Watch this apart from the lady at the start and the guy with the ear peice in ,it will make you cring 😮

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/7401713.stm

Paul

The music is fantastic ,but a strange ad for choc,mind you no stranger than the last one 😀

Uninformed and unsupported speculation that casts doubt upon the integrity and professional ability of flightcrew involved in an incident is inappropriate and unhelpful, and is not welcome here.

All the more so when it comes in the form of the first ever posting by an apparently new user.

Paul – I deleted your posting because it didn’t make a lot of sense after I’d deleted the posting that you quoted, mate.

GA

No worries mate,should realised you would pull it

Paul

well whats the point of having replacement singer if its only purpose is to sound as close to the orginal?? I mean, that is like trying to fool people to think Freddy still lives. If the rest of Queen want to go on, best way is to renew themselves, and get singer who can stand by his own and bring something new to the sound….and for that Paul Roger is best they could get.

George Michael…….:D 😀 😀 For me, Queen has always been rock band…George Michael:eek: 😮

Fair point,It might make a differance that Queen and Paul Rodger’s are writting new stuff so they can make it there own,then yes I have to agree maybe Paul Rodger’s is the best to do it,BUT the last tour was 95% old Queen stuff and Paul Rodger’s does not do it justice if fact I found some of it painfull to listen too.
But that is just my views.

Paul

What ??? You’d rarther have the lead singer from a naff 80’s pop band replacing Freddie, ahead of the singer in not just one but two classic 70’s rock bands !

George Michael wouldn’t know what to do in Queen, I mean how would he cope standing next to a guitar that’s really being played for starters ? 😉 😀

I have to say YES I think his voice is better suited to Queen more than Paul Rodger’s

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8c7x2JD_j-0

this is almost has good as Freddie could do and much better than any I have heard Paul Rodger’s do with Queen stuff.
Like I have already said Paul Rogers is a talented singer and songwriter but not in Freddie’s class to be honest not even George Micheal is fit to walk in Freddie’s boots,BUT I think is better suited to singing Queen
Paul

Queen without Freddie! Those guys should move on, Paul Rodgers does not light my fire. At least John Deacon new when to call it a day.

I have to agree ,even thought Paul Rodger’s is a talented singer in his own right,IMHO he is not worthy of laceing Freddie’s boots let alown fronting his band.
The only one that could poss replace him is George Micheal ,but thats not going to happen.
I ried to get tickets for the last tour but never did,I obtained the album and I was less them impressed Rodger’s voice is now way near has big as Freddie’s.
Has a fan I would like Queen to carry on and make new stuff,but not like this they are NOT Queen and never will be again,time to call it a day i think

Paul

So true, can’t to this day understand why that was not a massive album! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=asZ5xB3K3VE

I know a few Queen fans who hate the album with a passion,not worthy of even being mention in the same breath has Queen.But when I ask them why they cant tell me a reason.
I must admit thats when I first heard it ,it was a strange album for Queen to do and not the normal stuff for them.
But for me it shows a cleaver side to Queen,the way they did a offbeat album and basicly said sod off to the ones that did not like it,for e thats what makes it one of the top 5 maybe even top 3 Queen albums

Paul