Pix
Hey, Anna, great photography again!
Liked the ones with the P-51 and Spitfire!
Alex
Great photos again, Anna!
Alex
Tripod, Yes with remote shutter release. Used AV or Aperture Priority to control shutter speed and ISO set at 100 apart from the Met helicopter and Hawk pilots, which was on Auto as there was movement and needed a quick shutter speed.
The Sky in the first three have been ‘enhanced’ a bit in Elements but the rest are as is.
Brian
Thanks for the info, Brian
The second shot of the Century Hawk is especially nice, along with the shot of the Tucano below it. Good work.
Night Shoot
Nice shots, Brian.
Did you use a tripod and long exposure or did you ratchet up the ISO?
Is the red sky in the first shot natural?
Great pix!
Hey, EsK
Those are some very, very nice pictures.
Keep them coming – how wonderful to be able to shoot without some Wuffo walking right in front of your camera!
Photos
Nice, very nice!
Great Shots!
Nice photography, Anna.
That’s one colorful Hunter!
You do get around.
Alex
Black-n-White
Hey, Anna,
How come Victoria’s shot of Laurel & Hardy isn’t in color??
One More Spitfire For Anna
Thanks, Zwitter.
Hey, Anna, here’s one more Spitfire for you. Unfortunately, it’s not homegrown. It’s a storebought one, a plastic fake! It looks pretty good from a distance. So does the replica Hurricane outside. At least it gives folks a comparison in size and shape with the other more modern aircraft parked outside.
To make up for the fake, here are a couple of shots of a War2 bomber that you guys (and gals) probably don’t see too often in the flesh. This one’s the real thing, not a fake.
Alex
Re: Edit/Crop – More OSH ’09
AVI,
Stunning pictures you have post here… i realy love them… only i have a little remark.
im only saying that you can edit your pictures a bit because a couple of your airshots (the C-5 galaxy for instance) would be better if it was a bit symetrical if you get my point)… It can give a bit more impact if you can center the subject instead of having it on the edge of your photo…
If you look at my photo’s of the Vulcan at Volkel you can see what i mean (all these foto’s are edited to get the most out of this beautifull aircraft)…
http://forum.keypublishing.com/showthread.php?t=91914&highlight=VulcanKeep on posting these great looking pictures and i realy like the spitfire once (sorry anna, you got competition on that one hahaha ;))…
Grtz,
TG1984
OK, TGun – I see what you mean now. Thanks!
Check the F4U and the Tweet. Duh … Now I see how you guys (and gals) get up close!!!
LoLevel
Wow! Keep ’em comin’ !!
Great Work
Great photography, Anna!
I can see why the Spitfire is your favorite – what beautiful lines!
The one of the P-40 on final is also a very nice picture.
I’m a bit envious in that exotics such as the Spitfire, Hurricane, and Vampire in actual flight appear to be so commonplace in the UK.
It’s a bit different over here where the Spitfire in flight is a rarity. In all the airshows I’ve attended, mostly in the US, I’ve yet to see a Hurricane other than on static display.
On the other hand, we get to see amazing aircraft such as the F-22 and V-22 perform.
They put on utterly amazing performances.
Terrific work!
Great Shots!
Hey, TG
Great shots! My favorite is the one with the F-16. You got it at just the right time!
Alex
Anna’s Spitfire
Competition is good! ;):D
Wow! That is one great Spitfire photo, Anna! Stunning!!Thanks. Mk XIX, isn’t it?
Anna, what kind of camera and lens did you use to take this picture? And what do you normally use? Camera/lens combo?
What suggestions do you have regarding a good lens for in-flight shots?
There’s no problem getting close up with the heavy iron like the C-17, C-5 and A380, (they are huge!) but the little guys like the P-51s and Spitfires, not to mention the SF-260, are often times too far away to completely fill the viewfinder. What size lens do you use for this?
TG’84 – Thanks for the suggestion about cropping the picture. Yes, I can see it myself in the C-5 shot. One of the initial problems I experienced was trying to lead the airplane with the camera. And, yes, you’re right – it’s more effective centering the airplane in the viewfinder. Gotta admit that I was a bit too amateurish in attempting to “compose” a shot in the viewfinder when it would have been more effective (and easier) to center the subject. Thanks for the suggestions. Much appreciated.
Another problem I’ve experienced on more than a few occasions is the camera losing focus, hitting on empty space in the sky, causing a lost shot. By the time I’d brought the camera down to focus on a distance on the ground and back up again, the plane had flown on by!! Missed the shot!
How do you prevent this from happening?
This is Debbie Gary flying one of the former Irish Air Corps SF-260s imported by Mike Patlin for her airshow routine at Oshkosh on Friday, 31 Jul 09.
How’d she know I was taking her picture? She’s looking right at the camera! Or was it my good looks? :)-
More Spitfire For Anna
More Spitfire for Anna. Of course, nothing to compare to some of your terrific Spitfire photos!
Same airplane in Oshkosh with the Canadian WW2 display. Canadian Warplane Heritage brought down their Lancaster, a Hurricane, an F4U, the Spitfire, a Lysander and a P-40. The beautiful yellow nosed P-51 stayed behind.