dark light

HuntingHawk

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 196 through 210 (of 315 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Indian navy – news & discussion #2061528
    HuntingHawk
    Participant

    Teej , Iam gonna post the entire report if you dont mind.

    Navy removes INS Trishul’s captain
    Josy Joseph
    Friday, February 24, 2006 14:04 IST

    NEW DELHI: The Indian Navy recently removed the captain of one of its latest and most modern warships, INS Trishul, for an accident involving the Russian made missile frigate and a merchant vessel on December 27 in the Mumbai waters. DNA had reported the freak accident in which Trishul banged into the merchant vessel Ambuja Lakshmi.

    Sources say that the captain of INS Trishul admitted to a professional error that possibly led to the accident. The action was taken after a board of inquiry submitted its report.

    The removal of the Trishul’s captain, a bright naval officer otherwise, came a few days ahead of Wednesday’s blast on board the INS Magar that has yet again kicked up fresh concerns regarding accidents in seas, especially involving naval ships that are carrying deadly weapon systems on board.

    Navy sources insist that a high premium on error free captainship of a ship is increasingly becoming important, as ships become platforms of deadly weapons and other complicated machines. “Tomorrow, we will also have nuclear weapons on board. So the importance of a ship’s captain can never be overstated,” says a seasoned naval hand.

    Wednesday’s blast aboard the INS Magar that killed three sailors yet again raises questions about the way the expired explosives were handled onboard.

    A navy officer said prima facie that the captain cannot be held responsible because Magar’s was a freak accident, but pointed out that a spark was all that was needed for the explosion to happen. One major possibility is that the explosive may have been dragged, leading to a spark. Such carelessness is unpardonable in the modern day naval ships, naval sources insist.

    A few years back, the Navy had also sacked the captain of a submarine that met with a freak accident off the coast of Goa. There again, it was an error of judgment by the captain that led to the submarine hitting another floating object while it was surfacing.

    In recent times, the most glaring case of an accident involving a naval warship happened off the coast of Mumbai, a couple of years back. INS Agray burst out when a misfired anti-submarine rocket was casually tossed overboard by sailors.

    The rocket exploded by the ship, injuring many sailors, flooding the engine room and damaging the ship beyond repair.

    http://dnaindia.com/report.asp?NewsID=1014636

    in reply to: Indian navy – news & discussion #2061636
    HuntingHawk
    Participant

    Apologies to 56 kbps’ers in Advance πŸ˜‰

    INS Trishul (Thanks to Narmad at BR for providing link)

    http://www.mil.ee/merevagi/pildid/pildid/album67/382_8201_IMG.sized.jpg

    http://www.mil.ee/merevagi/pildid/pildid/album67/381_8199_IMG.sized.jpg

    http://www.mil.ee/merevagi/pildid/pildid/album67/382_8204_IMG.sized.jpg

    More at : http://www.mil.ee/merevagi/pildid/view_album.php?set_albumName=album67&page=4

    in reply to: IAF News & Discussions #2584476
    HuntingHawk
    Participant

    OK ,this one…

    in reply to: IAF News & Discussions #2584480
    HuntingHawk
    Participant

    There was a superb picture of an MI26 lifting an MI17 in the Times of India (Pune edition) today. Unfortunately I cant find the picture online.

    in reply to: IAF News & Discussions #2587210
    HuntingHawk
    Participant

    Maybe the chase aircraft took off later ?

    in reply to: IAF News & Discussions #2587382
    HuntingHawk
    Participant

    I wonder which aircraft the Wng Cmdr was talking about as the chase plane ? Any Banglorite should be able to say which aircraft they see following the LCA often.

    in reply to: IAF News & Discussions #2587417
    HuntingHawk
    Participant

    I believe the chase ac is never M2K, more like jaguar or Mig21.

    I googled for LCA chase aircraft and it seems the chase aircraft is always the M2K πŸ™‚ (Unless Bangloreans say otherwise)
    (Remember, the LCA test flights were being delayed during Op Parakram because the AF could’nt spare M2K’s ? )

    If it is the M2k then it means it suffers from : “throttle handling at transonic / supersonic regimes and gross mismatch in performance” compared to the LCA according to the article by the Wng Cmdr.(The website seems to be down, the same pic was posted there along with the article)

    Anyone know what the exact meaning of “throttle handling” is ?

    in reply to: IAF News & Discussions #2587661
    HuntingHawk
    Participant

    Cool Pic !

    Tejas Flutter Testing by Wg Cdr Vikram Singh is also an interesting read .

    Quotes : “A climb to test altitude approx 11 Km Zp was made in 5:30 mins in dry power and 2:30 secs in reheat, with both consuming approx the same fuel but allowed the test ac to be closer or further from Bangalore city for subsonic or supersonic runs respectively.”

    “Another consideration was for the chase aircraft which suffered from restrictions in throttle handling at transonic / supersonic regimes and gross mismatch in performance.”

    // Wonder if the chase aircraft was the M2K ?

    One thing I noticed, the engines dont seem to be on afterburners (am I right ?).

    in reply to: Il-78 for NATO? An-72 for USAF? #2589118
    HuntingHawk
    Participant

    Well they ARE familiar with the layout

    http://www.stripes.com/photoday/091704.jpg

    Whats happening in the pic ? There seems to be water coming out of (into?)the engine . Are they testing ?

    in reply to: IAF News & Discussions #2590207
    HuntingHawk
    Participant

    “Dr” Karlo Kopp must have been frothing in the mouth πŸ˜€

    in reply to: Take a look inside the Brazilian Sub Tikuna! #2063991
    HuntingHawk
    Participant

    Thanks Hammer , great pics.

    in reply to: IAF News & Discussions #2596324
    HuntingHawk
    Participant

    http://www.zeenews.com/znnew/articles.asp?aid=273213&sid=NAT

    Agni III ready for launch, says DRDO
    New Delhi, Feb 03: India’s most ambitious surface-to-surface missile with intercontinental reach capabilities, Agni III, is ready for launch, the country’s top defence scientist M Natarajan announced today saying it was for political leadership to give the nod.

    “All technical parameters for the launch of the missile have been completed,” the Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO) Secretary told a press conference here.

    “We are ready for the launch today,” he said.

    Agni III is a 3,000-km plus range missile capable of carrying one tonne nuclear payload.

    Natarajan also said DRDO had made “tremendous progress” on the anti-missile shield for which India is currently in technology cooperation dialogue with the US, Russia and Israel.

    Refusing to divulge details, he said progress has been made on various components for the shield and the surface-to-air Akash missile was being configured for developing this indigenous system.

    For the first time, the DRDO Secretary came out with details about the various range of missiles being developed by the country in its integrated missile development programme, disclosing that the country’s first air-to-air beyond visual range (BVR) missile ‘Astra’ would be ready for test launch in two months.

    He said the government approval for the Astra programme had come a year ago and efforts were to develop BVR missile capable of engaging targets as far as 80 kms away.

    The top defence scientist also said that strides have been made in other major projects like development of indigenous weapon locating radar whose integration of components was going on and the system would be ready for field trial evaluation this year.

    “The system would have similar capabilities as that of ANTPQ-37 radars acquired from the US army under the foreign military sales programme. The DRDO radars would be, on many counts, far more advance than American radars which are of older version,” he said.

    On the missile devlopment programme, Natarajan said defence scientist were also working on the profile to develop 1,000 km range surface-to-surface supersonic cruise missile by enhancing capabilities of already deployed Indo-Russian BrahMos Missile.

    On the BrahMos missile, he said that the ship launched and surface-to-surface launched 300 km range missile was ready for deployment and was currently going through user trial with navy and army. He refused to comment on whether Indian and Russian scientists were developing a submarine launched version of the missile.

    On Agni missile, though DRDO had claimed that India was ready for the launch of the almost ICBM capable missile a year and a half back, no trials were undertaken apparently keeping in view the international opinion.

    To a barrage of queries on the repeated slippage and time over-runs on a number of key DRDO projects like main battle tank Arjun and Tejas Light Combat Aircraft programme, Natarajan, while admitting that these programmes were running far behind schedule, said that country’s defence scientist were working to check these factors.

    “The defence scientists are conscious that there have been time over-runs on some of the projects,” he said assuring that emphasis now was being laid on keeping time factor in all the programmes. However, he claimed that MBT Arjun even today was much more cost efficient than tanks of same calibre being produced elsewhere.

    Sidestepping questions on whether delay in the development of indigenous Kaveri fighter engine and any further slippage in induction of Tejas LCA might force the country’s defence planners to increase the number of proposed purchase of multi-role combat aircraft to more than 126, the DRDO Secretary assured that LCA programme was on schedule and that the first order of 20 LCA was awaiting cabinet approval.

    On the weapons integration on the LCA, the DRDO Secretary said this was part of the delivery agreement arrived at with Indian Airforce. “We plan to do weapons dummy trials by next year.”

    On the MBT Arjun Project, Natarajan said its induction was awaiting final army user and comparative trials. Though the government has cleared induction of 104 MBT Arjun, Army, which has some doubts, plans to undertake summer trials of the tanks pitting them against Russian acquired T-90 and T-72 main battle tanks.

    Asked about whether DRDO had found buyers for its tank ex, Natarajan said it was a technology demonstrator of integrating a weapon system on a T-72 chasis and it was upto the users like army to induct them if it finds them attractive.

    On the Bhim Project, mounting a 155 mm turret mountain gun, which was being undertaken with South African company Denel Cooperation, Natarajan said it had come stuck due to “political reasons”. “The country is looking for alternative sources and recently we have received offer from companies in Poland and Russia and we are evaluating these,” he said.

    Bureau Report

    in reply to: IAF News & Discussions #2597727
    HuntingHawk
    Participant

    I’m actually worried that the M2k5 was withdrawn. Wonder what the real reasons were ? The best case scenario would be that Dassault decided to give the Rafale their sole attention.

    in reply to: Indian Naval MiG-29K v/s Cinese Su-30MKK2 #2598636
    HuntingHawk
    Participant

    Unfortunately for you, your example of 920 engines(7 spare per one) did not support your argument as of now since it is not materialized yet (or maybe it will never happen). There is no any official announcement from HAL, IAF, or the Russian. You are just repeating some number from some fan sites to here.

    How is a link to the Article on the Russian Embassy site, written by the DG of the Confederation of Indian Industries , a ‘fan site’ ?
    The article appeared in the Financial Times on 29 July 2002. Or is that a ‘Fan Site’ too ?

    http://www.india.mid.ru/24_CII.doc

    in reply to: Take a look inside the Brazilian Sub Tikuna! #2064490
    HuntingHawk
    Participant

    Iam sorry, but are those pics still there ? All I see is a Mirage 3.

Viewing 15 posts - 196 through 210 (of 315 total)