Nobody who makes any attempt to understand Indian strategic interests and priorities could fail to appreciate the significance of MMRCA and the eminent suitability of Rafale for the contract, and the corresponding unsuitability of MiG-35 or F-35.
http://age.lenta.ru/maks_2013/video/2013/09/01/su30/
Su-30SM + HD + full screen = nice.
Excellent footage + the source of those great Su-30 pics a little ways back.
Here is Youtube link for those who prefer it.
India already has the Su-30MKI, no need to complicate things. The Super 30 upgrade will borrow much from the Su-35 program.
MMRCA is for a smaller bird, so it is a separate deal altogether.
+1
But now that the subject is raised, is ‘Super 30’ going to incorporate the kinds of airframe refinements (aerodynamics, materials, wet pylons, etc.) found in Su-35, or is it more a collection of systems upgrades? Have they decided on engine + radar yet?
I don’t think that will ever happen, especially due to certain countries having closer affiliations to each other than others – US, UK, France, Germany and Japan are all part of the same bloc in most instances.
Germany is not part of the US/UK/FR interventionist bloc.
Some recent (2013) An-70 pics:
http://russianplanes.net/id108958
http://russianplanes.net/id118126
http://russianplanes.net/id103823
Don’t forget that the burqa is not mandated by the Koran or any credible hadith, there is no historical evidence that it was part of early Islam (it seems to have been a pre-Islamic Persian custom) [….] It’s no more part of Islam than beards or female genital mutilation. It’s a custom which some religious extremists have chosen as a marker.
My argument against banning the burqa/niqab/etc. does not rest upon religion as a category enjoying unique protection or consideration (although it is difficult to miss the fact that xenophobia is certainly what inspired the French bill) but rather upon the more basic principle that citizens should be free to dress (or not) as they wish, surely one of the most basic manifestations of the individual liberty western nations claim to hold dear.
In fact the Turks are begging for NATO/US intervention.
Are they? Serious question — I’ve read about Turkish government attitudes re: Syria, but what of the average Turkish citizen? The Syrian Kurds are fighting the Sunni Islamists as much or more than they are the Alawites so I think we can assume the average Turkish Kurd is at best ambivalent about the prospect of US intervention, but what about the rest of the country?
Sounds like the sort of thing which has been going on between Greece and Turkey for decades, only this time with the novelty of British aircraft. Overly sensationalist I think, like the news reports which occasionally crop up about Russian bombers violating British air space before being intercepted by ‘our intrepid RAF chaps’.
I think that if the likes of Erdogan stays in power, Turkey will continue to shift from Europe and NATO.
If Turkey retains its democratic credentials and NATO continues to wage war on Muslims and the US its support for the Israeli occupation of Palestine, the continuing drift of Turkey from the west is inevitable. But in the past and present Erdogan has been a firm advocate of Turkey’s accession to the EU.
My words. In all fairness, if secular women are forced to give up their practices like wearing high heels and mini-skirt on a public road in Riyadh, then muslim women should be forced to give up their practices and remove their niqabs, chadors and burkhas in the streets of London or Paris without bickering.
Fair is fair..
Sure — if you’re happy with London or Paris being compared to Riyadh.
The recent French ban on the wearing of the burqa indeed reflects the imposition of the values of the dominant cultural group upon the minority, which is of course one of the major problems westerners tend to have with theocratic systems of governance. The example of France — an ostensibly secular society — demonstrates that the issue in question is not one of religious governance vs. secularism, but rather the more fundamental question of the rights of the individual vs. those of society.
If they don’t like our lack of sharia law, our love of beer and wine or that parking metre girls in the Gold Coast wear bikinis, then they can always move somewhere there is sharia, parking metre attendants are old men and you can’t get a good bottle of Sauvignon Blanc to save yourself.
And yet in Australia you will be arrested for going about naked, and we do restrict the availability and consumption of certain other substances for reasons similar to Muslim concerns about alcohol. These features of Australian society are not derived from respect for abstract principles such as ‘freedom of expression’ (p.s. I thought you were opposed to idealism?) but rather reflect the equilibrium values of the dominant cultural group in 2013; they are features which can, in principle, be altered at will. If the demographic make-up of Australian society were to change sufficiently so as to enable the dress and consumption practices favoured by orthodox Muslims to prevail at the ballot box, the changes thus wrought would be no different — that is to say, a requirement to wear e.g. conservative clothing is fundamentally no more objectionable than the requirement we currently do have to wear clothing at all. Of course, it is no less objectionable either: those who argue that folk should be allowed to go around naked and consume narcotics at will, etc. need not trouble themselves with this point.
They have made a lot of effort to obtain the Su-33s, one way or another.. Mainly because their own experience with designing carrierborne fighters is next to zero.
Which is why going after the T-10K prototype was a very good idea. It is a mistake to confuse prudence with an inability to undertake original development.
Brazil, Mexico summon US envoys over spy claims
Not strictly aviation news related, but interesting because of how Brazil/Mexico decided to raise the stakes… Now Brazil has the option of negotiating hard for a deal with the US in time for the Olympics.
I don’t think that’s why they’re making a fuss about it.
The fact that they had to buy the T10K prototype from Ukraine to come to the J-15, at all, says a lot.
Just because China obtained T-10K doesn’t mean they couldn’t have made J-15 without it. It would be arrogant and foolish of the Chinese to think that they had little to learn from Russia’s experience, why pass up the opportunity?
The most entertaining way to proceed would be to have the Japanese build 3-4 boats and we build the other 4-5 locally. Then whenever there’s a problem it can trigger off a debate about Japanese vs. Australian workmanship. 😎