Aside from a stand-off cruise missile launcher, what possible use does this type have?
H-6 is basically a miniature B-52.
The hostility of the Just So Flawed crowd to what seems like every other aircraft program in existence never ceases to amuse.
H-6K – latest version cruise missile bombers (reengined with D30KP-2)
In another decade they can issue yet another upgrade with domestic engine derived from C919 project.
My grandfather was the joint secretary of the All India Muslim League, we designed Pakistan to be an Islamic state. It was the british trained bureaucracy and military that stole Pakistan from us. Another **** storm is coming if we regain her. Certainly Pakistan’s ties with the UK would come to question, but I doubt anything beyond diplomacy would come out of it.
My knowledge of Pakistan is very limited, but are you suggesting that the Islamization process begun under General Zia 1979 has been unsuccessful? That it hasn’t gone far enough? The accounts I have read posit Zia’s reforms as a turning point for the nation — for the worse.
lets also not forget that the Queen of England is also the head of state of 15 other Commonwealth realms so Little old Britain still has some sway across the globe
What? Queen Elizabeth has the same relationship to England as to Australia; she doesn’t rule Australia on behalf of England any more than she rules England on behalf of Australia. Unless you’re planning to hold her hostage there is no leverage to be had.
There’s every chance it would have been solved by now if it weren’t for the meddling Iranians and a certain failed superpower stamping its feet and trying to re-live its past glory days.
Oh dear, there’s no need to bring the UK into this. ๐
Surprised at lack of Y-20 tbh. Mixes the best looking bits and bobs of C-17 and Il-76 together imo.
Maybe with new engines, the current D-30s seem a little undersize for the airframe. I agree that it has promise, tho!
*C-2 pic*
Hope Japan will allowed this for export market.
KC-390 and C-2 have similar appearance (obviously one is larger than other) but I find KC-390’s proportions more pleasing.
Belfast C-1
Trรจs elegant! :applause:
A few of those I can understand, but the C-17? It’s just a bit too squatty looking for my tastes.
I agree that C-17 is heavy-set, but in a way that reads powerful (and yet still with a degree of grace) rather than slothful or brutish or simply big — the traps that C-5/An-124 fall into.
A poster on BR raised the notion of C-17 = Vidya Balan (like Rafale = Katrina Kaif, Typhoon = Kareena Kapoor) and I find this an agreeable sentiment.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]217881[/ATTACH]
๐ฎ
Far better to invest in IADS than attempt to take JF-17s head-to-head with Flankers.
The only problem with JAS-37 Viggen as a point of comparison is that probably fewer people are familiar with it than with the F.1, which kinda undermines the point of the comparison!
My guess is bye-bye to the metal cowlings too, note the model on Pogosyan’s desk @ 02:40 on Peregrinefalcon’s vid above.
Well spotted! :applause:
I don’t know enough about Mexico to even begin to speculate about the forces that could bring about a major re-evaluation of its strategic posture in line with what we would ordinarily expect from a nation with its population and wealth … except to wonder if the process might not resemble the development of Italian fascism in some respects.
In any case one can certainly get behind proposals to streamline platform types, logistics, training, and so forth. Mexico would seem to have an advanced case of the general institutional malaise that affects most nations to a greater or lesser extent, and which makes internal more than external issues the more pressing constraint on the growth of capabilities.
Mind if you look at the breakdown (in the link) Mi-17s outnumber all the other contributing platforms put together!
I think India’s selections of American hardware in recent years have been sensible enough; the only one I really question is Apache over Mi-28N.
how can you even begin to put the JF-17 into this thead? Not that many people comparatively speaking have even heard of it.
I don’t know, if you go by forum discussions it seems plenty controversial. People seem to start foaming at the mouth every time they hear about it, in fact. You can argue that a lot of that is pushback to the whole DSI!!!!1 thing, but it’s difficult to separate the chicken from the egg at this point.
Shiv Aroor has a good write-up of IAF activity in Uttarakhand in response to recent flooding:
The massive flood relief operations in the north Indian state of Uttarakhand has seen the Indian Air Force and Army Aviation corps deployed in the greatest strength since the 2004 tsunami in the Indian ocean. 45 Indian Air Force aircraft, 11 choppers from the Army, and a small fleet of civilian rotorcraft are working round the clock — and against time — to evacuate the most hostile areas of stranded pilgrims and tourists, a week after the state was ravaged by early monsoon flashfloods and torrential rain. The situation remains critical, but the one thing it has done is underscore the importance of two contracts in the pipeline by the IAF as being well worth the time and money that will be spent.
The first is the Lockheed-Martin C-130J Super Hercules. The IAF has three flying out there, landing on short airfields in bad weather — something it wouldn’t do with any of its other transports — conducting all manner of relief, including personnel insertion, standby hospital services, fuel delivery, evacuation of patients and pilgrims, reconnaissance, surveillance and disaster mapping.
[…]
The second is the IAF’s selection of the Boeing CH-47F Chinook. The IAF has a lot of helicopters over Uttarakhand right now, but only one heavylift Mi-26, possibly the only airframe still serviceable. The IAF chose the Chinook over a new generation variant of the Mi-26 in a competitive selection that ended last year. The Mi-26, a glorious chopper that happens to be the largest ever that went into production, is still gravely unsuited for operations in mountainous areas, where its large footprint severely limits where it can hover and land. It’s immense downwash is also a problem during emergency evacuations. IAF pilots I’ve been speaking to say they can’t wait till the Chinooks arrive, since their design and capabilities lend perfectly to rescue and relief operations in tricky terrain in all weather.
Well, looks like Baltisky finished the Mistral stern within the contract timeline.
Also I am fairly pleased with the extent of the work completed in RUssia:
Is there any word on how the technology transfer side of things is coming?