dark light

gui

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 61 through 75 (of 110 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: If I have anything to say about the French, this is it: #2632324
    gui
    Participant

    old pic

    oh, and that’s “vive la France “

    in reply to: Hawkeye #2633169
    gui
    Participant

    The french navy has three E-2C Hawkeye, which will be upgraded to the last standard.

    2 are onboard the CdG carrier at the same time.

    pics :

    http://www.airliners.net/open.file/674069/L

    http://www.airliners.net/open.file/653754/L

    in reply to: dedicated CAS aircraft, obsolete by today? #2639106
    gui
    Participant

    CAS is something essential and anyway it’s hard to send expensive aircraft to do it. These planes will never be completely useless even if outperformed.

    France is actually annoyed because it will retire its Jaguars soon which will leave a gap. They are talking to use the new (I’d even say future) Tiger helicopter for close support instead of using planes.

    in reply to: airbus a-400 #2640215
    gui
    Participant

    your datas are wrong Jetlag, here are the current numbers : (note that Portugal and Italy gave up the program)

    Germany : 60
    France : 50
    Spain : 27
    United Kingdom : 25
    Turkey : 10
    Belgium : 7
    Luxembourg : 1

    edit : I’ve seen you posted both the old and the current numbers , anyway that would be better if you could check what you post, because it’s obvious that doesn’t match.

    in reply to: Operational Evaluation Comparison: C-130 V C-160 #2645656
    gui
    Participant

    The French and the West Germans wanted to replace their Nord 2501 Noratlas (produced by the SNCA du Nord french company.) I guess they prefered to build their own aircraft (which is understandable as regard to jobs, work for european companies etc.) So the French and the Germans made the Transporter Allianz (wich gives the name of the aircraft : Transall.)

    in reply to: Operational Evaluation Comparison: C-130 V C-160 #2645695
    gui
    Participant

    I read something about a Herk with only two engines, was there such a thing that actually flew and if so, would this be a better competitor for the C-160?

    there’s the G222 and its new successor, the C-27 Spartan.
    It is a smal Hercules in fact, and it has two Herk engines and even its avionics now I guess.

    in reply to: Operational Evaluation Comparison: C-130 V C-160 #2645702
    gui
    Participant

    if we compare the smoke produced by the engines, the C-130 is by far the winner ! :p

    in reply to: USAF to retire last C-141Bs #2648356
    gui
    Participant

    So, what’s the current status of the C-141 fleet?

    How many C-141 C will stay?

    in reply to: MRH-90 to Australian Army #2654996
    gui
    Participant

    “EADS, an N.V. according to Dutch company law, is quoted on the Frankfurt, Madrid and Paris stock exchanges. More than 34% of its shares are widely distributed among different shareholders. DaimlerChrysler and the French holding company SOGEADE (Lagardère, French state) each hold over 30%. The Spanish state holding company SEPI owns 5.5%.”

    in reply to: A few questions.. #2664359
    gui
    Participant

    The best aces were germans and the highest number of aces belongs to WW2 Germany.

    This doesn’t mean the allies pilots were bad, but germans were superior for sure.

    These aces were better because they saw more action, and were very very experienced. In fact allies pilots, british for examples, had to fight for a certain number of tours which means that at the end of a limitated time, this was over for them. At the contrary there was no respite for the germans which were outnumbered etc. So they fought all the length of the war.
    Plus some of them were experienced even before the war since they fought with the Condor legion in Spain, where they even invented the tactics used through the whole war on each side (finger four formation etc.)

    Also most of the aces with the highest scores were on the eastern front were they had to face many russian pilots among who there were many rookies. So these great aces who fought since the early war fought against less less experienced pilots and could score easily. (Although it is true that afterwards russian trained pilots were better and better.)
    The more they fought the more tired they were but also more and more experienced. And experience is all, what was more important wasn’t to know how to do incredible air combat maneuvers or to know how to aim like a god (even if it helps) but to guess how the enemy will act, how to be careful in order not to be shot down etc.

    Also at the end of the war there were a few german pilots left. It was far easier for a german to score a kill against dozens of adversaries, it was less easy for an allies to score as it was more difficult for him to find adversaries.

    And that’s why many german aces scored 100+ victories, 200+ victories etc. and there is even the incredible case of Hartmann, the russians even wanted to judge him for destruction of the russian economy.

    All pilots agreed that german pilots were the best and feared them. They were the best because they fought more and had more adversaries.

    Anyway we musn’t forget that most of WW2 german pilots were killed, they fought until the end, and at the end, apart from these aces, the rest were rookies.

    in reply to: Ghostbusters logo on greek Mirage 2000 #2666511
    gui
    Participant

    It wears a fez and a veil, and the logo says “Mehmecikbusters” for obvious self explanatory reasons since this is the original original Lawn Dart killer

    The photo Copyright belongs to Nick Karatzides and it was taken at 113PM ramp in Macedonia during a 343/332 DACT Ierax scenario and it is a very rare nose art and it was worn by an M2K that had nothing against Phantoms Jonesy…

    Thanks for the information. I’m a fan of the movies so I’m interested in that nose.

    So it is only one Mirage which wore it. But what does “Mehmecikbusters” mean?
    Do you know where I could find a closer look at this logo?
    And do you know why they painted that exactly? Just for fun at that DATC?

    (and of course, I didn’t know the credit, if needed I can remove the pic from where it is hosted.)

    in reply to: What is Germany up to? #2647085
    gui
    Participant

    And Germany still wants 72 A400M and has already ordered 40 (which are enough imo and they should get 32 C-27 J instead of the other 32 A400M).

    Now Germany wants 60 A400M.

    in reply to: IAF and Nuclear Strike / Mirage-2000-V #2650868
    gui
    Participant

    One have to understand simple logic.
    Interms of Unit cost and licensing M2K is more expensive than MKI and India is buying an aircraft for 21st century not 20 the century. So it is unlikely that IAF will accept an aircraft which is less sophisticated than MKI and cost more and comes later.
    So minimum requirements are
    1. New engine either M53PX or M88-4
    2. RBE-2 AESA radar so it is more sophisticated than BAR.
    3. Aircraft made of composite material for reduce RCS and more agility.
    4. Spectra defensive suite.
    5. Assure supply of METEOR and MICA IIR and all MBDA PGMs.
    6. Aircraft should be more advance(Just imagine more advance than LCA) and a source of technolgy for Indian Indigenous programs.

    1- The M88-3 could be ready soon. About the M88-4 I don’t think it is more than something on the paper, or even in minds, and I’ve never heard of TVC for it.
    Anyway how do you want to fit a M88 into a Mirage 2000 not planned for it?

    2- That’s not because a Mirage 2000 has a Rafale nose in order to do some tests for the Rafale developement that Dassault will sell RBE-2 equiped Rafales in the future.

    3- We can’t change the agility nor the structure of the Mirage 2000. That would be a waste of time, money etc.

    4- How do you want to fit all the Spectra components (there are quite a bunch) in a little aircraft not planned to include them? (and it’s the same for many other components onboad the Rafale.)

    in reply to: Best European Airpower #2666456
    gui
    Participant

    Your statement there is the root of all problem, the history is written by the people of the country you live in. So no matter how you want to be objective your view of France is distorted.
    For example, in Japan the school children are taught that Japan did nothing wrong in WW2, or they did not really commit atrocity in China or they were the champion of Asian people over Western dominance. So when you say you know European history, you actually know only the French view of it. Unless you’ve studied history abroad, your view of what took place is not really accurate. And this also goes to anyone else who is spouting about “History of my country”

    that’s why I invited Incognito to read books written by english and american historians (check my previous posts)

    in reply to: Best European Airpower #2666892
    gui
    Participant

    In other words–danger over, de Gaulle can land and

    you don’t even read all what I write….

    Without the great de Gaulle, the liberator of France, where would France be today?

    the problem was who could make a governement – Vichy? it was on the wrong side and not representative of the population. The americans? Thousands of Free french, the resistance etc fought behind DG and all the population began to support him. So there was only one legitimate leader for France and it was him, that was my point.

    and as I can see, we, on this thread, don’t stop to blow up your stupid aguments, again and again, but you are still here, saying nonsense…. so now I don’t even know what to say, that’s endless.
    all we can see is that you don’t know a lot about what you are talking, and that you just say stupid anti French things just because you don’t like France, and we can also see that even if we prove you are wrong, you are still here trying to prove some thing or some other. That leads nowhere.

Viewing 15 posts - 61 through 75 (of 110 total)