cajun21
    Participant

    Juni,
    To the best of my knowledge the F-105 never served in the interceptor role during the Cuban Missle Crisis, or any other time. You may be thinking of the F-104 Starfighter. The 105 was designed from it’s outset as a lowlevel, high speed, tactical nuker, interdiction fighter/bomber and as such not really suited for interception work. It’s main purpose was to dash into a foreign country, kick out the nuke and (hopefully) return to it’s base. Basically air to mud as opposed to air to air.
    The original Thud’s, the B models were natural metal for a time but it was found to be overtly prone to corrosion and were then painted silver dope to lessen the corrosion. The D models were also painted silver dope when they were manufactured under project “Look Alike”. This was supposedly to make it difficult to distinguise between the B and the later D model.
    The Thunderbirds did in fact fly the F-105B for about half a season, approx 6 months, but after cracks began appearing in the nose gear they were pulled from service and replace by their old F-100D’s for the remainder of the season and they never went back to them. It is interesting to note that the T’birds’ 105 were in fact natural metal, highly polished natural metal. I think I have a photo of one of their B’s and if I can find it I’ll scan it and post it for you.

    Cheers
    Itch

    in reply to: ANY INFO ON F-105 THUNDERCHIEF BOMB BAY? #2622596
    Cajun21
    Participant

    A small correction there, Itch. Three T-46 prototypes and a single static test airframe were built before the project got canned. One is preserved at Edwards, and one at Celebrity Row on AMARC at Davis-Monthan.

    Thanks Arthur, I stand corrected. Next time I get to DM I’ll make a note to look it up.

    Cheers
    Itch

    in reply to: ANY INFO ON F-105 THUNDERCHIEF BOMB BAY? #2622639
    Cajun21
    Participant

    Juni,
    The T-46 never went into production, in fact it never left design stage so it was only on paper. Fairchild Republic is still in existence, they are not manufacturing a/c but are still in the aerospace industry.

    Sauron,
    Yes the Thud was a bit bigger than the F-101. The 100 missions was the majic number for a pilots’ ticket home. The only “counters” toward the 100 were the missions flown into N.V.. Any mission flown to Laos or S.V. were not “counters” so a pilot could get as many as 150 missions before he rotated out of theater. On average 100 missions took about 13 months.

    Nani,
    I’m 5foot 10 inches tall, yes the Thud is a very big a/c. The picture I attached may have some distortion to it as it was digitized from a photo.

    Cheers
    Itch

    in reply to: ANY INFO ON F-105 THUNDERCHIEF BOMB BAY? #2623943
    Cajun21
    Participant

    Juni,
    Yes the Thud is a good looking a/c, especially in plan view where you can see the area rule fuselage (wasp waist) design. The roll rate was about 385 deg / sec.
    Being a product of the cold war and designed as a tactical nuclear interdiction fighter bomber the Thud was not sold to anyone else, it was totally unique to the US inventory. You are also correct in that many other a/c could out turn us, so we wouldn’t normally engage in a turning battle with someone. If we had to we would execute a high speed “yo-yo” manuever. When the other a/c started his turn in the horizontal plane we would go vertical (about 60 deg), roll on our backs and pull back to keep the other a/c in sight and fall on him from above and behind, in other words our turn would be in the vertical plane while his was in the horizontal, we could then maintain some tactical advantage. HTH

    Cheers
    Itch

    in reply to: ANY INFO ON F-105 THUNDERCHIEF BOMB BAY? #2624752
    Cajun21
    Participant

    Transall,
    Thanks, that pic is one of my “steely eyed defender of Democracy and Freedom” shots. It is good to still be with you, considering we lost about half the aircraft we had in theater. Of course that has to due to the fact we had the highest sortie rate also. I was very fortunate in my 2 tours, only lost one returning from a mission and had one fall apart on me taxing back to the revet, that cost me a few pints 😉 . Glad you enjoyed them.

    Cheers
    Itch

    in reply to: ANY INFO ON F-105 THUNDERCHIEF BOMB BAY? #2624846
    Cajun21
    Participant

    Sauron,
    Yes it is, “when I wore a younger man’s clothes”.

    Juni,
    The Thud was the biggest Cadillac in the valley for a long time. Maybe not the prettiest a/c in the air but certainly one of the most capable. We did most of the work (75% of all the bombs placed on N.V. were put there by 105’s) and the F-4’s got all the press. Below 10,000 feet AGL we were the fastest thing in the air, we were known to out run MiG 21’s and we also carried a gun which the F-4’s didn’t in the earlier models, much to the surprise of more than a few MiG drivers. 🙂

    Cheers
    Itch

    in reply to: ANY INFO ON F-105 THUNDERCHIEF BOMB BAY? #2625665
    Cajun21
    Participant

    GZYL,
    This pic may be of some help.
    Cheers
    Itch

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 45 total)