dark light

Tom Kay

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 61 through 75 (of 123 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Questions about Merlin Crankcase Studs #927918
    Tom Kay
    Participant

    Updates? Wish granted, but settle in for the long haul.

    Maybe I should have a “Paint my Merlin” contest. I’m leaning toward a nice royal purple at the moment, subject to change.

    Tom.

    in reply to: Questions about Merlin Crankcase Studs #849712
    Tom Kay
    Participant

    Hi Whitley Project and Pete. Thanks for your efforts. I agree that taking all the studs out seems a tad cheap, but this is the second person that has stated that they would do so. I can’t say I was shocked.

    So I’ll start by cleaning the threaded holes, trying to read the ID to get an idea of the size, then carefully try to screw in some samples of various BSF bolts. I also considered squirting in some “Repli-Set” under pressure, letting it cure, then unscrewing what would be a rubber bolt. Then I could measure it. Maybe that will prove to be not needed.

    I’m a bit surprised that fine threads are used as studs, since I always thought that coarse threads are used to anchor into aluminum. However, I’ll proceed on based on your answer and assume fine threads.

    Thanks, and if you trip on any more info, feel free to post it. I’ll also probably post a few pics of the project as I go, if people want to see Merlin internal views. I have learned a lot from a couple internal views of the crankcase and front nose case that I never knew, specifically the vent holes (or oil return holes) that surround the bottom of the upper gear shaft (see pics).

    Cheers, Tom.

    Tom Kay
    Participant

    Think these lot have any scrap parts?

    http://www.51-factory.com/inventory.htm

    Yes, when ever I visit that site, my job drops and I start to drool. I have called them, and one of their guys is asking the boss if they have a hopeless crankcase for sale.

    As for the epoxy paste, I may consider that, but I like the idea of repairing things properly. The supercharger and wheelcase I have are otherwise functional, and if the cost is not brutal, I’d consider proper welding.

    Cheers, Tom.

    in reply to: The world's first supersonic airliner? #1134388
    Tom Kay
    Participant

    I for one, found this to be quite interesting. Thanks Graham, and keep ’em coming.

    Tom.

    in reply to: Corsair Pictures #1151922
    Tom Kay
    Participant

    And for those of you who like lots of pretty colours, plus a prop that appears imbalanced, even though it probably isn’t, voila.

    Actually, I like this shot.

    Tom.

    in reply to: SR-71, KG-200 & Red Eagles books. #1100368
    Tom Kay
    Participant

    How about Brian Lecomber’s novels, Talk Down, Turn Killer and Dead Weight?

    Dead Weight was my fave.

    Tom.

    in reply to: Wanted: BF-109 Airframe Pics and Drawings #1101805
    Tom Kay
    Participant

    Guys;

    Thanks a lot for the info and the pic. You gotta hand it to the Germans, they could design!

    I hate to overstay my welcome, but if you happen to have a thousand more pics, feel free to beam them over. I love looking at other people’s airframes.

    Cheers, Tom.

    in reply to: Wanted: BF-109 Airframe Pics and Drawings #1102838
    Tom Kay
    Participant

    Mondariz and Qld Spitty;

    Thanks for the leads. The site at http://www.leichtbau-gmbh.de reminds me that my German isn’t as sharp as it could be, but I like pictures. Even more in some publications!

    There’s a huge pile of stuff to wander through in the Wikipedia site, especially the “109 Lair.” Good link !

    Pretty soon I’ll have to start my round of silly questions, oh wait, now’s perfect. Here goes:

    1. I see that the fuselage skin from cockpit to tail, is actually made up of sections, from one fuse frame to the next. Is this done to make compound curves more easily? I mean, unlike the P-51, is a simple flat-wrap on the rear fuselage of the BF-109 impossible, based on tapered shape and curvature?

    I would have thought this method would lose a fair percentage of strength, compared to one long seamless sheet of aluminum fuselage skin, but it obviously worked.

    Tom.

    in reply to: Wanted: BF-109 Airframe Pics and Drawings #1105400
    Tom Kay
    Participant

    Hi Guys;

    Thanks for all the replies. Of course, Google was my first approach, but I have found things don’t always show up on Google. So that’s why I was hoping someone might have bookmarked a site or two. One that I did find, is the rebuild of Red 7, but the pictures are so small, they’re cute but not useful.

    Chumpy, thanks for the pic. I was surprised to see how in the middle the spar appears to be. Yes, by the way, the Spitfire is out. A Titan T-51 looks about right for a Spring Chicken like me, but the price tag’s high. And I’m still waiting to see how the FWF package survives, after one in-flight crankshaft breakage. Aside from a few cosmetic compromises, I like the T-51, and have been studying it for fun.

    Then, as I was innocently surfing, I just happened upon some BF-109 Youtube clips, and God, she looks like a mean, purpose-built beast. So that’s why I want to get a bit cosier with how the airframe looks. I also love that whistle from the variable charger.

    Shorty01, thanks for the prints link. I can’t recall the last time I felt rich. I guess that begs the question; “what the hell makes you think you can afford anything more than a balsa model?” Answer, call me a dreamer. At least that part’s realistic !

    BrewerJerry, now that looks like an outstanding place to start snooping. I will register right away and get reading.

    Thanks again all.

    Cheers, Tom, (wanna-be tail dragger).

    in reply to: Spitfire engine drawings #1205256
    Tom Kay
    Participant

    Hi Justin;

    This is quite basic, but perhaps this will get you started. I don’t have dimensioned drawings of Merlin parts, rather just a few dimensioned, general arrangement pics.

    If this comes out too small, write to me at: tom DOT kay AT nrc DOT gc DOT ca and I’ll send you a few by email.

    Tom.

    in reply to: Spit tropical filter.. #1259059
    Tom Kay
    Participant

    Ross;

    I haven’t checked your website in a while, but I hope you’re updating it with new pictures. It’s a terrific site. I really liked the fuse-frame hammer forming shots.

    And, most of us who will never get our hands on real Spitfire metal, have to live vicariously through you. This is an important role, Ross.

    No pressure.

    Cheers, Tom.

    in reply to: Spitfire Wing Attach Question (replica) #1279601
    Tom Kay
    Participant

    Hi AVI;

    Yes this is an interesting thread. Very similar to what I’d like to do. So thanks for the heads up on this thread.

    I am stuck at the PSRU and propeller stage. I firmly believe that everything else is doable, but I have to solve these two major tasks, or it’s not worth starting the project. No point in building a plane if I can’t power it.

    However, I have approached this like I’ve approached everything else. Gather/read/ask/probe, and finally decide. I’m not at the decide stage yet.

    It may be possible to build both a PSRU and a propeller. At 400 hp, the stakes are pretty high, though, so this is not something I’ll rush into. In the homebuilt forum I have been asking a ton of questions about PSRU’s and what drives them, (literally). There really are so few firms making them, if you discount the ones that have disappeared in the last few years (Geschwender, Cam).

    I’ll try to keep an eye on Planeguy and see how he does.

    Thanks again, Tom.

    in reply to: Pinging MkI. A few Questions about your Prop and PSRU. #1297356
    Tom Kay
    Participant

    Hi MkI and Beurling;

    MkI; Thanks for getting back to me about your PSRU and propeller. I was curious what level of confidence you have in these two units, overall. I guess what I revert back to is fear of the unknown, and vibration plus its effect on any mechanical unit are unknowns for me.

    I also simply do not know who to trust when it comes to buying a PSRU. Company claims are simply too much like sales pitches, and often backed up with too little data to believe. Do Hy-vo chains really attenuate or dampen vibration? Not according to some manufacturers. But absolutely according to others that use these chains.

    So I have been searching to find incidents of PSRU failures. I am trying to narrow my focus to spur geared units, not chains, helical gears and cogged belts, although I have found failure examples for all of those. I want to have some understanding of failure modes, and see if there is any common parts that seems to fail. So far, I have found that output shafts seem to snap and this has surprised me a bit, since I would have assumed that this would be a pretty beefy part. This would seem to suggest that it’s breaking due to tortional fatigue (don’t quote me on that) which in turn might indicate propeller vibration and power pulse issues from the engine. Perhaps these two vibrations are ganging together and making the forces bigger than predicted. You know, the propeller does its worst just as the engine does the same. I can kind of picture it, but this is pure speculation on my part. All I know is that PSRU’s are failing. Are they failing more often than props, engines???

    Beurling; I’m surprised if there are belted units that handle 1000 HP. Thanks for letting me know. If you have any links on PSRU’s please share them, especially 400 HP + vendors.

    I have tried to find the Camdrive vendor. Are they no longer operating?

    Thanks guys, Tom.

    in reply to: Hilarious Mistakes On Screen #1246574
    Tom Kay
    Participant

    There are an infinite number of gaffs of this type. Am I the only one who thinks the B-52 in Dr. Strangelove has a B-17G shadow while on it’s bombing run deep inside Russia?

    If it’s true, you can bet Kubrick meant it to be.

    Tom.

    in reply to: Spitfire Replica. Any Lower Cost Power Unit Alternatives? #1250204
    Tom Kay
    Participant

    MK 1. I like your soapbox. Your soapbox is helpful.

    Hi;

    OK, good points and bad points. The 100K estimate for this project is a bit of a spleen crusher. I hate reality, but at least my dear sweet wife won’t likely read through this forum. You are no doubt closer to the grand estimate than I would be, me trying to put a positive spin on cost control. 100K, huh? In the immortal words of E.T., Ouch.

    But then there is some good news. Your homemade PSRU intrigues me, but as you’ve alluded to, this is a pretty significant piece of hardware. And using a Chevy LS2 means more power, more reason to get it right, more likely self destruction if I get it wrong. My biggest concern in making a PSRU is the vibration issue. I believe I can manage most other challenges, from casting or machining from billet, choosing flight-worthy spur gears, bearing choices, oil circulation, and possibly even accessory services drives that exit the PSRU at various locations. But the vibrations in their many forms, well, that’s like black magic to me.

    I guess what you’re relying on, in your particular case, is the appearance of smooth operation in the first 62 hours of service. Question; are all damaging vibrations detectable through the seat of your pants, or are there types of vibrations that are damaging yet un-feelable? I went through the EPI website, and have gotten some pretty awesome replies from Jack Kane, who based on his replies, I’d have to label “Mr. PSRU.” I believe there are enough separate forms of vibration to scare away the average higher-math-challenged rookie like myself. But again, if the vibration issues were solvable, I would be willing to at least do some preliminary designs and hardware sourcing. Metal working on a mill has its challenges, but that’s the stuff I enjoy.

    Now there’s the prop. Again, a homebuilt affair for you. Please, tell me more. Three blade, 6 plies of birch, kevlar coated. Do you mean a layer of kevlar is epoxied to the surface of each blade? And the bosses, I see these as cylinders that the prop ends get stuffed into and epoxied. I think the props made in BC by GSC Systems have a bolt through the wood to act as a fail-safe to keep the blade in the hub if the glue fails. Do you have that arrangement? Just curious. I assume the sandwich block hub is much like GSC’s but again, correct me if needed. I’m not sure if you ground adjust all the blades at the same time (they all move as one unit) or if you adjust each blade spearately. If so, you have to use some sort of angle gauge, no?

    Do you happen to have any pics of the prop close up, or the PSRU?

    Like any over-zealous homebuilder, I have given thought to making the prop. I cannot believe it’s impossible, even at the higher power levels. That just sort of ups the ante. With cnc machinery, at least the likelihood of getting 4 or 5 blades all the same shape is pretty good.

    Thanks again and hop onto your soapbox any time.

    Tom.

Viewing 15 posts - 61 through 75 (of 123 total)