Our formula student kiddies headed off down to Brunty today. I’ve given them all the gen on the LPG etc with strict instructions to get lots of decent pics ๐
Sadly, other committments prevent me going with them this time.
Hope you have a great weekend Andy – what a triumph the LPG is.
Roy.
Shame you cant make it
Thanks for the words of encouragment, we certainly try to please ๐
Be glad to see you all, we need the support.
Cheers ๐
doh, soz andy, must ave been writing at the same time.!!
MJR
Milt Ive been sat here for over an hour, going over it all in my mind trying to get it all down in a logical way,
Have you ever read the book on the reheat system, wow thats riveting bed time reading……. not !
See you Friday ๐
Quote XL391
Yeah, here’s one for you Andy!!
In pictures of 728 (and a few other frightnings) the flame from the lower jetpipe in reheat (is this number2 engine?) always seems to be longer and brighter. Is this because of the way the engines are staggered in the airframe? Or is it just me talking total and complete sh**e??
Quote Bager 1968
Well, since the lower engine was beneath the wing, and the upper engine was behind the wing (therefore closer to the back end)… good question?
Logic would say that the upper engine’s exhaust should be brighter, but the real question is not where the engine itself is located, but rather where the reheat module is located… as this is sometimes mounted on the engine body and sometimes a lengthy exhaust tube is between the two!
Perhaps the lower reheat module is closer to the outer end than is the upper one?
Right chaps I did say any questions didnt I, and you would pick on the most complicated part of any Lightning, so after alot of sitting here wondering how I can explain it in basic terms here goes;
Firstly the Lightning reheat system is and always was a law unto its self.
No two reheats were ever the same even when they were in service being fettled day and night by teams of grubby ‘sooties’.
In a perfect world they should be both the same, the distance from the engines should make no difference as the fuel is ignited at the same point in both pipes, No1 fuel just has further to go down the pipe before it is ignited.
No 1 engine being the lower one below the wing and No2 the upper one which starts just forward of the leading edge an ends below the tail fin.
When reheat is engaged by the pilot (or idiots like me) alot of mechanical/electrical things click into montion (I havent got the time or will power to type it all out here, sorry)
Basicly when the system is all go and the nozzles go to fully open, a ‘hot shot’ of burning fuel is injected into the pipe (which is sometimes visable when you stand well down wind) this ignites the reheat fuel at the burner ring which is in the same place on both pipes, which like I said earlier should give two even flames out the back, but seldon does, as both engines and reheat systems are separate and are both very difficult to harmonize,
many hours were spent on reheat pans trying to do this, I can assure you.
Those of us that do and have done this kind of thing will tesify that you can spend hours getting it all to work perfectly, and the next time out its as though the gremlins have been in and done their worst.
So basily to answer your question yes they should be equal, and some times god willing they are, many a time burners on operational Lightnings were all over the place, some even going out. (when this happens the system automatically closes the nozzle fully to give extra thrust, which is some cases meant the difference between getting off the ground or not)
Now to add another dimension to your question regarding 728, we do have an on going reheat snag that manifests its self as a minimum No2 reheat flame, this is something that just turned up one day about 2 years ago and since that time we have been slowly working though the systems looking at potensial items that could cause this problem, you have to remember this is a Lightning and nothing is easy to get to, also when ever we need to try it to see if we have fixed any item we need the best part of ยฃ500 worth of fuel to try the reheat and see if our fix has worked, we also upset the neighbours. :rolleyes:
What we do know is as the nozzle goes to fully open and the burner lites, it then goes to fully closed which cancels out the buner, so what you see is a smaller flame for a few seconds as the aircraft powers away form you.
What it will be is a soleiond valve sticking, but that means No2 pipe out and a good few days work, which at present we dont have time to do (Q shed getting in the way ๐ )
So if you are all still awake, (even Im nodding off) thats about the top and bottom of my answer to your question.
How about some easy ones, I can do them. ๐
Andy B
Will see you Saturday Andy!
TT
Look forward to it, are you any good at removing cones from the runway, oh and there’s the little job of sweeping it as well ๐
Cheers
Here she is at Waddo today, looking very nice, well done chaps

Please guys for the love of all that’s good and holy, don’t clash with Legends next year!
Sorry Damien, its out of our control, we have to fit in around what the Waltons have booked in for each weekend durning the year and the 8/9th July was the only one that has been alocated to us for the past few years, we also get the airfield for free because we have it on the same day as Formular Student race day who pay for the site but dont need the runway, if we had to pay we would have to charge alot more at the gate, bearing in mind we arent doing this to ‘just’ break even, we have another 50K to raise for the Q shed.
Sorry, we have disscused this issue many times within our group and have so far not come up with a better plan
Regards
Andy B (LPG)
Most in the outside world regard it as useless information ๐
Anymore questions ?
I will try to answer
This part of the airframe was vunerable to fatigue/stress fractures and to make inspection easy they would not paint them.
The idea was that it would be quick and easy for ground crew to spot anything wrong and then the airframe inspection engineer could do the neccessary without having to strip and re-paint that part.
I have only been told and read about this so back up from an experienced airframe tech. please!!!.
Regards,
John.
.
Spot on John, the panel is the main stess panel of the airframe, taking wing loads and No1 engine thrust loads though the engine bearers.
The panels were always under close inspection, if you look closely on both of ours there are many different sized rivets as over the years they were drilled out and fitted with bigger rivets as the stress cracks moved out from each hole. A very important panel on any Lightning.
Cheers
Andy B (LPG)
Off the back of this thread I thought I might post a picture of XX894 taken two weeks ago just so that you can all see how great sheโs looking at the moment.
A gratuitous plug I know, but we are very proud of the work that we have been doing over the last couple of years!Plazz
Looking good mate, see you on the 8th
Nice pics, hope you witnessed us running 904
Cheers
Andy B (LPG)
320psi
“Ive always had the dubious honour of being the smallest across the chest to get by the radar bullet for FOD checks, starter leak checks etc as well ”same here try a hunter intake or jet pipe even less room
Yes I know all about the Hunter intake we look after the ex swiss one at Brunty and its always me that ends up head first down there with my crust againt the starter dome and my boots above the level of my head, its a strange feeling. ๐ฎ
Yep still here and still trying to get a window so that I can come and visit all the Brunters posse!
Although if the rumours at work come true I might have more time on my hands than I know what to do with! ๐ (for the second time this year!)
Funny stories ,don’t feel that you can’t share them! ๐
Cheers, Alan
Your welcome any time, we plan to give 904 a little stir this sat if your free ?
Sorry to hear of your possible job loss I know what it like if that helps any. Keep smiling ๐
I wouldnt want to share most of the stories over the Web, I think a book is the best way ๐ ๐
Cheers
320psi
First one Baz and me lol
Second one Baz,Me and Johnso it was you and in the intake then
Yes I shared it with you if you remember, very intermate darling ๐ ๐
Holy s@!t, thats expensive, who’s your supplier, thats daylight robbery. Ill pm you.
OK I will name and shame, Victoria Hydralic’s of Leicester, I have only used them once which is how I know the price per gallon, most of the time we come arcoss supplies ๐