Andy,
Dont worry about boring us with your insights, that will never happen!
I know ,from my small involvement with classic aircraft, how hard it can be to find the time to do things, let alone find time to write about what you do as well!
If you ever get round to writing a book I am sure it would be well received, it isn’t easy to write about a subject and make it easy for people to understand at the same time without waffling, a bit like I am now!Keep it up!
Cheers, Alan.
Cheers Alan, nice to know your still out there.
Ive got so many stories, mostly funny ones ๐
Andy, do you seriously pay 65 quid a gallon for OM15?! Or did you mean 6.50 a gallon?
MJR
Yes we have done in the past when Max or Phil hasnt helped us out, if you go to a comerical stockest that the going price, promise.
Why are you offering any on the cheap ๐
markp451a were you one of the chaps that came over to Brunt in 1991 with Barry when we had 728’s no.2 out for the first time ?
I did the starter, as i was the only one that could fit past the bullet.. one thing i would say it was no fun fail safe/leak check on both starters… lol
These few shots might bring back memories:
One Avon 302 on its way down

The chap in blue is the one and only late Baz Livesly, what he didnt know about Lightnings……..

And yours truly being born again from the top starter hatch once the new engine was back in
Ive always had the dubious honour of being the smallest across the chest to get by the radar bullet for FOD checks, starter leak checks etc as well ๐
Cheers
Andy
How about fixing a pair of seats to the tailplanes? ๐ฎ ๐ฎ .
Seriously, this will be my third year to Brunty and the car is now packed to capacity……….keep up the good work lads.
Regards
John.
Jokingly we once thought about putting the over wing tanks back on 904 with holes cut in the top and bolting a seat and harness in each, put a bike helmet on and ‘Bobs your uncle’
A three seater Lightning ๐ ๐
Cant imagine what 0-150kts in ten seconds would be like in the open ๐ฎ
Dont worry it was only pub talk after a few pints.
Glad you can make it John, come and introduce yourself
Andy B
Andy B
I always find your e-mails fascinating.
Have you approached any of the oil companies to see if they were prepare to sponsor you at all or even give (eek!) you a supply of POL to keep these mighty jets running? After all their (oil companies) success & profitability has in part been down to the huges quantities of POL purchased by HM Gov (although they probably don’t see it that way!!)
Keep up the fascinating responses!
Kind regards
NickB
Nick, thanks for the comments,
I sometimes shy away from typing endless explanations but this subject is very close to my heart so here goes.
You never know my time with these two old ladies might end up as a book in about 20 years !
I will try to make any responses entertaining ๐
As for sponsership forget it, I have been down so many dead end roads on this subject over the years with both the aircraft and the QRA hangar, we entertain so many prospective sponsers which take for ever to decide on what they can offer us which drags on and on wasting time, so far we have had no takers for anything we have done, which in some way I can understand, they get hardly any return for their money because we have no way of advertising their names, Brunty is very out of the way, has very few visitors, has very tight security (which is great in one aspect) and has no general apeal.
So we have taken the line over the years that we the 12 shareholders stand the costs for our hobby (which it is) and try to hold open days so the general public can come and share the sight and sound of two alive and kicking Lightnings.
Its now becoming more and more costly (insurance wise) to have the public on site, but we must keep it up to raise the outstanding amount to finish the hangar.
Hope that answers your questions
Why not come along on the 8th July
Cheers
๐ ๐
Andy, probably a daft question but are the seats live for a taxi-run?
Steve.
Hi Steve, yes its a daft question, the seats on both were made safe within hours of us taking delivery of them, everything else is very much alive though, mind you some of us humans are slowing ๐ ๐
There’s no need to make them live for fast taxying, you need to be doing well over 90kts (this is the lowest speed that the canopy will be ripped off at) and at 10,000ft (not saying you cant eject below this height though)to get the best results from the seat fitted to the Lightning
Our two will only get to 120-150kts (depending on wind direction) at the top of Bruntingthorpes hill after a nine/ten second reheated run, and thats eaten up half the runway, 1mile, its then pop the chute and gentle on the brakes, they tend to get very over heated with our fast demos. (over heated brakes means blown tyres) ๐ฎ
In the event of any problems like a trye blowing/brakes/steering failing the pilot would have to sit with it untill it came to a stop at the end or in the crops at the side of the runway, we always follow with fire tender and crash van with ladder, its then release the emergency canopy handle and extact the pilot, theres a risk in all of what we do, which is why insuance keeps climbing and we practice these events as best we can.
Fire is my biggest concern. But the fire tender is big.
Cheers for the interest
Andy B
Somebody once told me, that the tyres had a very short life, and so when practicing touch and goes they didn’t let the wheels contact the runway…
I don’t know if thats true, but if it is it seems pretty incredible.
Steve
Yes tyre wear was and is big problem, they never did touch and goes, one landing could well total a set of tyres with a cross wind like ‘megalith’ says above.
Very thin and 21bar/320psi does them no favours when 14 tons lands at 200mph
We might get two/three runs out of our tyres.
markp451a were you one of the chaps that came over to Brunt in 1993 with Barry when we had 728’s no.2 out for the first time ?
I have some piccies somewhere if it is you
Just for the record that one’s been out three times since then ๐
Cheers
100 hrs maintenance/servicing to 1 hour flight – that sounds incredible!
Just out of interest what sorts of fixes were required after 1 hours flight (aside from of course refueling, tyres etc)?
At the time that was what the costs worked out at for the total flight package and infrusture around the aircraft per aircraft the on the flight line to the tax payer, I joke not.
One hours flight might not bring any snags, all the usual BF’s were as you said but we are talking lightning here.
Keep fingers crossed that my lottery ticket comes up tomorrow as I’ll charter the new Airbus and take you all out there, however you will have to provide your own sleeping bags and tents.
Incidentally, what does it cost to do a high speed run in a Frightening at Brunters or Cranfield, the take off sequence and fly by at The Last Last Lightning Show at Binbrook must have increased the National Dept by 100%.
Here’s a little break down of our costs on an open day:
3rd party Insruance = ยฃ4,560 for two days so divide that by two
Fuel for a single run = ยฃ200ish
Avpin at present price’s = ยฃ155 per engine start working on last quote for a 45gallon drum
Cant give a price for a possible wrecked set of tyres after a single run (which does happen) we have a good stock of tyres we aquired a few years ago.
would assume the price per tyre from Dunlop would be well over ยฃ1000 each (but we have never had to price any up.)
Also brake chutes do sometimes get totalled, last time we had a qutoe from Irvin, the drouge alone was ยฃ500 each
Hydralic oil OM15 = ยฃ65 per gallon, in a run we might lose half that on the concrete once the aircraft shuts down
Engine oil = ยฃsimular to Hyd oil but the use is measured by a tiny amount
All our time servicing them (which is about 2hrs to do a BF and 1hr to do an AF ) is free of course.
So if you forgot about insurance,chutes and tryes, just to do a single fast run up Bruntingthorpes runway is about:
ยฃ540ish
Shame we cant take passengers as we might recoup some of these costs as the 458 crew do at Cranfield, not sure how Russel goes about insuring his passengers, we stuggle to insure the crowd !
Hope this gives you an idea, they are only rounded up figures mind you
Cheers
Andy B (LPG)
They were running out of fatigue life and were incredibly costly to maintain. The threat from the Soviet block was also deminishing so the purpose of having a short endurance point defender had evaporated.
That about sums it up, the cost in maintance alone was 100 hrs servicing to 1 hrs flight back in 1988.
With the ref to DGH “When I was at Thunder City the engineers working on 693 told me they didn’t have enough parts to get all 4 up at the same time and so 773 would be robbed when needed” the plan was to fly 773 until life exed ( which ist long) and then remove the fin mod and fit it to 693….. so at the mo 693 is flying without the fin mod and has to be NDT a lot at the mo…..
As for ships in the UK 903 is all most life exed
JS has some life ( how much i do not know)
724 has 1 or 2 FI left
458 would be poss the bestthe 2 big problems would be spares as most are in SA and the CAA
Just jump in here, JS, 728 has 1 FI left but has serious heat destortion to the port side under wing/engine bearer stress panel (its a long story).
Cheers
Good response Andrew – I wholeheartedly agree with you.
I think we should also remember the costs of running these complex and very thirsty a/c. While we would all love to see a ‘wish list’ of fantastic fast jets gracing our skies I think we should remember that somebody has to fork out huge amounts of money just to keep them airworthy – let alone fly them.
Those of us who were lucky enough to have seen the RAF’s & Fleet Air Arm’s heavy metal thunder across our skies in the 60’s, 70’s & 80’s did so because the maintenance, fuel and ground/aircrews were paid for by HM Gov. not a private individual or consortium.
Point made – sorry to go on but it gets a bit tiresome constantly hearing some forum members go on and on about getting certain pointy shaped aircraft in the air like it was just the case of putting air in tyres, fuel in the tank and chocks away!
Hear hear, Im one of those ‘lucky’ people who fork out to keep two Lightnings taxiable and its not cheap even doing that, the costs go on and on and on, insurance and fuel being the biggest snags at present.
Cheers
You ain’t got a hope of getting XS903 flying again, its starting to corode, it aint got engines and its not had its systems run up in about 20 years, its a nice enough static exhibit but it wont ever be anything more.
I must add here as well, 458 will be in a worse corrsion state than our two, (we have corrosion in the wheel wells and thats after 18 years of lavish TLC and waxoil, 458 had no attention till Tony Hulls got his hands on it in the mid 90’s.
724 was flown from Warton to Shawbury when its FI was up, it then made a final flight to Binbrook, and as we all know there is nothing left of the pans, perimter track or runways there now, so getting 724 out would be a big task.
I feel that to fly a Lightning in the UK is a bigger headache than the Vulcan’s return to flight.
Just buy a ticket to Cape Town, where the skys are blue ๐
Totally off the cuff here but which airframes currently in the UK would you want to chose for potensial flyers ?
There arent many candidates…. or the servicable spare to go with them.
Both of our two are right up to the limit on FI on the airframes, both well over 4000hrs.
I hate to say it, but its not going to happen, and thats from me who’s been looking after Lightings in taxible condition for the last 18 years, they are really very very complex, frightingly so.
As a long time owner and engineer within the LPG I wouldnt personally want to see either of our two flying, the pressure of ‘what if’ as it flew out of sight would kill me.
Just be happy with what you see flying here in the UK and pop over to S Africa, if you need a fix of Frightning
Cheers ๐
Nice one mate, well done ๐