Too much information Bunsen – any more and we’ll be in trouble with the Internal Drainage Board!
Still struggling to find you mistyar – but 10 out of 10 for taking part!!
Many thanks for that Rich, all feedback will be gratefully received – were the photocopies from the radio AP of any use?
Thank you for the heads-up – details have been forwarded over to the museum curator! 🙂
Middle Wallop has the 3rd pre-production SA.341G Gazelle F-ZWRI (XW276) out on loan at Newark – not sure whether that counts as a prototype (3rd prototype etc.??) :confused:
Are you in a position to elaborate? Is it being rumoured that LCC could take the view that its historic aeroplanes do now warrant inclusion in its future museum retention and display policy? Should we be scanning the catalogue of Sotheby’s next aeronautica auction?
Being part of the team that had secured the Desford on loan to Newark Air Museum to accompany the Autocrat, I always try to keep an eye on ‘missed opportunities’.
This loan opportunity was back in the 1990s and such was the certainty of its arrival I even included the airframe in an edition of the NAM guide book!
Sadly the loan then became embroiled in the ‘politics’ of ‘Unitary Authorities’ and it never made it to Winthorpe. The last serious discussions I had about it about 7 years ago seemed to indicate the title issue between the authorities was still unresolved.
I saw the BBC piece and have been doing a bit of ‘background research’ – it would be great news if its future were to be secured somewhere in Leicestershire. What caught my eye in the BBC article was the comment – “The new offering on Snibston I’m hoping will be better and more focussed on the mining heritage.”
As for auction houses, if it were to become available I would like to think that it would be offered to other museum’s first as with the IWM airframes!
Other than those observations – I know nothing!!! 🙂
Over the last few days there’s been a fresh flurry of bookings for the March Indoor Aeroboot / Aerojumble sale, which now means that over half of the spaces have been allocated – more details in here!
Some flyers are also available and if anyone would like some to give out / distribute, then please send me a PM or email me a postal address.
Sorry about that, I wasn’t aware of your participation – I’ve been through the clips again but I cannot see you!
I was taken on an ‘interesting’ lap at Blyton, Lincs yesterday – including a ‘photo-stop’ on the main straight!! 😮
I was taken on an ‘interesting’ lap at Blyton, Lincs yesterday – including a ‘photo-stop’ on the main straight!! 😮
This possible ‘change of direction’ is being monitored by some in respect of aviation in Leicestershire http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-leicestershire-25587645
This cricket match seems to be getting a bit serious – perhaps we’ll have to ask NAM’s groundsman to prepare a pitch. :eagerness:
No roller I’m afraid, perhaps they could tow the soon to be mobile Aston up and down a few times!! 🙂
As no one has ‘bitten’ yet on the RAFBF fund raiser in the video clip – I suspect that the cricket would be a much safer option!
I personally feel that the yoke / grip display is a great idea and I would be all for that; I’ll run the idea past Mr O’S et al – who knows we might be able to persuade NAM to delve into its ‘back collection’ for the weekend i.e. items waiting for display when more appropriate facilities are available!
We aim to please!!
On that note I’m hearing whispers that the organisers might be considering the introduction of a fresh compulsory participation aspect to this year’s event as seen in this video clip – so I just wanted to ‘test the water’ a bit on here!
It’s anticipated that the only exemptions would be by presenting a doctor’s certificate, or a note from your mum! 😉
Any takers?
A pragmatic approach and in part already covered by the NAHR and the Accreditation process – sadly that wasn’t a view held by a former curator of the Science Museum, with whom I crossed swords on many occasions when the very same topic was being publicly debated at meetings I attended including Ironbridge; Hendon, Duxford to name but a few!
…The wider debate should be one of ‘What should be in the National collection, and where and how should they be displayed?’
That’s an interesting thought; while I haven’t got my notes to hand, IIRC that’s where the debate started that eventually resulted in the National Aviation Heritage Register – what would be done about the National Benchmark airframes in independent collections??? :confused: