dark light

black eagle

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 91 through 105 (of 233 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Indian navy – news folder July 2007 #2046757
    black eagle
    Participant

    L&T set to build warships for navy

    The engineering firm is the only private sector entity to hold a licence from the government to build warships

    P. Manoj

    Going after the government’s planned Rs50,000 crore investment for warships, India’s largest engineering and construction firm Larsen & Toubro Ltd (L&T) plans to build defence warships and para-military vessels at its proposed shipyard at Kattupalli, in Tamil Nadu, to cater to the needs of the Indian Navy.
    “L&T plans to enter the defence shipbuilding sector. The proposed shipbuilding facility at Kattupalli will build defence ships also, apart from general cargo ships and jack-up rigs for the offshore oil industry. L&T is the only entity in the private sector that holds a licence from the government to build warships,” said a person familiar with the thinking, who did not want to be named.
    The Union government plans to invest Rs50,000 crore over the next 10 years to build warships for the navy.
    Garden Reach Shipbuilders & Engineers Ltd, Goa Shipyard Ltd and Mazagon Dock Ltd are authorized to build warships. All the three yards are state-owned entities controlled by the Union ministry of defence.
    Cochin Shipyard Ltd, controlled by the Union ministry of shipping, has licence to build air defence ships.
    L&T’s defence division already makes ancillary equipment for ships, such as propulsion steering gears and shafts. “Building ships for the Indian Navy is just an extension of this business,” the same person said. The dry docks and jetties at the Kattupalli yard, used for building civilian ships, will be utilized for making warships as well. “But the processes and management will be separate and each business will function as an independent cost and profit centre,” said the person.
    L&T plans to bid for the navy’s submarine building programme, dubbed Project 75 and 76, which involves building 24 submarines with an investment of $14-16 billion (Rs55,580-63,520 crore).
    D. Morada, a spokesman for L&T, declined to comment for this story.
    India has already signed a $3.5 billion deal with French-firm DCNS, or Direction des Constructions Navales Services, to acquire six Scorpene class submarines in October 2005, out of the total 24 submarines in the navy’s project.
    The project included a licensed production of submarines in India under a technology transfer agreement, which was awarded to the state-owned Mazagon Dock. L&T had unsuccessfully bid for this project.
    L&T plans to participate in the project when the navy invites requests for proposals to build the balance 18 vessels locally. L&T may team up with a domestic state-owned firm or a foreign partner if it wins the tender, the person said.
    L&T will also form a joint venture (JV) company with the Tamil Nadu government to build the shipyard-cum-port facility at Kattupalli, just 2km from the Union government-owned Ennore port.
    The state government will hold 2-3% stake in the JV company that will develop India’s biggest shipbuilding facility, capable of constructing very large crude tankers that can carry 300,000-350,000 tonnes of crude oil and Suezmax vessels, which can carry 120,000 tonnes of dry bulk cargoes such as coal, iron ore and steel, and are called thus because they can pass through the Suez Canal.
    L&T will invest close to Rs3,000 crore to build the shipyard-cum-port facility. When fully operational, the shipyard is likely to employ close to 10,000 people.
    The port will cater to clean cargoes and also handle project cargoes of the nearby special economic zone being developed by the state government-owned Tamil Nadu Industrial Development Corp. Ltd.
    L&T plans to begin construction of ships by end-2009, with plans to deliver the first ship by 2010-11.

    in reply to: IAF news-discussion July-September 2007 #2507907
    black eagle
    Participant

    With MiG 25’s gone, Sukhois to become eye in the sky

    The Indian Air Force (IAF) would soon be getting new snooping capabilities along the eastern border with a squadron of Su-30 MKI fighters being prepared for special reconnaissance missions.

    A year after the mighty MiG-25 spy planes were phased out of service at the Bareilly airbase, the latest fighters in IAF’s inventory are being fitted with Israeli reconnaissance systems that will help them look more than 300 km inside Chinese territory without crossing the border.

    A team of experts from Israel Aerospace Industries (IAI) will shortly visit the airbase to integrate the Elta Reconnaissance System on the fighters and help set up a ground receiving station to collect live images being taken by the aircraft, a senior IAF officer confirmed.

    “With the MiG-25’s gone, there was a gap in surveillance capabilities. The (Bareilly-based) 24 Squadron has now been tasked with reconnaissance duties and will shortly be fitted with recon pods,” the officer said, adding that reconnaissance will be just one of the many roles tasked to the squadron.

    The new systems being fitted on the aircraft will enable them to map out the enemy territory at a rate of 50,000 sq km per hour and send back live images to the airbase for interpretation.

    A state-of-the-art receiving station to process the images will also be set up at Bareilly, which is being developed as a hub for the Su-30 MKI fighters on the eastern front. While the airbase already houses a squadron of the latest Phase III version of the fighters, another squadron is currently being raised for deployment along the eastern border.

    “Bareilly is strategically located and we are converting it into a hub for Su-30 MKI fighters. Another squadron, No 8 The Pursuits, is being re-equipped with the fighters and will also be based here,” Group Captain PV Gadgil, Chief Operations Officer of the airbase, told The Indian Express.

    Other than the data receiving stations, a world class avionics lab has been established at the airbase for second line repair and inspection of equipment on board the aircraft. “The largest fighter aircraft hangar in the country is coming up at the base where eight Sukhois can be serviced at the same time. A service support centre to maintain the aircraft is also being constructed,” said Group Captain Rajiv Gandhotra, Chief Engineering Officer (CEO) of the base.

    The IAF is looking at deploying the aircraft at the Tezpur airbase next year once sufficient numbers of the fighters arrive from Russia.

    http://www.idrw.org/2007/09/30/with_mig_25vs_gone_sukhois_to_become_eye_in_the_sky.html

    in reply to: IAF news-discussion July-September 2007 #2518791
    black eagle
    Participant

    Shakti-powered Dhruv helicopter to fly today

    Shakti-powered Dhruv helicopter to fly today

    Bangalore: With the first official flight of the Shakti-powered Advanced Light Helicopter (ALH) Dhruv scheduled to take off on Thursday, designer-manufacturer of the helicopter, the Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL), is undoubtedly euphoric.

    Two helicopters, one with a glass cockpit and powered by the Shakti, and another with air-to-air missiles, rockets and turret guns will fly past an audience that will include the Secretary (Defence Production).

    On Friday, the helicopters will demonstrate their capabilities to the Chief of Army Staff General J.J. Singh. The Army is the Dhruv’s biggest customer having received a majority of the 70-odd helicopters.

    Until now, the Dhruvs have been powered by the French-built Turbomeca 333 2B2 engine, but the Shakti which has been developed jointly by the HAL and Turbomeca has over 20 per cent more power. The power will serve the helicopter well when it is used by the defence forces at high altitude as well as in hot, dry and humid conditions.

    But with questions having been raised by the three service chiefs over Dhruv’s fleet serviceability and with issues over the supply of spares, HAL will have to pull out all the stops if they are to satisfy their customers. According to HAL chairman Ashok Baweja, problems over the Dhruv’s fleet serviceability and spares are a thing of the past.

    Speaking to The Hindu, Mr. Baweja said that there had been a time a few months ago when HAL had been busy equipping their helicopters with glass cockpits (rather than the conventional instrumentation systems) and this could have cau sed a few minor delays.

    “All fleets have these problems. This is nothing unusual. The ALH’s supply lines are working fine.”

    Highlighting the light-weight Dhruv’s matchless ability to operate at high altitude (6 km) and its unique offset flapping hinges, Mr Baweja said that HAL had orders (for the Dhruv) till 2015-16.

    A number of countries especially Turkey, Chile, Venezuela and Bolivia have also evinced interest in the civilian variant of the Dhruv.
    Glass cockpits

    HAL has equipped all the Dhruvs that were produced during the 2006-07 financial year with glass cockpits, switching from the multi dialled conventional instrumentation system to one that has just four MFDs (multi-function displays).

    These Dhruvs, which have been inducted into the Army Aviation Corps’ 203 squadron, offer pilots information at their fingertips, besides decreasing workload and increasing man-machine interface.

    http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/NEWS/newsrf.php?newsid=9302

    in reply to: Indian Air Force News & Discussion June- Aug 2006 #2526379
    black eagle
    Participant

    India’s first space varsity takes off in August

    India’s first space university is all set to take wings next month seeking to groom tailor-made experts to fuel the country’s satellite and rocket programmes.

    “August middle is our target”, said G Madhavan Nair, Chairman of the Indian Space Research Organisation, which is setting up the Indian Institute of Space Science and Technology (IIST) and expected to meet the high technology requirements of ISRO.

    It would initially operate from the campus of the Vikram Sarabhai Space Centre at Thiruvananthapuram, a lead centre of ISRO, which will create a full-fledged infrastructure for IIST on a picturesque site in Ponmudi near the Kerala capital in about two years.

    The Institute, which offers technically tuned courses in space science and technology, has already attracted some of India’s bright minds encouraging India’s space agency.

    “The response is really good. Original plan was to take from the so-called extended list of IIT JEE. But we could see large number of applicants from the main list of IIT itself”, Nair told PTI in an interview.

    ISRO sources said around 150 students were expected to be enrolled in aeronautical and avionics engineering and integrated MSc in space sciences in the first academic year.

    Nair said ISRO came up with the idea of setting up of the institute as it was faced with a “very alarming situation” in terms of attracting the right talent for India’s space programmes.

    Most of the students who come out of IIT and IISc etc� they go to either Management, IT or abroad. So, they are not available to the Indian scientific community,” Nair said.

    The Bangalore-based ISRO gets 70,000-plus applications annually from students of other institutions, from which it’s able to short-list around 1,500 by way of written tests.

    “In the final selection process, we are not able to get even 200. On an average, we require about 300. This has been a very alarming situation. We don’t want to dilute quality”, the Chairman of the Space Commission said.

    Nair said this “difficult process” actually becomes a real hunt for talent at the country-level.

    “We cannot take the marks given by institutions and engineering colleges. We are forced to conduct our own test and finally we get only a handful of people. So, this is not a very healthy situation.

    “So, we thought we need to plan something unique; catch the students right at the young age itself, at the Plus 2 level (class 12)”, Nair, also Secretary in the Department of Space, said.

    “They will be taught in propulsion, aerodynamics, navigation, guidance, sub-systems, avionics, control systems and so on”, he said. “So, that way, as soon as they come out of the Institute, they will be usable by us”.

    ISRO has totally subsidised the education and the students passing out of the IIST are required to serve the space agency for five years. If not, they would have to pay the bond amount.

    http://www.idrw.org/2007/07/22/indias_first_space_varsity_takes_off_in_august.html

    in reply to: Indian navy – news folder July 2007 #2055210
    black eagle
    Participant

    L&T plans to build submarines for Navy

    Larsen and Toubro, the diversified engineering conglomerate, is planning to build submarines as part of its defence projects venture. The company is planning to demerge the defence division into a separate entity.

    Sources close to the development said L&T is in talks with a couple of foreign firms to develop required expertise to participate in the Indian Navy’s prestigious Project 75 and 76 to make underwater vessels.

    The project is one of Navy’s 30-year sub-building programme. It aims to build 24 such vessels to meet challenges across the Indian Ocean. The project cost is estimated at around $14-16 billion.

    “The company has received approval for the second line of submarines. L&T is planning to either co-ordinate with the state-owned firms or with a foreign partner to enter the project,” sources said.

    A Delhi-based defence analyst said Navy has already signed a deal with French company DCNS for submarines and is planning to build the remaining 18 vessels indigenously. L&T is planning to enter this phase with a domestic or foreign partner.

    In 2005 October, India signed a $3.5 billion deal with DCNS to acquire six Scorpene class submarines. The project included a license production of submarines in India under a technology transfer agreement with the state-owned Mazagone Docks.

    L&T Chairman and Managing Director AM Naik said the company had tried to partner with the Mazagon Docks for the Scorpene project. “However, at that time the collaboration did not materialise. We are interested in entering the submarine project. We have the required expertise and after getting the Raksha Udyog Ratna status, we will be in a better position to bid for the future projects,” Naik said.

    L&T is building Pinaka rocket launchers for two regiments of Indian army and is bidding for modernisation of Bofors guns. It is in talks with global players including the European Aeronautics Defence and Space Company (EADS), the parent firm of European airplane maker Airbus for a joint venture. L&T’s revenue from the defence sector was at Rs 3,000 crore in the last fiscal.

    L&T has already received a Rs 440 crore order for making four ships for Rotterdam-based Zadeko. The company is planning to invest Rs 2,000 crore for a new green field shipyard that will make all types of vessels including CNG, LNG carriers and containers.

    http://www.idrw.org/2007/07/22/lt_plans_to_build_submarines_for_navy.html

    in reply to: Indian Missile news and speculations #1796041
    black eagle
    Participant

    is that a NIRBHAY pic?

    in reply to: Indian Air Force News & Discussion June- Aug 2006 #2526388
    black eagle
    Participant

    India to buy more Russian spy planes

    To bolster Navy’s reconnaissance capabilities, India is to buy more IL-38 spy planes from Russia and the decks for the supply would be cleared during Naval Chief Admiral Arun Prakash’s weeklong visit to Moscow starting on Monday.

    Navy plans to buy two more IL-38 maritime reconnaissance aircraft from the Russia to strengthen its depleted spy plane fleet hit by crashes of the IL-38 aircraft.

    The new planes to be purchased would be the upgraded version of the aircraft fitted with advanced Sea Dragons suits.

    The new aircraft are likely to be supplied by next year and would join Navy’s already purchased new fleet of three IL-38 aircraft. Navy’s plans to buy eight more advanced maritime reconnaissance aircraft and has already floated international tenders for it.

    Three major companies US Lockheed Martin offering their upgraded version P3C orions, Boeing P8 jet and Russian Irkut company offering their IL-38 have responded to the Naval Request for Proposal (RFP).

    Admiral Arun Prakash’s visit, which follows the recent visit to Moscow by Air Chief SP Tyagi, was aimed to take “stock and review” of the ongoing Indo-Russian armament programme including the progress of the upgradation and retrofitting of the aircraft carrier Admiral Groshkov and carrier-borne 16 Mig-29K fighters India has already contracted for, naval sources said.

    http://www.idrw.org/2007/07/22/india_to_buy_more_russian_spy_planes.html

    in reply to: IAF News & Discussion Feb-Mar 07 #2544861
    black eagle
    Participant

    Defence Acquisition Committee To Issue RFP For Air Force MRCA Deal Within 15 Days

    The Defence Acquisition Committee (DAC) will meet in a fortnight to decide on the Request for Proposal (RFP) for the acquisition of 126 jet fighters by the Indian Air Force, Defence Minister A K Antony said today.

    “The DAC will be meeting within a fortnight and decide on the RFP. All negotiations are over and now it is a question of formalities,” he told reporters when asked about the delay in issuing the RFP document for the multi-million dollar acquisition programme.

    He said the RFP was likely to be issued within “one or two months”. Earlier too, Antony has maintained that the RFP would be issued within two months.

    Asked whether the Defence Ministry was “worried” about the acquisition of airpower by the LTTE, he said “we are watching that. We are not worried, but are concerned. A terrorist organisation gaining this kind of capability is a matter of concern”.

    On Sri Lanka, he said India had the “most cordial relations with the country. We are committed to its sovereignty, unity and integrity”.

    To Colombo’s request for the supply of radars and other equipment to help them in their fight against LTTE, he said “We will support them in whatever help they need”. He also pointed out that the ultimate solution to the ethnic problem was not military but a political solution.

    Asked why the budgetary resources of the Ministry remained unspent in the last fiscal, Antony said the Defence Procurement Policy was approved in September 2006, bringing in new procedures and rules. “There was a certain delay, but we will fulfil the targets this year,” he asserted.

    http://www.india-defence.com/reports-3324

    in reply to: IAF News & Discussion Feb-Mar 07 #2544865
    black eagle
    Participant

    Indo-UK exercises to see Sukhois battle next-gen fighters

    The Indian Air Force’s frontline Sukhoi-30MKI multi-role aircraft will cross swords with next generation fighters during the upcoming Indo-UK joint fighter exercises to be held in England early next month.

    Eight Sukhoi-30MKI fighters, which have the reputation of having outwitted American F-16 fighters earlier would be pitted against the new Generation Eurofighter Typhoon during the ten-day exercises ‘Indra Danush-07’ to be held at Royal Air Force base in Wadington in central England from July 2 to 12, according to IAF sources here.

    A contingent of eight SU-30MKI, two IL-78 mid-air refuellers and two IL-76 transport aircraft would leave their Pune base on June 24 for the joint exercises. This would be the second of the series of joint air exercises between Royal Air Force and Indian Air Force.

    During the earlier exercise held over the Gwalior air base, the Royal Air Force had pitted their Tornado fighters against IAF Sukhoi’s, Mig-29 and Mirage 2000.

    Though IAF fighters and pilots had matched their skills against F-16s during joint air exercises with US and Singapore air forces, this would be the first time that Indian pilots would come up against next generation fighters.

    Typhoons have just been inducted into the Royal Air Force and along with Swedish SAAB company’s Grippen fighters are two of the most advanced fighters in the world.

    Both Eurofighter Typhoon and Swedish Grippen are bidding for India’s contract to purchase 126 multi-role fighter aircraft.

    IAF chief Air Chief Marshal Fali Homi Major would witness the exercises as he embarks on an official visit to United Kingdom from July 10 to 14.

    http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/NEWS/newsrf.php?newsid=8811

    in reply to: IAF News & Discussion Feb-Mar 07 #2545322
    black eagle
    Participant

    Indo-Russian Defense Ties: Trouble Brewing Underneath
    http://www.india-defence.com/reports-3319

    Deep historical ties and high volume trade apart, serious challenges confront Indo-Russian Defense Ties

    NUCLEAR SUBMARINES, Heavy Battle Tanks, Fighter Jets and Aircraft Carriers – this is a just partial list of the current defence trade items between India & Russia, which is estimated to be worth upto $10 billion by 2010. For three decades and more, Russia has been, and today still is, India’s largest trading partner.

    The Russian defence industry, which used to enjoy a huge monopoly in the Indian market, has however in recent times found it very hard to hold on to its market share. Since 1992, when India and Israel established full diplomatic ties, Israel has grown exponentially to become India’s second largest defense partner expected to overtake Russia in coming years. European and American defense companies are too making the most of the ‘liberalization’ of Indian Defense. And if competition from Western Defence giants was not enough, the growing thaw in Indo-Russian defence relations is making it even harder for Russia to maintain its dominance in Indian defence.

    BrahMos – Indo Expo 2006 Fiasco

    The friction first became public when, for the first time, Russian missile makers accused the BrahMos Aerospace Pvt. Ltd. of using unfair marketing practices for the promotion of the PJ-10 BrahMos Supersonic cruise missile. Brahmos Ltd. is a Joint Venture between India and Russia and manufactures state-of-the-art cruise missiles suitable for land, sea and air based launch platforms.

    The spat occurred in a defense exhibition held in Indonesia (Indo Expo 2006) as marketing initiatives of BrahMos clearly overshadowed all of the Russian missile exhibitors. Accusations were exchanged to-and-fro but the incident highlighted the growing friction between the Indian and Russian defence industry.

    Russia had always viewed India as a perennial market and signs of India becoming an equal competitor was not being taken very well in Moscow. And instead of fair and healthy competition, the Russians resorted to allegations, accusations and political/diplomatic maneuvering. The first signs of Russia’s growing incompatibility with India’s evolving defense industry.

    Cost Reviews for Concluded Deals

    In May 2007, Russia pushed for an overall review of all defence deals signed between the two nations. Russia lobbied passionately for increasing the price even for deals that were already signed. The Russians cited the appreciating Rouble vis-a-vis the U.S. Dollar, and while the Russian concerns would force them to increase the price of upcoming deals, their desire to review the price of deals already concluded did not go down too well with the Indian Ministry of Defence.

    The prevailing feeling is that Russia has not acknowledged the fact that India’s options today are far greater than when Russia enjoyed a monopoly in the Indian market back in the 70’s, 80’s and early 90’s. Today India can purchase European, American and Israeli arms and neither finances nor diplomatic ties are an hindrance. India does enjoy excellent ties with traditionally U.K. and France and the relations with the United States have made rapid strides in recent years with India & the U.S. having signed significant strategic agreements in recent years.
    Cost Overruns & Delays

    Despite numerous denials and attempted cover-ups by the Indian Navy, the Defense Minister had to acknowledge and confirm media reports that the Admiral Gorskhov/INS Vikramaditya deal was facing cost overruns and potential delays. The reports initially appeared in Russian and then Indian media outlets and the Navy tried first denying and then scaling down the scale of problems but the Defence Ministers statement was all but a confession for the same.

    This is not the first major defence deal with Russia to face such problems. The Indian Army’s MBT T-90S is also facing major issues wrt munitions, suspension and overall performance in the Indian desert conditions. Some in the Armed Force have a preference for non Russian arms and such can be understood given the track record so far.

    As a result many of India’s current purchases from Russia have multi-national inputs for example the Air Force Sukhoi 30 MKI fighter jet deal has a great deal of Indian and Israeli systems embedded on the Russian Su-30 platform. The PHALCON AWACS deal too is of a similar nature.

    Russians & the Integrity Pact

    In 2006, the MOD released a Defence Procurement Manual which prominently contained an Integrity Pact which barred bidders from using middle men aka. defence agents to win national contract. In a surprising admission, the Russian side informed MOD that some clauses in the Integrity Pact were “conflicting” with Russian domestic laws and that they wouldn’t sign the same.

    Under the Integrity Pact, if it is found that either side had agents or paid commissions then criminal cases can be initiated by India and the other side has to cooperate. Arms dealers are banned under the defence procurement policy 2006. April 2007 saw intense negotiations between the Ministry of Defence and Russian representatives to ensure that the latter’s stand do not “delay” India’s defence modernization and massive procurement programmes; but then delays were witnessed for one reason or another in almost all major defence deals with Russia.

    Future Trends

    The Russians so far have come off to be pretty inefficient and rather combative despite enjoying a major stake of the Indian defence pie. Instead of leveraging their present position as the dominant player, they’ve creating openings for Israelis, Americans and Europeans to venture. Even CIS states such as Ukraine and Kazakhstan have won defence deals with India where Russia failed to seize the initiative.

    While Russia will continue to be a major partner for India in the coming decades, the Russian industry needs to learn to compete with the West, the Israelis and domestic defense players if it chooses to be dominant in coming years. The fact remains that the defence market today is a buyers market and that India is one of the largest defense importers in the world.

    in reply to: IAF News & Discussion Feb-Mar 07 #2545332
    black eagle
    Participant

    US firm ready to offer hi-tech radar for Indian fighter jets

    US defence major Raytheon is open to offering its sophisticated Active Electronically Scanned Array radar capable of tracking targets in the air and on the ground for India’s fighter jet fleet provided the US government approves such a move, a top official of the company has said.

    The technology and its applications can be adapted for different platforms, including new aircraft like the Light Combat Aircraft, and retrofitted on older aircraft like the Indian Air Force’s existing fleet of jets, said Michael Henchey, director of business development for Raytheon’s Tactical Airborne Systems.

    “The technology is scalable and we could scale the electronic antenna of the AESA radar to put it in the LCA,” Henchey told PTI in Paris on the sidelines of the Paris Air Show.

    He, however, made it clear that the transfer of such technology would depend totally on negotiations between the Indian and US governments as well as the level of AESA radar technology that Washington would be willing to share with New Delhi.

    “It would all depend on the country to country negotiations,” he said adding, the US State Department and the Pentagon would have to give their approval for such a proposal.

    Unlike conventional radars, AESA radars can track dozens of targets on the ground and transmit the information to ground stations and other aircraft to provide a near real time picture of the battlefield.

    They can also be used in an electronic warfare role. The AESA radar also forms a key part of the US’ efforts to pitch the F-16 and F-18 combat jets for India’s planned purchase of 126 fighters.

    Henchey said the AESA radar had been fitted to the US Air Force’s [Images] F-15s in 2000 and the US Navy’s F/A-18s would be equipped with it by next year.

    “In December last year, US jets equipped with AESA radars made a map of an area and transmitted the file to the ground in less than a tenth of a second,” he said.

    Raytheon, he said, was also looking to partner Indian defence firms in view of New Delhi’s 30 per cent offsets policy for all defence deals worth over Rs 300 crore.

    “We have already tied up with Tata Power and will announce some more partnerships with Indian firms later this year,” said Henchey.

    http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/NEWS/newsrf.php?newsid=8807

    in reply to: IAF News & Discussion Feb-Mar 07 #2533109
    black eagle
    Participant

    bharat-rakshak.com/NEWS/newsrf.php?newsid=8660

    IAF’s Sukhoi SU-30 jets lack EW system

    The Indian Air Force’s Sukhoi SU-30 combat jets lack an electronic warfare (EW) system, parliament was informed on Wednesday.

    The EW system was not incorporated in the fighter as it was ‘not identified’ in the 1996 contract for purchasing the aircraft from Russia, Defence Minister A.K. Antony said in a written reply in the Rajya Sabha.

    The EW system is also not incorporated in the SU-30s being manufactured in India under license by Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL), the minister added.

    The IAF currently operates two squadrons (40 aircraft) of Su-30s that were inducted in 2004. Delays in its licensed manufacture here have prompted the IAF to place an order for another 40 aircraft.

    Antony said: ‘The general contract of December, 2000 was signed with Russia for manufacture of SU-30 aircraft by HAL as per the Standard of Preparation (SOP) for direct purchased aircraft contracted by MoD (ministry of defence) in 1996.

    ‘Electronic warfare system was not included in the general contract because the system was not identified for the aircraft at that time.

    ‘The Su-30 aircraft manufactured by HAL under licence is of the same SOP as that of stage III aircraft supplied directly by Russia,’ the minister added.

    Antony also said HAL planned to establish facilities for repairing and overhauling the SU-30 by 2008.

    The aircraft would become due for overhaul from 2010 onwards.

    in reply to: Indian Missile news and speculations #1798799
    black eagle
    Participant

    Indian Army for more NAG trials

    Nag has in principle been accepted by the Army and has issued a trial directive for conduct of user trials. Induction will follow soon after. The transfer of technology has been completed from DRDO to a production agencies.

    NAG has a tandem warhead designed to defeat Explosive Reactive Armour (ERA) protected Main Battle Tank’s (MBT) in both top and front attack modes. The warhead has been proved against ERA protected Reactive Hull Armor (RHA) target at various angles of attack viz 45 degree, 65 degree and 67 degree.

    In addition a 2 dimensional thermal infrared target has been developed for NAG trials. Imaging infrared (IIR) seeker based filtering, guidence and control system design methodolgy has been established for NAG ATMG land system.

    The Nag Missile Carrier (NAMICA) version NAG Anti Tank Guided Missile (ATMG) has also been tested against tank turret with zero miss distance. Commander cupola of NAMICA also has a remote controlled firing station for 7.62mm gun . It uses an electro mechanical drive for providing gun laying in elevation and azimuth. NAMICA MK-II nowfeatures an automatic NBC system.

    NAG also features composites on air frame shells, ablative components, wings and fins.

    http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/NEWS/newsrf.php?newsid=8625

    in reply to: Indian Missile news and speculations #1799044
    black eagle
    Participant

    Russia’s GLONASS satellite navigation system runs into problems

    The Global Navigation Satellite System (GLONASS) is a radio-based satellite navigation system developed by the Soviet Union and now operated for the Russian government by the national Space Force. It is the Russian counterpart of the United States’ Global Positioning System (GPS).

    GLONASS has both military and civilian applications and is a graphic example of how space technology can be put to work back on Earth.

    In late March, a meeting of the State Council Presidium held in Kaluga, a town southwest of Moscow, discussed the national space program. President Vladimir Putin, who chaired the meeting, said the commissioning of the GLONASS system is a top national priority and expressed hope that the system will start operating this year.

    First Deputy Prime Minister Sergei Ivanov, a likely candidate to succeed Putin, said the operational GLONASS cluster will have at least 18 satellites before the year is out and will cover the whole of Russia. Ivanov oversees the development of the GLONASS system together with the Space Force and the Federal Space Agency (Roskosmos).

    On April 9, Roskosmos Director Anatoly Perminov told the International Satellite Navigation Forum that Russia planned to launch six revamped spacecraft this year and to bring the number of GLONASS satellites to 24 in 2009. He said the GLONASS system would then be able to cater to users all over the world.

    Unfortunately, the GLONASS project still faces major problems. The Russian mission control center said only 12 out of the 19 GLONASS satellites now in orbit are currently operating. Four more satellites now orbiting the Earth may be commissioned in the future, enlarging the GLONASS cluster to 16 spacecraft.

    However, only seven of these are revamped Uragan-M satellites, whereas the rest are obsolete spacecraft, whose service life has either expired or will expire soon.

    Quite possibly, all old spacecraft may stop functioning by late 2008. In this case Russia will have to launch 17 new satellites by the end of 2009. And working out the required launch schedule would be a mind-boggling task.

    Moreover, to launch spacecraft in space is only part of the problem. It takes several months to commission them. Of three spacecraft launched in December 2006, one has not been activated yet. Some satellites were commissioned only eight months after launch.

    Nevertheless, in line with the president’s instruction, all 24 GLONASS satellites will have to be deployed by 2009. With this aim in view older satellites are sometimes shut off in order to extend their service life, in order to report at the right time that the system is ready for operation. But this does not necessarily mean that the entire system will function without a hitch. It is also unclear whether the GLONASS system can be used on a global scale.

    Each of the three GLONASS orbital planes will have eight satellites. The U.S. GPS cluster, which also has 24 spacecraft, plus five stand-by satellites, will eventually increase to 48.

    Some elements of the GLONASS cluster, which has no stand-by satellites, are regularly deactivated for maintenance purposes. In fact, the system has not operated at full capacity since 1995 and therefore has not been able to cover the entire world.

    One of the 24 satellites flies just above the horizon and so cannot be seen. With its 18 spacecraft GLONASS will only ensure uninterrupted ship and airplane traffic, while other users will have to wait for two hours or more. For this reason, it is unlikely that GLONASS could operate on the GPS-dominated Russian navigation services market in the next five to ten years.

    Russian Transport Minister Igor Levitin said only about 1,200 of Russia’s 5,000 airliners have navigation equipment, mostly GPS receivers (92%); GLONASS receivers account for the remaining 8%.

    Although Sergei Ivanov is in charge of the system’s development, President Putin has aptly remarked that no one is directly responsible for the end result and for the system’s ground segment. Moreover, Russian enterprises have not yet mastered batch production of user-friendly navigation equipment.

    The situation is reminiscent of the COSPAS-SARSAT project, an international satellite-based search and rescue system, established by Canada, France, the United States and the former U.S.S.R. in 1979. The COSPAS-SARSAT cluster was fully deployed in 1995, but production of navigating equipment remained a problem. There are now about 660,000 locator beacons operating in the world, but there are only several hundred Russian planes and helicopters that have them. As before, it sometimes takes months to locate a missing plane in the Siberian taiga.

    We must realize that the GLONASS system will not be commissioned before 2010-2011, and that there would be no use for a smaller 18-satellite version.

    There are plans to orbit the first Uragan-K satellites, i.e. modified versions of the non-hermetically sealed Express-1000 space platform, in 2009-2010. Each Uragan-K satellite will have three channels, including one for civilian users, which will ensure its dependability and precision of navigation. The new satellite will weigh two times less than its predecessor, the Uragan-M.

    This means that the new medium-class Soyuz-2 rockets, rather than the expensive heavy-duty Proton vehicles, will be able to launch two Uragan-Ks at a time from the Plesetsk space center in the Arkhangelsk Region, in northern Russia. In all, there are plans to orbit 27 such satellites that will operate until 2025.

    A future, more advanced satellite navigation system will be made up of Uragan-KM spacecraft, whose specifications are currently being worked out. Flight tests will begin in 2015.

    Yury Zaitsev is an academic advisor at the Russian Academy of Engineering Sciences.

    http://www.idrw.org/2007/05/01/russias_glonass_satellite_navigation_system_runs_into_problems.html

    in reply to: Indian Missile news and speculations #1799046
    black eagle
    Participant

    Launch into the Ivy League
    Harsh V. Pant

    Earlier this month, India successfully test fired its nuclear capable Agni-III missile. The indigenously developed two-stage, solid propellant, 16 metre-long missile weighing 48 tonnes validated all the important flight parameters, thus fulfilling its mission objectives in its test. India thus joined a select group of nations to field missiles with the capability to hit targets at a distance of 3,500 kms with precision. Indian scientists have for the first time also ratified frontline technology of flex nozzle control system for rocket guidance, specially developed composite propellants, and guidance and control with fault tolerant avionics.

    With this launch, India demonstrated its persistence to develop and possess an Inter-Continental Ballistic Missile (ICBM) with a nuclear weapon-carrier capability. Agni’s range can be increased using PSLV simulations, thereby giving it an ICBM reach.

    India has hinted openly at its desire for pursuing its missile programme on the sidelines of its commercial space programme. As long back as 1979, Professor Satish Dhawan had declared that the SLV-3 could be converted into an Inter-mediate range Ballistic Missile (IRBM) with a range of approximately 1500 kms.

    It would be fair to assume at this juncture that India has enough technical expertise to develop an ICBM. Most of the technologies needed to develop an ICBM are not different from that required to launch a satellite into orbit. The key technologies that differ between an ICBM and a satellite launch vehicle are as follows:

    • A re-entry heat-shield capable of withstanding several thousand degrees centigrade — the recent test demonstrates the Indian capacity for the same

    • Sophisticated guidance and positioning system — India’s ability to position a satellite into the geo-synchronous orbit proves its ability for precision guidance and sensitive position-correcting instruments

    • A warhead instead of a satellite — India seems to possess this technology

    These developments show a steady growth in India’s missile programme. However, there are a few technical hurdles to overcome.

    India currently possesses two commercial launch vehicles, the PSLV with a solid rocket motor of 138 metric tonnes in its first stage and a liquid rocket engine of 37 tonnes as a second stage. The GSLV configuration is quite similar in its first stage with a solid rocket motor of 125 metric tonnes. Pursuing this option could be disadvantageous since both the motors mentioned above are too heavy for an ICBM. An Indian ICBM could, however, be also built using several liquid propellant engines. But this option is impractical in its approach since it would require a lot of time in getting liquid engines re-fuelled and subsequently not suited for quick military launches, if required.

    So far, India’s missile capabilities had not given it a second-strike capability vis-à-vis China. With a range of approximately 3,500 kms, Agni-III is capable of hitting most parts of the Asian continent and brings almost the whole of Pakistan and the Chinese cities of Shanghai and Beijing within striking distance. Though India has insisted that the missile testing wasn’t country specific and China-centric, India has achieved credibility in its nuclear deterrent posture vis-à-vis China with this test, something it has been striving for quite a while.

    One of the most powerful ballistic missiles that China has deployed is the liquid-propelled DF-5 which is being replaced by the all-solid DF-31. Though Agni-III is certainly more powerful than any missile in Pakistan’s inventory, the nuclear balance between India and Pakistan had been stabilised long back with both land and air-based capabilities. Pakistan possesses sufficient deterrent capability vis-à-vis India and has its eyes fixed on solid-propelled missiles, and its Ghaznavi is based on Chinese-supplied M-11 missiles.

    India’s technological prowess and its ambitions to emerge as a major power in the international system have been driving it toward the acquisition of ICBM capability for some time now. The reported success in the recent launch indicates that India may be swiftly filling in the technological gaps. However, this doesn’t necessarily reflect a political will, which is required for it to reach the ivy-league of missile capable states.

    http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/NEWS/newsrf.php?newsid=8608

Viewing 15 posts - 91 through 105 (of 233 total)