dark light

Rii

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 2,221 through 2,235 (of 3,311 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: F-35 debate thread. #2304176
    Rii
    Participant

    @Rii:

    1. There is no such animal right now as an opposing 5g (let alone 5g+) fighter. What is out there are years behind the F-35 in development.
    2. You’re forgetting that the F-35 is a F-16 replacement, not an F-15 replacement.
    3. Let’s wait till they actually fly publically (with all the avionics & weapons loaded) before we start claiming that they beat the F-35.

    I think I’ll call on SpudmanWP to handle this one:

    You cannot plan development & purchases today based on today’s battlefield, but on what it could or would likely be in 10/20/30/40 years.

    One of the reasons why we need more F-35s is due to there only being 187 F-22s (with ~120 or so combat coded)

    It has a longer combat range that what it is replacing while being more survivable.

    The same would be true of a Block 60 F-16. So what? The point is that it isn’t well-suited to USAF’s long-term requirements. And neither is the short-legged F-22 for that matter. 6th gen is likely to be in the F-111 class — at least.

    in reply to: F-35 debate thread. #2304201
    Rii
    Participant

    You cannot plan development & purchases today based on today’s battlefield, but on what it could or would likely be in 10/20/30/40 years.

    The problem is that F-35 isn’t relevant over those longer time scales. It doesn’t have the performance to handle opposing 5G+, and it doesn’t have the range to handle the Asia-Pacific or Arctic theatres. And as an air defence asset it is decidedly unoptimised. The long-term utility of the platform is essentially limited to operating from friendly bases in the Middle Eastern theatre, against semi-capable opponents such as Iran.

    The irony of your comment is that F-35 is indeed a product of 90s thinking — and it shows.

    in reply to: IRIAF F-14AM Upgrade #2304254
    Rii
    Participant

    The Iranian maintenance facilities for the F14 are not sub-standard by any reasonable measure, they are a replication of Grumman’s manufacturing and maintenance facilities in the US. In the 70’s Iran paid America a vast sum to upgrade their local aerospace industry and install manufacturer grade maintenance facilities. It is one of reasons why Iran has been so able to keep its legacy US fleet running even with the post revolution purges.

    This Grumman promotional documentary explains:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hfbz50gwsRM
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sVlrqv30o1k
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rWffHA6A1R4&list=PLB52A0DC8D621C046
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VIz9nt8cutw&list=PLB52A0DC8D621C046

    Thanks for the clips; interesting stuff!

    in reply to: IRIAF F-14AM Upgrade #2304413
    Rii
    Participant

    but in this day and age its a bit long in the tooth.

    Not really. The airframes are on average, what, five years older than the F-15Cs USAF plans to keep operating till 2030? They don’t have to worry about cat/trap cycles like USN’s F-14s. The problems are sub-standard maintenance facilities and upgrade paths.

    Why would this be considered news?! How flippin hard could it possibly be to integrate the R73?!

    A lot harder than strapping Sidewinder to F-35 and we got plenty of coverage about that. :rolleyes:

    Rii
    Participant

    Yes, Russia is strong and has a bright future — brighter than Japan, certainly. Lots of people underestimate Russia but going to the other extreme by comparing it to China doesn’t add credibility. Adjusted for MIC, geopolitics, etc. Russia is likely to emerge and remain as the third or fourth most important state in the global system for the forseeable future. No need to get greedy. :p

    in reply to: F35 News only thread for 2013 #2304998
    Rii
    Participant

    So the F-16 and F-18’s need not be replaced??

    Not USMC’s F/A-18s. As for the F-16s, nothing wrong with a few hundred for air defence duty (but F-35 isn’t exactly optimised for that role) but most of them aren’t needed either. The A-10s can go without replacement also.

    in reply to: Rise of the 6th Generation Fighter … #2305146
    Rii
    Participant

    Should be a relatively conservative program for service-entry in early 2030s with more ambitious proposals (DEW, hypersonics, etc.) merged with concept formerly known as the 2037 bomber. Doubt they’ll be that smart tho.

    in reply to: YAL-1 vs gen 4.5 , gen 5 fighter #2305150
    Rii
    Participant

    uber-EODAS + ESM much easier, and probably almost as effective vs. VLO platforms.

    in reply to: F35 News only thread for 2013 #2305167
    Rii
    Participant

    More fears about a “death-spiral”. http://news.yahoo.com/insight-expensive-f-35-fighter-risk-budget-death-201135601.html

    “It’s a house of cards,” said one senior defense official who is familiar with the F-35 program, but was not authorized to speak publicly. “We have finally started improving performance on the program and efficiency in testing, and bang, we get this budget challenge.”

    What budget challenge? DoD budget is at near-Reagan levels even with full sequestration. The Pentagon wouldn’t know a budget challenge even if one came up and screamed ‘Sea Control Ship’ in its face. :rolleyes:

    More accurate appraisal would suggest that there is no conceivable level of wanton fiscal profligacy that can make this program work as intended. The disconnect from reality, enshrined in the program from conception, is simply too vast to bridge.

    Ultimately the failure of the F-35 program isn’t really a problem for the United States (except insofar as it reflects more systemic issues) as the nation doesn’t actually need to replace the vast majority of the aircraft F-35 was intended to replace, but until the inevitable dawn of that reality it’s fun to watch USAF et al. attempt to fit round peg into square hole.

    in reply to: J-20 Thread 8 #2305208
    Rii
    Participant

    No, … at least not IMO !
    We have already seen the J-20 with new engines and even without that mysterious painting/coating. IMO it’s simply one AL-31FN with the nozzle full open and the other one closed.

    Probably this is so, but I have always been curious about the potential for J-20 to accept a larger engine than is currently fitted. Is there any hard info out there on the size of WS-15 in relation to AL-31/WS-10?

    Rii
    Participant

    +1

    The irony of folks rejecting economic projections (and the strategic implications thereof) over the course of 30-40 years, whilst simultaneously talking of the need to procure e.g. F-35 with the challenges of the next 30-40 years in mind never ceases to amuse.

    in reply to: YAL-1 vs gen 4.5 , gen 5 fighter #2305608
    Rii
    Participant

    At least Dale Brown had the sense to put it on a B-1.

    in reply to: F35 News only thread for 2013 #2305612
    Rii
    Participant

    so any estimate as of now is a bit premature.

    If estimating operating costs more than a decade and dozens of airframes down the line is premature, imagine how premature signing up for the program in 2001 would’ve been. :rolleyes:

    in reply to: KPAF discussion thread #2305838
    Rii
    Participant

    Since the Korean situation has been in the news more than usual this month, I’m wondering whether the KPAF is any more than a paper tiger? Do they even have the fuel, munitions and spare parts to mount any kind of intensive operation, let alone the trained pilots and crews to use them?

    Lack of munitions, spare parts, etc. doesn’t mean that they won’t go to war. NATO does it all the time. :p

    in reply to: F-4E vs. Mirage F-1CT #2305841
    Rii
    Participant

    Well that has to rank as one of the more bizarre posts in recent memory. Mirage F1 vs. F-22 and F-35 indeed. :rolleyes:

Viewing 15 posts - 2,221 through 2,235 (of 3,311 total)