dark light

Buran

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 316 through 330 (of 376 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Air War over Iran – Part 2 #2331841
    Buran
    Participant

    Really? North Korea is supposed to be a nuclear country- what, the US smuggled a bomb into the north and detonated it and forced the north to say it was them?

    The ’12 minute articule’ I read quoted an Iranian general, so I agree it is far from reliable:rolleyes:

    PPP- with precision guided munitions, I would have thought 10 per target, but possibly 25 in total, 10 for a lesser site and 15 for Natanz.

    Buran- Iran wont make the mistake of interferring to much in Iraq and A-stan again. enough important people in congress would push for massive retaliation.

    So the US strategy would be a ‘hope’ that Iran doesn’t retaliate? It didn’t work for them in North Korea and won’t work in Iran either.

    Attacking Iran won’t be a one or two raid job, US better be prepared to fight it out in Iraq and Afghanistan.

    in reply to: Air War over Iran – Part 2 #2332090
    Buran
    Participant

    I think if there is a stirke at Iran, the US soldiers in Iraq and Afghanistan can forget about looking out for ‘home made’ IEDs because they will have proper ATGMs heading their way.

    Iran can casue a real problem in Afghanistan and Iraq. Forget about their differences with the Taleban, they got weapons delivered by Israel during the Iran-Iraq war.

    in reply to: Air War over Iran – Part 2 #2332869
    Buran
    Participant

    No, it came across as if you personally called an iranian embassy and warned them. that was what i found odd.

    Buran, if Iran did that again, it would provide even more reason for the US to explain ‘operation iranian freedom’

    And the regime is unpopular, and I’m sure the catastophic mistakes of Iraq wont be repeated.

    = more oil, more safety in the gulf etc etc

    If US could pull off operation Iranian freedom they would have done so. Reasons are ten a penny, when they need one they will pull it out of a hat, just like Iraq.

    Right now they don’t have the resources for a ground invasion, give the other two adventures are going so well and North Korea is flexing its muscles.

    in reply to: Air War over Iran – Part 2 #2332975
    Buran
    Participant

    You think Iran isn’t already involved in both. The Brits had hard evidence of Iranian cross border involvement several years ago in Iraq.

    No one is claiming that Iran hasn’t got its hand in both these countries at the moment.

    They want Americans to win both in Iraq and Afghanistan, lets be honest both wars served Iranian interests too. But they want US to get a good licking before they win. There is no full and explicit support for these groups.

    There might be some low level support but if they ratchet it up to the level of support US gave mujahideen, things will get dirty.

    Anyways the point of my previous post was to say that air power is not enough to take care of the dispersed Iranian nuclear programme, if it could have worked we would have seen a series of massive air raids on Iraq not a ground invasion!

    in reply to: Air War over Iran – Part 2 #2333121
    Buran
    Participant

    Even after 10 years of the UN inspectors roaming around Iraq and frequent air raids by US, all the Westerns ‘Intelligence’ agencies put together couldn’t work out if Iraq had Nuclear weapons or not. What’s to say that Israel and America know of and will hit all the Iranian nuclear sites? I am sure Iranians have enough redundancy in their nuclear programme to survive an attack or two by US and their side kick.

    With thousands of US troops in Afghanistan and Iraq, all Iran will have to do to get back at US would be to fully start backing up the insurgents in both countries. If things are bad now, just imagine what it could turn into.

    in reply to: Indian Space/Missile News/Discussion – III #1799979
    Buran
    Participant

    No nation has the capability to build Ballistic missiles without failures as we saw with the United States and Russia, but for a nation to be in the top ten ranks of failed nations like Pakistan and still have a missile program with no failures must be incredible

    RAAD ALCM‘ and ‘Babur Cruise missile‘? Wait, let me guess, no failures either?
    With the level of technological advance that the Pakistanis have what is it doing in the rank of top ten Failed states?

    IMHO, India should be on top of that list with the number of missile failures. Can someone edit that Wikipedia entry please?

    I think you are confusing the failed states list with missile test failures. Let me assure you these things are completely irrelevant. Even Russia was in the failed states list in 90’s with its mighty missile forces.

    in reply to: Defections Of Pilots W/ Aircraft #2354509
    Buran
    Participant

    In addition to Afghan Migs 21s and AN 26 which are in the PAF museum, there was an AN 12 which is also in the Museum as well as a few MI 24 Hinds and MI-8s. During the Afghan war one Hind was given to the US and maybe one went to China. Pakistan Army Aviation also used a couple operationally for a while. One airframe was last seen abondoned in Karachi and others are in Quetta.

    Hind at Karachi

    [ATTACH]190620[/ATTACH]

    in reply to: Military Aviation News from around the world – V #2377681
    Buran
    Participant

    Would be a nice strike force to pulverize an Iranian nuclear facility. How much would it cost to pack them up and ship them to Israel?

    The problem is its ‘facilities’ not one facility in Iran, you will need more than a few air raids to dent their capability.

    in reply to: Pakistan Air Force III #2379130
    Buran
    Participant

    Thats how you close the canopy!

    and few more shots.

    in reply to: Lufthansa MD-11F Crashes in Riyadh #536976
    Buran
    Participant

    http://images.alarabiya.net/large_27753_114965.jpg

    Crashed plane at Riyadh

    in reply to: Pakistan Air Force III #2380973
    Buran
    Participant

    I will leave the question of whether an aircraft that did not take part in the flying display could claim to be the star of the show to braver (or more argumentative) souls. But to judge by the commotion in the beer tent queue on Monday lunchtime, the arrival of the Vulcan might have been the high point of that day.

    All I can say to that is the PAF C-130 at RIAT few years ago didnt fly, it even had the wrong spelling on the fuselage! still it was awarded a nmber of trophies and was considered to be a star attraction.

    in reply to: Pakistan Air Force III #2381200
    Buran
    Participant

    I can’t speak for the public days, but there were no “swarms” when I went to see it last Monday and Wednesday. Only about half a dozen onlookers on both occasions. The two aircraft were parked sufficently far from the rest of the static display to discourage many visitors, I suspect.

    I was there on Saturday, and it really was swarmed with people. Every one was asking the pilots ”where is this plane from?” ”Is it swedish?”. To say the least most people were really impressed not only with the planes but also with the Pakistani pilots who were very well spoken.

    Im sure Pakistanis visiting their display at Farnborough were very proud.

    Buran
    Participant

    Only a matter of time till Pakistan was dragged into this by posters of a certain nationality.

    Yup, that train is never late….

    Yeah, lets forget all about the main subject (Israel striking Iran) and lay some crap on Pakistan.

    Wow calm down, I was only making a very valid point regarding the US foreign policy. Like it or not US-Pak relationship is like a yoyo.

    Apart from this, we are trying to have a mature conversation here. If you start throwing bigoted remarks regarding the nationality of the posters at any post you don’t like, its not going to add anything to the discussion except the usual flaming.

    Buran
    Participant

    1) Wrong on this count, UN now suspect Iran may be developing weapons
    2) Saudia issues more Fatwas then Iran? That is the basis of Iran being more tolerant? VERY flawed argument here….
    3)I dont want to get into whose laws are more repressive, I dont really care, but will settle for the fact people still get whipped and ordered to be stoned to death in Iran. As this also happens in SA, does not make Iran more better
    4) Does not matter who they were fighting, why bring in other wars. My point is they attacked innocent shipping. Not the sign of a stable power.

    Of course SA gets let off the hook by the Yanks. No dount about that. It does not make Iran a nice guy.

    Iran is one of the most dicatorial states in the world. Arguing otherwise seems insane.

    The world is full of countries who dont conform with the western ideal of a free democracy.

    We can point out a country far worse than Iran on every issue you have mentioned above, but invading those countries is not in the strategic interest of US.

    When they have to hammer a country to submission they cherry pick the criteria and arguments to suit their needs.

    We have seen this yo-yo in the past;

    Iraq good – Iraq bad
    Taliban Good – Taliban bad
    Iran good – Iran bad
    Pakistan good – Pakistan bad -Pakistan good again!

    in reply to: Military Aviation News from around the world – V #2381756
    Buran
    Participant

    Yeah, much better for all if Hamas, er “Iran” has nukes. :rolleyes:

    I couldnt care less if they did. All it will do is stop west doing an Iraq on more countries.

Viewing 15 posts - 316 through 330 (of 376 total)