My one looks different π
A user on flugzeugforum.de found those video-links:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CFe8CsOdoG8&feature=relmfu
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M9LsK74J_W0
Now I am quite convinced it is not a model …
They sell “Tucanos” AND “Hurricanes” π
Maybe they are right and Mr. Rossiter’s search party did actually discover a Liberian bulk carrier disguised as the Ark …
I read it as “Ju88 our crew killed”, explaining the pic, and “total crew kill 22”, referring to the claims of the crew members
Well, so far for aircraft recognition … :diablo:
I wonder if the 410 might be hit as looking at the photo, the tailwheel doors are open and the wheel is partially out. (hydraulics?)
Just a guess, but centrifugal forces maybe? I believe a similar phenomenon appeared on Spitfires with retractable tail wheels when flown in tight manoeuvres.
There was a thread here about wings in a shed some time ago but it was dealing with “metal” wings (from a Siskin). If anyone is still interested:
http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/showthread.php?t=80780&highlight=shed+siskin
Do you know if she is being kept in airworthy condition in case the financial situation changes.
As far as I know, yes she is. However, the runway at La FertΓ© Alais currently is too short to fly her out someday.
Thanks to spitfireman we know the registry of the first “Texan” (which actually seems to be a Harvard?)
http://www.warbirdregistry.org/texanregistry/harvard-753473.html
I am also under the impression, that this plane may be used to be wearing “enemy” colours and not necessarily had been repainted for movie work.
http://www.airliners.net/search/photo.search?regsearch=N16730
As for the Hind makin a good SAR machine, I doubt it, lack of internal space would be a limiting factor when you consider the difference in capacity of the Hind and Sea King.
CSAR – Under fire Sea Kings really can’t shoot back.
Thanks Don! The first two links were the leads I was trying to get. π
However, Gentlemen, I found yet another nut to crack:
Is there ANY (photographic) evidence that Heyfords actually had been repainted from NIVO to Dark Green/Dark Earth camouflage, as suggested by the Machbox instructions, at all? Apart from several built model kits I haven’t found a single picture neither on the internet nor in my sparse references on paper yet. :confused:
Hi all,
sorry, for dragging this thread up again.
I am working on the Heyford model kit on and off and am stuck with the forward fuselage. Apart from some cockpit detail (like the throttle quadrant – sadly it seems the RAFM still did not manage to photograph their relic π ) especially the bomb sight worries me.
Which type was in use with the Heyford? How did it work? Are there any pictures or drawings around? The only picture of a Heyford bomb sight I know is this, but honestly I do not find it very helpful for my purposes …
However, if the East German airforce was top-of-the-range standard Russian first line equipment, why was it then really hurled in the bin?
What about the spares, the personnel, the bases?
Mainly it was a political decision, but I’m under the impression things like obtaining spares (at all!) were contributing factors. AFAIK, at that time it was REALLY difficult dealing with the Russian manufacturers regarding spares. You just did not ring the usual contact at Mikoyan for a bunch of engines at the usual price and had them delivered the usual amount of time later at your doorstep.
Also for the Bundeswehr as part of NATO it was much more logical and reliable to go the consistent way and use mainly the usual equipment from your usual suppliers.
Shame about the Mi-24 though. They would habe made good CSAR-helicopters …
About the personnel and the bases: Well, due to the lack of the potential aggressor from the east, there was no need to maintain even the size of the existing Bundeswehr. And now think of the influx of an entire second armed force. So away with it – and who cares? Merging two states turned out to be expensive enough (and still is).
There are some memories about Hilary Edrige in Tim Vigor’s book “Life’s too short to cry”… thought it might be worth mentioning.
Miles Tripp – The eighth passenger
Presumably that’s the famous `Spitfire trailing smoke captured from the nose of a German bomber` you see in a lot of old war news reels, World at War etc.
I think so. A still from this newsreel was a popular inclusion on many post-war German books about the Spitfire and/or the Battle of Britain.