dark light

briantk

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 14 posts - 1 through 14 (of 14 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Spanish and other navies Never where ships #2094016
    briantk
    Participant

    What concerns me in that Korean ships, is that IMO they back too much on too small, and thats never recepy for succses. Also, Before that biggest SK build surface ships had been the Ulsan class ligth frigates, so It would have been risky deal to purchase ships before Korean Own navy had any experience wheter their shipyards could come up with succsefull ships.
    Ofcourse, the KDX program seems to go on fine, so that migth have been death concern. Also, I agree Lafayettes AD is almoust useless compared to what the Korean ship would have offered. As it came known, the French deal was hampered by mainland opposition, but would that have inflicted to SK ones? Expecially, when the armament fit would have been from US? Im not that big expert on China-Korean relations, but that sure is intresting side note on the Taiwan’s proplematic naval accustion history.

    Well, I believe by the time Korea offered the ships to Taiwan, they learn to overcome many problems they faced when building Ulsan class warships. Also, civil shipbuilding was booming at time, building supertankers for Korean and foreign customers. So technical improvement in civil can be transferred to military with little or no difficulty. Plus before late nineties, naval projects for foreign customers was the biggest arm industry in Korea at the time.

    And as for the relations with PRC, there was none. This happened before diplomatic relations was first established between RoK and PRC. Of course, Korea diplomats may influence the sale in regard to possible PRC relations, that is something to speculate.

    PS: Don’t you think the Ulsan derivative look like smaller version of US Spruance class?
    Also, can anyone has better pictures of those models?

    in reply to: Spanish and other navies Never where ships #2094052
    briantk
    Participant

    yeah I recall that pribe thing, but It didn’t came to my mind that it was related to these projects.

    So do you think, Taiwan would have been better off by getting Korean ships instead of French?
    Aside from bribe, cost and poor AD, Lafayette is good ships. But then stealth is poor trade-off in my opinion and Taiwan should have purchased Ulsan derivative. I mean it offered better AD than current Taiwanese Lafayette, plus 16 vs. 6.

    in reply to: Spanish and other navies Never where ships #2094110
    briantk
    Participant

    You think so? It hardly resembles it. If someone has any additional info, please don´t hold yourself back:-))

    I remember reading it from Jane’s book about that.
    South Korea offered 16 to Taiwan who needed coastal defense warships like Ulsan derivative.
    But French gave big bribe, so Taiwan purchased 6 Lafayette.
    I don’t know if this will help, but if you browse Jane’s Navy book from late 80s to early 90s, it mentions in Taiwan category.

    Articles about the scandal.
    http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/library/news/taiwan/2006/taiwan-060724-cna02.htm
    http://209.85.173.104/search?q=cache:BZY7pWwY7j0J:english.www.gov.tw/TaiwanHeadlines/index.jsp%3Fprint%3D1%26categid%3D8%26recordid%3D97407+taiwan+korea+ulsan+warship&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=5&gl=us
    http://209.85.173.104/search?q=cache:zGal1h-pyo0J:english.www.gov.tw/TaiwanHeadlines/index.jsp%3Fcategid%3D8%26recordid%3D88979+taiwan+korea+ulsan+warship&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=6&gl=us

    in reply to: south Korea new ATGM. #1808287
    briantk
    Participant

    No additional info, but have a photo of the model.

    in reply to: your country armed forces your way #2600191
    briantk
    Participant

    RoKAF alternate history thread*

    1960:**
    12 F-86 squadrons
    6 A-1 squadrons

    1966:
    12 F-86 squadrons
    6 F-5 squadrons
    9 A-1 squadrons(3 stationed in Vietnam)

    1976:
    12 F-5 squadrons
    6 F-4 squadrons
    6 A-1 Skyraiders
    3 A-37 squadrons

    1986:
    12 F-5 squadrons
    6 F-4 squadrons
    6 A-10 squadrons
    3 Tornado IDS squadrons

    1996:
    12 Northrop F/A-18L squadrons***
    6 F-4 squadrons
    6 A-10 squadrons
    3 Tornado IDS squadrons

    * In my alternate history scenario, someone beside Syngman Rhee becomes president of RoK, US leaves enough artillery assets to equip nine divisions for RoK in 1948, fighting gets stalemated just north of Seoul(no Pusan Perimeter), amphibious assault on Nampo, no separate commands between Eighth Army and X Corps during drive north, UN forces stop before Chongchon river to consolidate their line, MacArthur does not panic when PLA first attack, fighting eventually stabilize around 50 km north of Pyongyang and when ceasefire declared, PRC has buffer zone between Chongchon river and Yalu.

    ** Concentrating only on combat aircraft complement.

    ***Or equivalent version by McDonnell Douglas

    in reply to: South Korea – ROKAF. Photo Achieve #2612876
    briantk
    Participant

    Does anyone have pic of F-4 flying over Russian sub?
    I remember seeing it on Korean newspapers long time ago.

    in reply to: South Korean Air Force Updates Emblem #2623271
    briantk
    Participant

    Here’s the pic of the emblem

    in reply to: Korea's next generation fighter #2624337
    briantk
    Participant

    As I said it is an early concept.
    No hard data yet.

    in reply to: Korea's next generation fighter #2624773
    briantk
    Participant

    is it real? it looks incredibly small. the forward fueselage and canopy is not proportional to the rest of the aircraft, it’d be amazing if they can actually fit sufficient air intakes let alone an internal weapons bay.

    Just early design concept, actual aircraft will probably be very different.

    in reply to: KAI to export 60 trainer jets to UAE #2635712
    briantk
    Participant

    Speaking of which, what other planes were sold to foreign countries before domestic AF recieved it?

    in reply to: What are the Naval implications of S.Korea's Flying Boats #2061246
    briantk
    Participant

    Russia did experimented with in the sixties.
    They hope to built it as troop transport.
    Never put into production.

    For Korea’s attempt, I see only as civilian use, perhaps until technology matures and military see a potential.

    Go here http://www.kordi.re.kr/ for Korea Ocean Research and Development Institute website.
    And.
    http://www.se-technology.com/wig/index.php

    in reply to: KMSAM #2050647
    briantk
    Participant

    Euro,Russia,US SAM system? Super complicated!!! :confused:

    I should have said that rumored source of technical aid came first from Russia and now EUROSAM.

    in reply to: Little known Asian Aircraft! #2634566
    briantk
    Participant

    Back to Jap F-2, a month ago, I have read a local news paper in America, that they are going to cancel the production because some proplem with it (related to its composite airframe). Instead, they are going to buy JSF.

    I don’t know how reliable.

    I too have heard that only 60 will be procured.
    Shame.
    So much invested, so little gained.

    in reply to: Potential for the A-50/F-50 Golden Eagle? #2623419
    briantk
    Participant

    So here’s what I know so far.
    I know Israel expressed interest on A-50.
    Lockheed Martin displayed A-50 model to UAE, try to sell it to UAE saying it complement well with their latest acquisition of F-16.
    Vietnam had also express interest in A-50 as well.
    SEA may be a potential market.
    Aside from Hawk, A-50 is the only next generation of LIFT are ahead in development compared to others. MAKO I believe is still in blueprint stage, Aemarchi is in mock up stage, and MIG-AT have just had first flight test.

    I have seen pic of souped up version of A-50 in a model format. It has AMRAAM on the rail, with Sidewinders and cluster munitions, IRST and the caption said that pilot will have HMD. Tried to find the pic but no luck.

    PS: Until recently, I thought China was preoccupied with big projects like J-10 and neglected F-7 project. So I though SK has potential to sell F-50 to Pakistan. Since Pakistan is in favour with US, SK wouldn’t have any difficulty merchandising to Pakistan. Then China accelated JF-17 program and Pakistan are now fully committed to it. RATS!!

Viewing 14 posts - 1 through 14 (of 14 total)