Sorry no.
John
Now here’s one to think about.
John

When these a/c were designed they weren’t just night bombers, hence the all round armament. The front guns were often used for searchlight suppression as well, but otherwise not much used. To “just remove them” would bring C of G and other engineering problems so it was probably easier to keep them.
John
It’s a Herrick HV.2
John
Blogger (or similar sort of sound), The Thalman was to be my next post.
John
Groundhugger. I must confess I use my own library for posts and never think to look on the net.
John
Looks very like a Hungarian Kaplar[corporal] circa 1947
Absolutely, now I thought that it would hang around a lot longer. Where did you find the info?
John
Here’s one for the little grey cells.
John

No – mine was the removeable spinner cone only.
This would bring the measurements nearer the Monforton dims. I estimate the backplate to be approx 1.5″/2″.
John
Stearman LT.1
John
RA101
J
Well it is the WM.13 chaps, but I’ll have to deduct points as it’s from Janes 1936 🙂
John
Yup – same as the one I checked today.
Thanks again for your trouble gentlemen. So to be totally retentive, I take it that the Spinner cone is 24″ long with a Dia of 24″. Inclusive of backplate measured on two examples. It’s interesting that Paul Monforton’s book, based on three different surviving Spitfires, gives 25.823 inches length on page 2.30. Page 2.39 gives 25.45 for a rather blunter-tipped example. Diameter at base is 25 inches. This latter info relayed via Graham Boak.
John
Do you know this one?
John

No, I’m certain that the backplate diameter didn’t change, but I’m begining to think the length may have.
John
It’s the Francis Lombardi designed Saiman LB.2.
John