Sorry, I disagree with both of your assumptions. First, that the IAF already operates the Mig-29 so the Mig-35 is likely. If, that was the case why hold the competition??? Second, that PAF already operates the F-16 so it would be silly to even consider the F-16 as a option for the IAF. Well, its funny the Egypt and Israel both operate F-16’s along with Greece and Turkey. Sorry, neither agruement holds much water in my opinion………….Regardless, the topic at hand is which type of F-35 (B or C) would be better suited to operate off the IAC’s.
I never said Mig35 is likely, learn to read mate. I said they have Ks (not Cs ) for their Naval needs, and i do not see the need for any other type for their limited carrier capacity. Fulcrum Ks IN version are more than capable of handling any threat Indian naval force would encounter, there is simply no need for the F35 ( VTOL or VSTOL ) in their near future, and that is from purely technical perspective.
When you then take political situation into consideration the sugestion is even more flawed. While India and US have good relationship, there is quite a bit of dislike amongst general populace and military , over US continuing to provide military aid to Pakistan. Many Indians see this as US funding militants and terrorist attacks against them.. since almost all in India, and some in West too, assume that Pak security services actually do provide support to Militants.
You also mention Egypt and Israel, its a very good example.. lets say war broke between these two.. who would get US backing?? Would they both , non or would one of the parties all of a sudden loose all technical support for their F16??
That is why i think India is not quite ready yet for major US procurement such as MRCA or naval aviation.
Honestly in my humble uninformed opinion they could do worse then to sell off their MiG29 Ks and go with Rafale both in MRCA and carrier based. 😮
Sign In
