dark light

David_Kavangh

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 121 through 135 (of 935 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Restoration of B-26 "Flak Bait" at NASM — news story #923573
    David_Kavangh
    Participant

    Interesting article. Shows the importance of conserving aircraft so as not to lose the history. So many people, not on here, bang on about restoring all aircraft to fly, not understanding what would be lost, even if it was possible.

    in reply to: 70 years ago today #923706
    David_Kavangh
    Participant

    I think it is actually tomorrow.

    in reply to: RIP Les Munro #923944
    David_Kavangh
    Participant
    in reply to: Kermit Weeks Lancaster #848734
    David_Kavangh
    Participant

    I give up……

    It still ended up in USA.

    in reply to: Kermit Weeks Lancaster #848775
    David_Kavangh
    Participant

    Ok, wrong choice of words, I meant a legal dispute that couldn’t be resolved, mostly because of the intransigence of BAe’s high paid lawyers – who usually benefit from these sort of things. Not a reflection on the owner of the Lancaster, who his estate. He wasn’t to blame for the hangar collapse.

    Kermit says he was surprised when he ended up with the Lancaster. His bid being accepted.

    The point I was trying to make was that the story of the Lancaster in UK is hardly something for people in UK to be proud about. It’s a terrible sad, depressing story. When initially there were such high hopes.
    At the end of the day, it was Kermit who saved it, not anyone in UK.

    in reply to: Kermit Weeks Lancaster #848816
    David_Kavangh
    Participant

    I find it a bit difficult to criticise Kermit and what he has and hasn’t done with Lancaster KB976, considering it arrived in UK, an airworthy aircraft, and while being in UK a hangar roof fell on it due to negligence and and a stupid unresolved legal dispute between the owner and BAe led to bits being spread all over the country, some left outside being further damaged. Only Kermit’s money saved the project. No one in UK was able to.

    in reply to: Kermit Weeks Lancaster #849623
    David_Kavangh
    Participant

    There are some fairly recent photos of KB976 in the shipping containers in Florida on this page, towards the bottom of the page.

    http://www.timefadesaway.co.uk/strathallan/kb976/kb_976_8.html

    in reply to: Hurricane LF363 incident #849778
    David_Kavangh
    Participant

    I have noticed that for a spotters group, a lot of their aircraft recognition is a bit suspect.

    in reply to: Gatwick 1960s – something for the older spotters #849849
    David_Kavangh
    Participant

    I believe so.

    in reply to: Gatwick 1960s – something for the older spotters #851226
    David_Kavangh
    Participant

    Ah! Hadn’t realised that, I’m watching it in UK right now.

    in reply to: Ian Allan has Died #868207
    David_Kavangh
    Participant
    in reply to: Avro Lancaster KM-B 44 Squadron #869471
    David_Kavangh
    Participant

    Sideslip, you are quite correct. The Flight moved from Coltishall to Coningsby on 1st March 1976. The mid upper gun turret was fitted at Coningsby on 18 March 1976, so the photo was taken between 18 March 1976 and 1979 when the AJ-G codes were added.

    in reply to: Avro Lancaster KM-B 44 Squadron #870986
    David_Kavangh
    Participant

    “A Lancaster at Peace” by Sqn. Ldr. R.E. Leach is a good start.

    in reply to: Avro Lancaster KM-B 44 Squadron #871425
    David_Kavangh
    Participant

    PA474 was NEVER converted to B.VII, it has always been a B.1. Where do these stories come from?

    I’m amazed that the history of PA474 is now being confused with the markings of other aircraft it has carried. I’d posted earlier a list of the aircraft she has represented since 1973, include KC-A of 617 Squadron, she has only had these markings since 2012. She’s not the aircraft built in 1943! PA474 was built in May 1945, too late for operations in Europe.
    She then went to East Africa with 82 Squadron on survey work, and then to Cranfield as a test aircraft, including carrying a laminar flow wing on its back. Intended for the RAF museum, she was taken on by 44 Squadron and return to flight by them, and carried their Squadron markings KM-B. It then went to BBMF in 1973 still carrying 44 Squadron’s codes.

    The turret was obtained from Argentina in 1975. It was from a training school and never fitted to an Argentine aircraft. The AAF stopped flying their last Lancaster in around 1966. This turret was shipped to UK by RN and fitted to PA474 in Jan 1976. That is why I said that the picture must have been taken between 1976 and 1979 when PA474 changed codes from KM-B to AJ-G.

    And yes, the larger fins were there from the beginning, like a number of late build Lancasters.

    in reply to: Avro Lancaster KM-B 44 Squadron #871794
    David_Kavangh
    Participant

    ……and it was built in 1945.
    The turret was added at the beginning of 1976, so the photo was taken between then and 1979 when it became AJ-G

Viewing 15 posts - 121 through 135 (of 935 total)