Tachikawa Ki36 Or Ki55 Ida, same aeroplane but the 55 was used as a trainer. I just noticed the bomb racks under the fuselage so this is probably a Ki 36.
John
Possibly a 182, 192 or 195 which was the last subtype.
John
Of all the almost identical types the 185 is the closest I can get.
John
Well, we can try this and see how far it gets.
John

Keep going chaps.
John
The Puss Moth similarity should be coincidence but in my opinion some other types by that designer also look like copies too. I can’t give the country as that would be too easy.
John
All similar concept aeroplanes, but no.
John
I don’t think it’s a warplane as such and I’m sure there are no cannon (but scratches)
My first and lingering thought is a Ju 34 with underwing codes and crosses all smudged by movement and a poor photo. Short nose ,Radial unequal taper wing and narrow tailplane. Note also how the rear fuselage top appears higher than the nose area. Just visible behind the t/e are cabin windows? Crucially ,Where did it come from?
John
Or the Tatra or Dolomites. Or the Big Rock Candy mountains
John
There are no Miles auxilliary flaps so not a Messenger.
I have superimposed a rough Ju34 sketch.
John

The similarity to the Puss Moth was why I chose this one Though I know of no techincal connection I think it’s a case of “I like the look of that, I’m going to design my next aeroplanes to look like that”.
John
There is one aeroplane which would fill most critera. Single engine, twin fins and striped wing. It’s the Swiss C3603 in Neutrality markings but I don’t think thats the one in the photo as the nose is too short. It will be interesting to know what the main content of the photo is for this to be in the background.
John
Here’s a clue.
John

The most common Mks of Peggy (Mk XV111) for Wellingtons.1a,b,and c, V111 and CXV also Sunderland 11 and 111 all favour a ratio of 5.1. The Mk X pictured was also 5.1.
John
I don’t know if you can work out anything from these.
John

