“All Roadblocks Removed, 5th Gen Fighter Agreement Soon”: Defence Minister
The decks are cleared for a general agreement (GA) on the further joint development and production of the Indo-Russian Fifth Generation Fighter Aircraft (FGFA). After years of bilateral discussions, the agreement is finally set to be signed, possibly with the Russian President visits Delhi later this year.
After the 10th India-Russia Inter-Governmental Commission on Military Technical Cooperation (IRIGC-MTC) today in Delhi, Indian defence minister AK Antony said, “All the roadblocks are over and soon the FGFA contract will be signed. We will get 250-300 fighter aircraft. Within the next few months, the agreement will be signed. We have sorted out all issues and have found satisfactory agreements.”
Russian defence minister Anatoly Serdyukov said, “We are looking forward to the joint creation of the fifth generation fighter aircraft (FGFA) with our Indian colleagues. We have the design and other details. The draft of the contract has been handed over to the Indian side and is now under their consideration. Once the contract is signed, Sukhoi and HAL will work together.”
Bookmark and Share
http://livefist.blogspot.com/2010/10/all-roadblocks-removed-5th-gen-fighter.html
Russians may offer Il-476 for IAF’s Tanker Bid
BY: IDRW NEWS NETWORK
Facing Stiff competitions from Europeans in Indian air force tanker requirement deal , Russians seems to have considering offering Il-476 aircraft’s, which is a significantly modernized version of Russia’s Il-76 Candid transport plane, featuring a fully-digital flight control system, new avionics and PS-90A-76 engines with improved fuel efficiency systems.
European company Airbus which had won the old tender to supply their Airbus 330 MRTT for $1 billion global tender floated in 2006 by the Indian defence ministry for six refuellers . but whole tender was scrapped since finance Ministry did not give clearance to the deal . Russians had offered Il-78 MKI which IAF already operates and have six in their force , but IAF was in favor of European Airbus 330 MRTT since it described it technologically more advanced .
first Il-476 will enter Russian air force from 2012 onwards , and Russians plans to buy more then 38 of this aircraft’s to replace their aging IL-76 Transport aircraft’s , Russia will also be inducting Tanker version of the Il-476 .
This version (Il-476) can carry up to 60 tons and is about 15 percent more fuel efficient. Russia is fast running out of surplus stock which it had of IL-76 aircraft , and will start work on development of new fresh air frames , IL-76 is widely used transport aircraft Over 900 Il-76s were manufactured over the last thirty years, with nearly a hundred exported.
Indian defence ministry has re-floated tender recently ,chances of any new aircraft in race is quite low (American entry unlikely ) while improvement of aircraft can only come from Russian side said defence expert rakesh sharma .
Enhanced Ilyushin IL-76MF to Compete for Indian Transport Aircraft Requirements
On September 30th 2010, the upgraded IL-76MF heavy lift transport aircraft made its first flight in Tashkent, Uzbekistan. The IL-76MF aircraft is a modification of a mass manufactured IL-76MD military transport aircraft, and it is designed for the same transport and heavy lift purposes as the basic model of the aircraft.
This new generation plane is intended to make a strong case for sale to India as New Delhi has been acquiring U.S. C-17 and C130J Hercules aircrafts — which are more expensive than the Russian air lifter. India has an estimated requirement for over 25 military heavy lift planes over the next 10 years.
The IL-76MF the length of the aircraft fuselage was enlarged by 6.6m; more powerful and efficient PS-90A-76 engines replaced the previously installed models; the integrated piloting and navigation equipment and aircraft systems were modified and updated; a new auxiliary power unit replaced the originally installed unit.

Dimensions (external)
wing span (m) 50.5
length (overall) (m) 53.194
height (overall) (m) 14.306
wing area (m2) 300
fuselage diameter (m) 4.8
Engines
engine type PS-90A-76 by-pass turbojet engine
number of engines (pcs) 4
max take-off thrust (International Standard Atmosphere, Н=0) (kg) 4 х 16000
bypass ratio 4.4
ICAO standards compliance App.16, Ch.3
Weights and Volumes
max take-off weight (t) 210
max payload (t) 60
max fuel tanks capacity (liter) 109500
Performance
cruise speed (km/h) 830-850
range with payload (km) of 60t 4000
range with payload (km) of 40t 6200
flight altitude (m) 9000-12000
take-off run (m) 1600
landing run (m) 990
Seats
flight crew 5
EXCLUSIVE: No CISMOA? Here’s What They’re Pulling From The Indian C-130J

With India still hesitant to sign the contentious Communication Interoperability & Security Memorandum of Agreement (CISMOA) with Washington, there’s a great deal that’s been written and said — mostly speculative — about what technology the US Government will withhold from equipment already ordered by India. Several commentators have said that the American equipment on order by India — including the C-130Js and P-8 — wouldn’t be half as useful without the technologies that would come with them if India signs the CISMOA. I’ve just received the official list of gear that the US Government will NOT provide to the Indian Air Force on its C-130Js. It is important to remember that this is equipment that has specifically been asked for by India. As a result, these items will be kept off the aircraft and only “may” be fitted on the aircraft once the CISMOA is signed. Here’s the official list of equipment that India won’t get as a direct consequence of the hanging CISMOA:
* AN/ARC-222 Single Channel Ground and Airborne Radio System (SINCGARS) – Manufacured by Magnovox and administered by the US Air Force
* KV-119 IFF Digital Transponder (Mode 4 Crypto Applique) – Manufactured by Raytheon and administered by the US Air Force
* TACTERM / ANDVT Secure Voice (HF) Terminal – Administered by the US Air Force
* VINSON KY-58 Secure Voice (UHF/VHF) Module – Administered by the US Air Force
* Finally, the Rockwell-Collins AN/ARC-210(V) SATCOM Transceiver’s COMSEC/DAMA embdedded RT is replaced with an RT that has no COMSEC/SINCGARS
Sources say the Indian government has a few specific reservations about the CISMOA (I’m gathering more on this), and is not convinced that there is any particular hurry to conclude the memorandum. Recently, US PACOM chief Admiral Bob Willard said in Delhi that the CISMOA was not a pre-requisite to India accessing a lot of advanced American communications technology, though this pretty much went against the sentiment in all other diplomatic and military visits from the US.
http://livefist.blogspot.com/2010/10/exclusive-no-cismoa-heres-what-theyre.html
IAF to receive modernised planes from Ukraine
The Indian Air Force will receive two modernised An-32 light transport planes built by Ukraine this month under a $600 million deal, the biggest bilateral agreement between the two countries. The planes which were modernised by Ukraine’s Antonov state enterprise under the Ukrainian-Indian
contract for repairs will be delivered to India in October, Antonov’s President and Director-General Dmitry Kiva was quoted as saying by Russian newsagency Itar-Tass yesterday.
According to Kiva, the planes were modernised under the Ukranian-Indian contract for repairs, modernisation and extension of service life of 105 An-32 planes up to 40 years.
It is the biggest deal in the entire history of the Ukrainian-Indian relations as the sum of the contract signed in June 2009 stands at USD 600 million.
First five An-32 planes were delivered to Kiev in March 2010, followed by five more planes in June.
The first two planes were completely modernised in July, another one in September.
According to Kiva, the market capacity for the new An-32 is estimated at 45 planes.
The Antonov Kiev-based plant plans to manufacture seven An-32 planes till the year 2015, including three in 2010, three in 2011, and one in 2012.
One An-32 planes has already been manufactures, and the other two will be made till the year end, as provided in the production plan.
http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/NEWS/newsrf.php?newsid=13517
“LCA Far Ahead Of JF-17 In Contemporary Technology”: IAF Western Commander
The Indian Air Force’s Western Air Commander, Air Marshal NAK Browne, whose area of responsibility includes the northern sector with Pakistan, indicated today that the PAF JF-17 was inferior to the yet to be inducted Indian Light Combat Aircraft (LCA) Tejas. “The LCA is ahead of the JF-17 in terms of contemporary technology. It will achieve final operational capability by the end of next year. The airplane is our design, uses our software, and is fully under our control. I’m not sure what in the JF-17 is under the PAF’s control. What do you do if you don’t have access to codes,” he said.
Air Marshal Browne, a seasoned SEPECAT Jaguar pilot who has extensive experience on virtually every variant of the MiG-21 as well, was asked today if he was apprehensive that the F-16 — a contender in the MMRCA competition — was the principal air defence platform of the Pakistan Air Force. He replied, “The configuration of the F-16 on offer to the IAF is substantially different from what has been made available to the Pakistanis”.
In an interaction with reporters ahead of India’s 78th Air Force Day, Air Marshal Brown — positioned to take over as Chief of Air Staff in July next year — said, “We are aware of the new F-16 inductions by the PAF. We have a sense of what’s happening. The new F-16s they have and are getting are certainly a challenge.”
“The assymetry between the capabilities of both air forces was a certain amount in the past. That has somewhat reduced now. The PAF is going in for a fast-track induction of beyond visual range air to air missiles (BVRAAMs) and precision guided munitions (PGMs). These are things that actually tend to reduce the gap,” the officer said.
“But they won’t catch us up,” he added.
http://livefist.blogspot.com/2010/10/lca-far-ahead-of-jf-17-in-contemporary.html
How GE’s Tejas MK-II Win Affects The MMRCA. Or Doesn’t.
In a little over two months from now, the Indian Ministry of Defence will approve the Indian Air Force’s field trial evaluation report and begin commercial negotiations with what the IAF hopes will be a downselected list of vendors. Remember, the IAF has not explicitly indicated a downselect, leaving it to the MoD to understand this from the level of compliance index.
Now, there’s an overwhelming sense that India’s selection of the GE F414 engine makes things much, much clearer about the MMRCA competition, and narrows things down considerably. For clarity’s sake, variants of the F414 power the Boeing F/A-18 IN Super Hornet and the next generation Saab Gripen IN, while the Eurojet EJ200 — which lost to GE in the Tejas MK-II competition — powers the Eurofighter Typhoon.
The logic was always compelling. A dedicated licensed engine production line in the country for the Tejas MK-II would provide robust economy of scale advantages and funnel down the contenders in the MMRCA. That’s how it probably should happen, but will it? Another matter altogether. Some scenarios:
SCENARIO 1: At least six IAF officers I spoke to suggested that it would be wrong to connect the Tejas MK-II and the MMRCA on too many levels. One of them suggested that the two deals were mutually exclusive, with a sharp line dividing the two — in other words, the decision on one had no way of influencing the other. Therefore, in this scenario, the GE F414 selection provides no tangible advantages, going forward in the MMRCA, to the F/A-18 and Gripen NG, even though those advantages would normally shout loud. When I asked an Air Marshal, formerly at Eastern Air Command HQ, how this could be justified — considering how it goes headlong against the economies of scale notion — he said, “You must understand that each deal is a leverage in itself. The government can choose to draw connections and give the country the most effective deal. Or it could keep everything separate and leave all options open for maximum leverage. In my understanding, the government would not hand GE an automatic victory in the MMRCA as a default result of the Tejas MK-II selection. That is not how things happen in India.” The other crucial point here is: if the GE victory wasn’t politically premeditated, then there exists no procedural route for the Tejas MK-II engine selection to be taken into account in a potential MMRCA downselect. In other words, if the MMRCA is sticking unflinchingly to the RFP (as the Indian Defence Minister recently stated in Washington, and reiterated yesterday by Air Marshal NAK Browne, the IAF’s Western Command chief), then GE’s win would/could have no direct bearing on the MMRCA downselect simply because there is no official route for it to do so. The last critical point: the F414 engine that will be built in India under tech-transfer, will be a modified engine for the Tejas. If an F414-powered airplane happens to be selected in the MMRCA, then it is likely that there will be two lines, or a fork in the main line.
SCENARIO 2: The opposite scenario. Here, the government decides that a dedicated GE F414 engine line in the country means it makes sense to narrow down the selection based on the economies of engine scale logic. In other words, you have the Gripen going against the Super Hornet in the MMRCA finals.
SUB-SCENARIO 2 (a) But there are important points to remember here to: two extravagantly different aircraft, same engine in different configurations. The US government would obviously support the F/A-18, and GE would clearly prefer the F/A-18, since it’s American and a twin-engine platform, so it means double the number of engines sold by GE as compared to the number it would sell if India chose the Gripen. In this scenario, the GE F414 economies of scale and political considerations would push the F/A-18 to the top of the list.
SUB-SCENARIO 2 (b) In this scenario, the government decides it already has economies of scale, and pushes the Gripen forward as a perceived compromise: the cheaper aircraft, with American engine and weapons. The US cannot exercise export licensing controls on the Gripen’s GE engine since each vendor had to submit a signed affidavit before field trials that all systems listed in their bid documents were available, and needed no further approvals from any government. Remember, the IAF has said it won’t choose a twin-engine aircraft in the MMRCA, if a single-engine aircraft can “do the job”, i.e, is satisfactorily compliant on all 643 test points that each of the six airplanes were tested for during the field evaluation trials (FETs). But now it’s up to the MoD.
SCENARIO 3: In this scenario, the GE victory in the Tejas MK-II engine competition, has a reverse effect on the MMRCA, and pushes the Eurofighter Typhoon, Rafale and F-16 (the MiG-35 is all but officially confirmed to be out) to the top of the pile, since alternate engines provide their own leverage. Scenarios 2 & 3 are of course assuming the government won’t look at the Tejas MK-II and the MMRCA as “two watertight compartments” as an officer put it.
http://livefist.blogspot.com/2010/10/how-ges-tejas-mk-ii-win-affects-mmrca.html
India to get Russian nuclear submarine in March
BY: IANS
India’s undersea warfare will receive a major boost after Russia transfers its nuclear-powered K-152 Nerpa attack submarine on a 10-year lease in March next year.
The governor of the Far East Khabarovsk region told reporters in Russia on Friday that the vessel is ready.“The boat has been handed over [to the fleet] now. According to the agreement, it will be transferred to India in March next year,” Vyacheslav Shport said, as quoted by the Ria Novosti.
The $900-million lease contract was drawn up after Moscow and New Delhi sealed a deal in January 2004, in which India agreed to fund part of the Nerpa’s construction.
The 12,000-ton K-152 Nerpa, an Akula II class nuclear-powered attack submarine, was originally scheduled to be introduced into the Indian Navy as INS Chakra by mid-2008.
A crew of Indian submariners last year took part in sea trials of the submarine.
The boat, damaged in a fatal accident during tests last November, resumed sea trials last year in the Sea of Japan after extensive repairs.
On Nov 8, 2008, while the Nerpa was undergoing sea trials in the Sea of Japan, its on-board fire suppression system activated, releasing a deadly gas into the sleeping quarters. Three crewmembers and 17 shipyard workers were killed.
Akula II class vessels are considered the quietest and deadliest of all Russian nuclear-powered attack submarines.
China tests renovated airfields and runways with Su-30 along Indian Border
BY: bharatglobe.com
India will upgrade IAF’s Nyoma advanced landing ground (ALG) in Ladakh into a full-fledged air base closer to the borders with China to deploy its top-notch fighter jets including the Sukhois there.
The proposal for modernising the compact airstrip at Nyoma, just 23 kilometres from the Line of Actual Control (LAC) with China, has gone to the Defence Ministry for approval, IAF’s Western Air Command chief Air Marshal N A K Browne told a press conference here on Friday.“Nyoma ALG is to be expanded into a major base and a proposal in this regard has been sent to the government. It is being currently examined actively by the Defence Ministry. If the approval comes today, it would take about four years to get it ready as a major base,” Browne said.
“When we look at developing a base, in our view we have to be able to operate each and every platform of the Air Force at that base. It will not be confined to one or two types of aircraft alone,” he said to a query if Sukhois could be deployed there permanently.
Stepping up its military activities in Tibet, the Chinese PLA has carried out a major exercise there with its Air Force that for the first time saw Sukhoi-30s being pressed into action. By operating Su-30s, the Chinese military was also able to test recently renovated airfields and runways.
As per Indian assessment, there are now seven airfields in Tibet from where Su-30s can operate. Two of these have been built recently.
While the exercise took place about two months ago, details have begun to emerge only recently and formed part of a detailed security review undertaken by Defence Minister A K Antony a few days ago. The Cabinet Committee on Security was also kept informed. The armed forces were of the view that there was no major cause for worry as India was also upgrading its capabilities.
From what is known so far, this was a division-level exercise but was also ambitious because the PLA had moved a mechanised formation into Tibet for this purpose. This mechanised outfit is essentially part of the Rapid Reaction Force which have been developed by the PLA to cope with future “small-scale, high intensity regional combat and military operations”.
IAF helicopters to return from UN mission by month end
BY: Press Trust Of India
The IAF helicopters currently serving in UN missions in Congo and Sudan will return to India beginning this month-end, primarily to augment the transport fleet and in support of the Army in desert terrains along the borders with Pakistan. “The IAF helicopters in United Nations mission will be
coming back by end of October,” Western Air Command Air Officer Commanding-in-Chief Air Marshal N A K Browne told a press conference.
On an IAF proposal citing its helicopter fleet being stretched to its limits, the Defence Ministry wrote to the External Affairs Ministry in June this year that the 17 Mi-17 medium lift helicopter, eight Mi-35 and Mi-25 attack in the UN missions in Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and Sudan should be de-inducted and brought back for internal security duties.
While the Mi-17s are likely to augment the transport fleet of the IAF in view of four such helicopters busy serving in logistics role in the country’s anti-Naxal operations in central India, the attack helicopters would be used to provide support roles to the Army troops deployed in the deserts of Rajasthan along the Indo-Pak borders.
“The Mi-35s will get back to Suratgarh, its home base. These will be refurbished and re-painted (in IAF colours). Gradually there will be a build of the fleet in the Suratgarh unit,” Browne said.
Suratgarh will also become home for a Mi-17IV unit in May-June next year, as part of the IAF’s plans to strengthen the transport helicopter fleet in the deserts, he added.
Mi-17IVs will also be based in Srinagar in Jammu and Kashmir following the Suratgarh deployment.
“Our resources have been stretched to the limit, particularly the helicopter fleet. For six to seven years, they have been deployed in the UN peace-keeping missions. They have taken a huge amount of workload over the years. So the Air Maintenance headquarters felt we should get these back in time and use them within India itself,” Browne said on the justification for recalling the helicopters from Congo and Sudan.
He clarified that the attack helicopters, got back from UN, would not be used in the anti-Naxal operations. “These attack helicopters are not for use in the anti-Naxal operations. No,” he replied to a query in this regard, pointing out that these helicopters would be used only for supporting the troops in deserts.
Browne said the attack helicopter’s task had increased within India and there was “tremendous amount” of need to get more more helicopters for use by the IAF internally.
He said the 80 Mi-17 helicopters being bought from Russia was for supplementing the air force’s transport tasks and in aid of civilian authorities for flood relief and casualty evacuation.

[QUOTE]
[/QUStrategic Long Range Bombers : Mission Accomplished .
BY: NJS security Editorial Panel For Security Magazine
The Long range aerospace power of today’s air force is a potent force deterrence of both conventional and nuclear conflict, long range bombers platforms are able to Conventionally destroy multiple target per sortie. Creating desired effects at the strategic operational and tactical levels simultaneously .
If we compare major super power’s in world like US and Russia has major role in it, for ex ., B-52 , B-1 and B-2 is considered to be backbone of US air force for Longer range strategic Operations , on other hand Russia the former Soviet union has large arsenal of long Range strategic bombers like Tu-95 bear , Tu-22 M3 Backfire ,Tu-160 Blackjack for its Nuclear and conventional role. The Tu-160 is also significantly larger and faster than the B-1B and has a greater combat range with 7,300 km along with service ceiling 49,200 ft and maximum speed of Mach 2.05 .
As per report Twenty B-2s are operated by the USAF . which is “low observable” stealth technology designed to penetrate dense anti-aircraft defenses , B-2s were first used in combat to drop bombs on Serbia during the Kosovo War and US also continued in Iraq and Afghanistan wars .
As per India which has many powerful neighbors on boarder side ,which need decent volume of longer range bombers , but has only 4 nos Tu-22 M3 backfire for Land attack purpose , which has been rented from Russia in year 2004 from its instant stockpile . These bombers are totally different from normal fighter jets could be used for more longer range with better payload for guided /unguided weapons to strike deep inside enemy territory . Some official news also confirms
china is already manufacturing massive nos of Tu 22 m3 backfire version for its airforce / Naval purpose with 100 % Transfer of Technology from Russia .
India already ordered 8 nos of P8I Poseidon long range ship / Submarine attack Naval based Aircraft from Boeing to replace its old Russian Naval bombers , As for Airforce we Still Need more Land attack bombers like Tu-160 Blackjack which is considered to be superior to other Strategic Bombers . India should
Realize the need of Strategic bombers incase of war (period) against Red Giant .
The deal to lease 4 TU-22M3 never materialized.So India doesn’t have these aircrafts. So this piece of info is wrong.

