Selling older boats to Pakistan sounds like a good way for China to maintain SSK development, production and fleet modernisation. I had wondered what they were going to do about that eventually, given that they’re up to 40+ modern SSKs.
I wonder what boats China and Pakistan are looking at … late 035s or early 039s? The Kilos will probably have to be flogged off elsewhere when the time comes. I think they were trying to offload the 877 Kilos to Indonesia a couple years back.
I doubt they are negotiating for older boats given the price of 8-10 billion being mentioned. Also there is a reference to Yuan-class Type-041.
Its interesting to see this pic..so the Pakistanis are evaluating Z-10, T-129 and the Mi-35? Wasn’t the Mi-35 deal almost considered as being done?
And what is the Pakistani viewpoint on these 3 very different gunships?
I guess MI-35s will be for the eastern border (Afghanistan / Tribal areas) and Z-10/T-129 for western (India). MI-35s will also free up AH-1s and maybe provide some transport capability.
Burma to purchase JF-17
http://thediplomat.com/2014/06/burma-to-purchase-chinese-pakistani-jf-17-fighter-jets/
That story is from June 2014!
Block 2 JF-17 makes first flight ahead of Block 3 improvements
The first Block 2 JF-17 Thunder combat aircraft made its maiden flight from the Pakistan Aeronautical Company (PAC) facility at Kamra on 9 February.
The aircraft (serial number 2P01) made three more successful flights before being taken to the paint shop in mid-February. The test flights came as a boost as PAC continues to look for a first export customer for its platform.
Air Commodore Ahsan Rafiq, Deputy Chief Project Director (Operations) JF-17 and a former commanding officer of the JF-17 Test and Evaluation Unit, described the Block 2 version as “an upgraded Block 1 with an air-to-air refuelling (AAR) probe, enhanced oxygen system [to allow the pilot to stay in the air longer], and improved electronic countermeasures system (ECS)”.
http://www.janes.com/article/49991/block-2-jf-17-makes-first-flight-ahead-of-block-3-improvements
Are you sure they are Block IIs? The serial numbers would suggest late production Block I aircraft, although I think the JF-17 at the end of the line up in the second PIC appears to have a IFR probe with a cover on it?
That is a Mirage with IFR.
If certain stock market leeches had their way…
http://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/analysis-should-rolls-royce-stick-to-aero-engines-406714/
Yet another example of investment bank f__kwits being utterly incapable of understanding the complexities of the companies they “own”.
If I’d my way, anyone that buys shares in a company cannot divest those shares for a significant time period, say 5 years. It would end the destructive short-termism that is evident throughout the investment world and endemic at board-room level where instantaneous share price is king to the detriment of long term stability and growth.
Investors have different time horizons. You can not expect everyone to be locked in for 5 years if they only wanted to invest for a year. Put simply, would you deposit everything you have in your bank account knowing you cant withdraw for 5 years? You cant force people to buy something they dont want to, they will buy into other assets which they can sell off when ever they want.
And how can ypu know what the IAF and Indian intel knew? The IAF does not depend on the online enthusiast community from Pak def fora to judge what PAF can or cannot do. They have access to both internal and external domain experts plus the usual espionage, arms vendors info etc etc.
.
Sorry didn’t get you. I think intelligence agencies would include Indian intelligence as well! Exactly my point, perhaps only the Indian intelligence might have known everything but even than things can be missed (Kargil, Mumbai etc being some of the examples) No one can claim to be all knowing.
It has been a surprise to the online Pakistani defence enthusiast community no doubt, but the Indian Air Force, not so much. India built up its capabilities keeping these in mind.
These were a complete surprise for everyone except perhaps the people in intelligence community.
If Pakistanis are able to integrate their air launched cruise missile on JF-17 (I understand range over 350km) along with Chinese CM-400 missiles that will give them a standoff capability to attack targets deep inside India so the question of whether they are as good as Indian fighter jets is maybe not as important.
On a strategic level what India needs to understand is just like in the climax of action movies, when you are about to face the big villain (China in India’s case) even a single stab in the back from their henchmen can prove to be very costly.
Well, it’s not like anyone believes that the PAF could ever deal a decisive blow to the IAF. But the question is will it be able to prevent the IAF from having an overwhelming advantage in any future war scenario. The IAF may incur serious losses but would the PAF be left as a fighting force? Agreed that today the PAF isn’t quite as weak as it was during the Kargil War, but what about 2025? the IAF in 2025 will look quite a bit different from what it does today, so what are the realistic options to stay at par technologically at least, if not numerically (which will be impossible).
Asymmetric warfare using “non-state” actors is a tactic that Pakistan will never stop using. But that has nothing to do with the situation in the air. The PAF is banking very heavily on the JF-17 but just how good will it be against the FGFA, Super-30, Rafale or Su-30MKI leave alone the Mirage-2000-5, MiG-29UPG, Tejas Mk2 or a MiG-29K? In sheer numbers alone, the Super-30 and Su-30MKI fleet will be larger than the entire JF-17 fleet.
Banking on the F-16 to provide the cutting edge out to 2030 seems like a proposition fraught with risk. If the relationship with the US deteriorates and spares and weapons supplies stop, then what happens to the PAF?
2030? Hand on heart had a Pakistani had told me 15 years ago that they will have the following, I would have laughed at their face.
– 4 Air to air refulers
– 5+ AWACS from 2 countries
– 70+ F-16s including Block 52s
– Air launched cruise missiles
– Ground Launched cruise missiles
– 500+ BVR missiles
– 100 New Anti radiation missiles
– Tactical nuclear weapons (Nasr? etc)
Each and every purchase above has been a surprise. And if Indians are only preparing based on the assumptions in the last few posts, than god help them.
At the risk of inflaming this Pakistan/India high school cat fight……
I think we are comparing apples with oranges. Pakistan in my opinion does not want to overtake India in military capability, they just need enough to inflict losses to India in any war to unacceptable levels. Neither can give the opponent a decisive blow without being seriously wounded itself.
We already know that both countries use the best methods at their disposals to give a response to each other (Mumbai, Parliament attacks etc) and that can not be stopped, ever. Even US has not been able to block the Mexican border with all the gadgetry at its disposal.
I think JF-17 is the best solution for Pakistan given the situation.
10 years is a very long time in this part of the world. Who knew 10 years ago that India would be flying P8is and Pakistan would get new Block 52+
Most of Pakistan’s acquisitions have been out of the blue (Block 52, Mar 1, Erieye to name a few) unlike the very public drawn out processes in India so anything can happen.
There are claims that TTP shot a F-16. is it true?
Ya. Taliban shooting down a block 52+!
All they have is a jettisoned external fuel tank and a TER-9 (Triple ejector rack) with a dumb bomb attached.
AFAIK most AMRAAM’s for east Asian customers are stored in Guam. Would be interesting to know where the weapons for mid eastern countries are stored.
So why buy AMRAAM? It’s like paying for a car but leaving it at the delaers!
Wouldnt it make sense to buy what you can really use? or is it like a joint pool where you have a set upper limit and pay for what you actually use?
It’s an legitimate question that i would want to know myself, and for the same reason
I thought that was clear enough.
If you rape, behead and torture while fighting someone US doesnt agree with than you are a freedom fighter/ legitimate resistance
If you attack US or its allies than you are a terrorist and can be eliminated via a drone strike. Funny until Assad was on the receiving end of ISIS, western govts were falling over each other to help out the anti Assad insurgents and suddenly they are the enemy now.
It would be a lot easier if all insurgents across the globe registered with the US govt and got a terrorism waiver on a monthly basis. Dept of Terrorist affairs 🙂
Let’s put it simply. A UAE pilot cannot plan his mission without US officers in the loop, and even can’t jump into a F-16 without US approval (birds are guarded by US MP…) Many AMRAAM bought by foreign countires are stockpiled in the US.
I wouldnt even take that with a pinch of salt.
I doubt there is a secret formula to plan a mission which only US pilots know and have not been shared with UAE. UAE has good relations with a lot of countries which operate F-16s.
These are just F-16s not B-2 stealth bombers on loan to UAE!! And no one would buy AMRAAM if they will only be sent via Fedex 2 days after a war started