Having had a look at the photo’s again and look through the Vol6- Repair and Reconditioning AP- it is apparent that should some of the snow on the rear fuselage and adjacent area not be removed then further damage will acrue. Much of that area is secondary and tertiary structure while in the rear fuselage itself the primary structure consists of the longerons and the cross beams with primary frames at each end. Their purpose is to support the ECM cans when fitted and absorb the stress of the brake chute deploying.
By the looks of it NEAM has one thing in abundance thus why not remove the sleepers from under the nose and replace it with compacted snow which ends just short of the nose wheels. As I suspect the aircraft was delivered sans ECM and NBS its current weight is around the 90K mark instead of 102K -ish. Using compacted snow as the support will allow two things to happen
1] clearing the back end will allow the aircraft to lift off its rear end thus reducing the damage.
2] where possible use extended brooms to work around the wings to destress them.
3] with as much snow removed as possible from the upper surfaces and the aircraft resting on the snow pile it should be possible with care to start melting the snow pile slowly so that the Vulcan then rests as it should do.
4] once on the ground use the sleepers- lashed in bundles- to secure the aircraft via the nose u/c picketing point- believe me the aircraft and the leg were designed to take the stress.
5] keep a beady eye on it to stop it tilting againThe alternative it to wait for the thaw which will introduce large amount of water into the airframe and will require a crane and sling to put it back down safely on the ground.
A crazy idea maybe but if memory serves it has been done before many years ago.
Cheers
Madjock
Would say the idea of pushing a big pile of snow under her nose wheel and then a few sheets of 8×4 plywood sheets ontop of the snow pile would do the trick.
remove some of the snow from the rear and then get a fire truck to hose the rest off, or a good powerful steam cleaner could be rented for a small fee.
With those pallets now in place they have made the job a lot harder and risky to get the nose back down.
jacks and other heavey equipment are now going to have to be used.
if that snow melts and she starts to go back down, she could crash through some of those pallets.
They are railway sleepers, not pallets.
Should be fine with those sleepers then,
Appreciate the need for a quick soloution at the time,
The RAF have 2 sittng at Syston.
these should cost them nothing, just some transport i guess.
Picture from the flying display,
found a few bits out of my loft today, 1st with a few pics was an old news paper that i picked up many years ago,
Sunday pictorial dated Sept/07/1952
full details on the front and page 3, from the Farnborough DH110 crash.
just was wanting to see if the news paper in very good nick was worth anything and worth putting on EBAY.
few picture below.


Also i have a old RAF classrom pilots or electricians exercise book with lots of hand written diagrams of nav lights wireing drawings and stuff of Aircraft circuits etc.
most of the works have been marked and ticked etc, and dates are logged as 1942. will post a few pics of this later.
many thanks for any help.
cheers Rich.
Tranny van or pikey 4×4 would run very happily on the stuff.
Been very brazen in the past, cutting there way in to Airfields and trashing Police Helicopters up and down the country.
The use of politically incorrect phraseology in this forum is to be deplored.
The correct term is Transit, for heaven’s sake. 😡
Will remember that next time you refer the Lancaster as Lanc or the Spitfire as a Spit etc.
petty minds.
Yes you are both correct in the names.
the picture was taken a few days before the show,
Ann Todd and David Lean.
Have found a few other old bits also. namely an old 1941 The Aeroplane Spotter.dated Sept 18/1941.also in very good condition.
some 1st day covers,from the early 70s.
By all accounts no body was stopped, reports of many people in the field.
also looking at images posted on some of the forums, it looks like it was open as normal.
Intresting, I live on the doorstep of Withybrook vilage, would be intrested in anymore on this story.
Hardly. TCO is much more. The Norwegian TCO figure put in by Admiral A. Roksund was $769 million lifetime cost for each of the 52 F-35s (50 years of service, 9,000 airframe hours makes 180 flight hours in a year).
The Norwegian TCO is ~$85,450 / flight hour
Looks like they will fall apart after 17years service, cracks found in the F35 again full story here. http://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/cracks-discovered-on-f-35b-bulkheads-391647/
I would say that the RAF have flown pretty much all of the USA’s aircraft on the pilot exchange, The late Ken wallace flew for SAC and flew B36’s, it has been
common over the years for exchange postings.
yes I think one of the 1st F117 displays was made by a RAF pilot, and ex Red arrow pilot.
Same way that the USA have flown our aircraft.
Merlin engine piston ashtray ending soon, http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/281181787448?ssPageName=STRK:MESELX:IT&_trksid=p3984.m1555.l2649
cheeky plug.
Spot the description contradiction! http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/HEAVY-METAL-WW2-ORIGINAL-AIRCRAFT-PROPELLER-CUT-DOWN-RELIC-1951-/360762994961?pt=UK_CPV_Aviation_SM&hash=item53ff267111
1951 would have been a little bit past WW2, Looks more like a cut down wind tunnel prop.