dark light

Buran

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 166 through 180 (of 376 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Pakistan Air Force #2198757
    Buran
    Participant

    Well now the Chinese media too claim that the drone was one of Chinese make. And India has never and will never use Chinese drones.

    Oh what bull crap. Half of the things in the world including many in India are Chinese manufactured. You can go and buy the same drone in India from the following.

    http://avcsindia.com/
    http://phantomindia.com/

    in reply to: Pakistan Air Force #2198915
    Buran
    Participant

    ^

    ‘Pakistan shot down ‘made in China’ ‘spy’ drone belonging to its own police force’
    http://www.ibnlive.com/news/india/spy-drones-could-belong-to-pakistans-punjab-police-sources-1021010.html?utm_content=buffer0512b&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer

    Quiet hard to believe as police in neither India or Pakistan monitors the border areas, especially the disputed Line of Control. Also the range on theses kind of drones is not enough for it to have been flown in from a sufficiently long distance, this must be used by the forces protecting the border. Good idea to use a cheap commercial drone for deniability.

    in reply to: Greece aircraft Industry and the Grexit #2166127
    Buran
    Participant

    Given the need of the hour, would Greece ever think about selling some of their top assets (Block 52 and Erieye) to generate some cash flow for the armed forces?

    They can always rebuild in few years, if their economy is back on line.

    in reply to: Pakistan Air Force #2167630
    Buran
    Participant

    Awesome JF-17 War load…

    Are these C802s? Haven’t seen a pic with the Raad missile yet

    in reply to: Tejas or JF-17 for Sri Lanka? #2168361
    Buran
    Participant

    cheaper yet is to disband units altogether

    And completely loose a capability. It would cost a lot to rebuild from scratch than keep a minimum level

    in reply to: Tejas or JF-17 for Sri Lanka? #2168378
    Buran
    Participant

    Actually it is a combination of, it 30 years of war, curruption & mismanagement. Heavy increase in military expenditure from 2006 to 2009 was justified since there was a bloody war. But the former Secretary of Defense explained the defense budget could not be reduced much due most weapons bought on loan/credit. We are still paying for equipment bought many many years ago. So whats the point in buying 12 – 14 JF-17 on credit during peacetime?

    sometimes it is cheaper to get a new product in the long run than spend a lot of money on maintaining older models.

    in reply to: Tejas or JF-17 for Sri Lanka? #2169161
    Buran
    Participant

    Yeah right..the ACM and other IAF retired ACMs and AMs talk about somehow increasing production rates to quickly induct the Tejas Mk1 and a Pakistani comes up with this absurd analysis..

    But as Quantum FX put it, there isn’t any money for a fighter purchase as of now.

    As many people have told you previously, you don’t need to be that defensive all the times. Just having an opinion about LCA does not make anyone Pakistani.

    No doubt LCA will turnout to be a very good platform in the future versions, so one should have some confidence in what India is achieving and stop jumping around like a little girl every time there is a comment on LCA.

    in reply to: Tejas or JF-17 for Sri Lanka? #2169216
    Buran
    Participant

    They will go for JF-17 as it is available for export.

    Tejas will be available only after 2025 for export + Dependency on US for engines. Unless SL puts some spell on India and GoI divert the deliveries.

    IAF would be more than happy for someone to take the current batch off their hands. Maybe India can also do a very cheap deal for political reasons.

    Chinese fighters are already flying in India’s east, west and south (China itself in North)

    Not sure if internal politics in India will let HAL sell fighter jets to Sri Lanka though.

    in reply to: Pakistan Air Force #2170308
    Buran
    Participant

    Just out of interest, what capabilities does the LCA have over and above JF17 that classifies it as a 4th Gen fighter? I’m not talking about little gadgets here and there I would like to know if there are some significant technological differences that would really matter in a real life battle situation.

    To avoid ifs and buts, lets keep the comparison between JF-17 block 2 and FOC LCA MK1 (expected in Dec 2015)

    in reply to: How good is China's J8II Finback? #2173314
    Buran
    Participant

    That is a valid criticism. I assumed the chinese would have spares but that may not be true. Future upgrades – interchangeable with similar subsystems from say the J10/j31… Or various other programs.

    There seems no other plane of comparable performance and cost (assuming 10 million a piece)… Or is there?

    Unfortunately avionics and other sub-systems can not just be picked and dropped into any aircraft without some integration and testing. Who will foot the bill for this? its unlikely the OEM will. Than there are issues with reliability and maintenance of an older fighter.

    However it all comes down to the requirements of the customer. Do they need a dedicated interceptor with limited to no potential of upgrade and dwindling spares or invest in a newer multirole aircraft with potential of upgrade and newer weapon systems. An upgraded J8 might last them another 10 years but a new fighter will last 20+ years. So do the maths again.

    in reply to: How good is China's J8II Finback? #2173448
    Buran
    Participant

    Kinetic performance & range. Climb rate. A small air force could not afford tankers and other support assets. A J-8 could launch and intercept with decent range and very short times. Horses for courses my friend. Plus one could get a very sweet deal on refurbished Chinese J-8s…

    More of a reason for a smaller air force to go for a multirole fighter rather than an interceptor only. Who would invest in an aeroplane already out of production and being retired by the only user. Have you though about the issues with spares / future upgrades etc etc ?

    in reply to: Pakistan Air Force #2173924
    Buran
    Participant

    Does anybody know if the JF-17 will give an aerobatic disply or will they be on atatic display only?

    1 flying, 1 static display and 1 reserve

    Buran
    Participant

    PAF woukd love these for the current anti-Taliban operations, could probably get them via EDA and pay for upgrades via FMF.

    I doubt the intensity of the conflict in Pakistan warrants a dedicated CAS aircraft. They would be much better investing the time and funds into JF-17s or the armed Burraq UAVs. They are already purchasing a handful of MI-35s.

    in reply to: Pakistan Air Force #2189175
    Buran
    Participant

    I wonder if this is going to lead anywhere.

    http://www.aereo.jor.br/2015/05/04/tapete-vermelho-em-cordoba-fabricantes-de-caca-chines-vao-conhecer-a-fadea/

    Translation:

    It’s all prepared. During the week of 11 to 17 May, the Argentine authorities extend the red carpet to welcome the manufacturers of Sino-Pakistani lightweight fighter-bomber JF-17 (FC-1 in Pakistan), which arouses the interest of the Argentine Air Force (FAA ).

    Visitors will meet an extensive program of technical meetings, but also have some political nature of appointments.

    Upon arrival in Buenos Aires, the leaders of the Chinese export agency aeronautic equipment CATIC (China National Aero Technology Import & Export Corporation), the Chinese Chengdu Aircraft Industry Corporation (CAC) and the Pakistan Aeronautical Complex (PAC, its acronym in English), will travel to the city of Cordoba, where they will be greeted by the president of Airplane Factory Brig San Martín (FAdeA), Matías Savoca, the vice president of the company, engineer Franco Giuggioloni and the general manager of the company, Tulio Calderón.

    The direction of FAdeA hopes to participate in the production of JF-17 jets if the military aviation your country buy a larger batch of these devices (about 20 units), or the Chinese industry convinced the Air Force of Ecuador also acquire the model.

    In Cordoba, Chinese and Pakistanis know the jet production line subsonic Pampa II, the workshop where the EX-03 Pampa II registration has been modernized to the Pampa III version, the mounting area of ​​the freighter jet components Embraer KC-390 and the repair shop in attacking the twin-engine Pucara ground.

    FAdeA – part assembly of the KC-390
    Sign pointing the mounting area of ​​the KC-390 components

    Asians will also be taken to the city of Las Higueras, in the same province of Cordoba, to inspect the Area Material Río Cuarto, largest installation of logistical support from the FAA and military organization chosen by the corporation’s command to give maintenance in modern fighter aircraft that Argentines come to buy.

    Visitors will have other commitments away from the factory floor.

    In the Argentine capital they will be greeted by the head of the General Staff of FAA, brigadier, Mario Callejo, and the defense minister, Agustín Rossi. It is also possible that they be brought to a hearing protocol with President Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner.

    in reply to: Military Aviation News-2015 #2206267
    Buran
    Participant

    They do indeed assemble them locally.
    But that does not mean that they actually build them in Pakistan. The components could be shipped from China for assembly…..

    60% of JF17 is manufactured in Pakistan. The news relate to China supplying their share of components for the next 50 jets.

    http://www.ainonline.com/aviation-news/defense/2013-11-18/thunder-over-dubai-first-jf-17-batch-completed

Viewing 15 posts - 166 through 180 (of 376 total)