dark light

Rii

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 3,031 through 3,045 (of 3,311 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: MiG-29KUB vs Su-33/J-15 #2374861
    Rii
    Participant

    I’m no expert, but intuitively it seems to me that a platform as heavy as the Flanker is not an ideal match for a medium STOBAR carrier and that under those conditions a Fulcrum-based platform would offer competitive or superior payload/range characteristics at reduced acquisition and operating costs.

    Anyone care to explain where I’m wrong in this?

    in reply to: Nice MMRCA News and Discussion 9 #2374865
    Rii
    Participant

    lol, what nonsense.

    Talking about scrapping MMRCA is one thing (I disagree with the proposal, but it’s not absurd) but replacing it with an F-35 buy? Yeah, right. :rolleyes:

    in reply to: Boeing vs Eurofighter vs Lockheed for KFX #2375182
    Rii
    Participant

    Course canards aren’t the only way to be interesting, I brought it up cos of this KF-X artwork floating around from a while back…

    http://img809.imageshack.us/img809/830/kfx201.jpg

    @ J-20: well they’re going to need foreign engines at least, prolly growth F414 or EJ200. Personally I would’ve thought a partnership with SAAB would be ideal; course maybe (hopefully) they’re already spoken for *cough* India AMCA *cough*.

    in reply to: Boeing vs Eurofighter vs Lockheed for KFX #2375294
    Rii
    Participant

    They all look boring as bat****. Where my canards at?

    in reply to: Russian Aviation thread, part V #2377257
    Rii
    Participant

    Love the Backfire images.

    I hope PAK DA ends up closer to a modern Backfire than, say, NGB.

    in reply to: Chinese pilot practicing carrier ops on Kuznetsov #2377545
    Rii
    Participant

    In other news Sikorsky is a Russian aircraft manufacturer. 😎

    in reply to: Hot Dog's Ketchup Filled F-35 News Thread #2377906
    Rii
    Participant

    By the way, I don’t think any F-35 “haters” (silly word that it is) predicted a Typhoon win in Japan.

    I predicted a Typhoon win in Japan.

    in reply to: J-20 Thread 7 #2377910
    Rii
    Participant

    They may want a EW or UAV controller.
    They should want a EW & UAV controller variant

    H-6 follow-on?

    in reply to: Performance #2379083
    Rii
    Participant

    but I am afraid these comparison is rather found upon shaky grounds.
    you just don’t know how hard the pilot is pulling back on the stick and the speed in the turn.

    Yeah … that Gripen pilot is taking it easy. 😎

    in reply to: Hot Dog's Ketchup Filled F-35 News Thread #2379187
    Rii
    Participant

    Are you sure that article/translation means what you think it means?

    If one of the variants gets a bullet in the back of the head it’ll most certainly be the ‘B’ variant…

    …In that case Italy and Spain better come up with a plan B (no pun intended) rather soon…

    Given the finances of those nations I think I have a pretty good idea of what that ‘Plan B’ is. Could be for the best in the long run if it results in increased pressure for European integration.

    in reply to: Russian Aviation thread, part V #2379468
    Rii
    Participant

    I suspect PAK FA will be navalised if only because Russia is unlikely to want to give carrier aviation away post-2020. Alternatives for the IAF include AMCA, MMRCA and, yes, the F-35. For my part I expect India will be looking at a 4-carrier fleet by mid-2020s (2x40k ton and 2x 65k ton) and that Russia will settle for two.

    in reply to: Russian Aviation thread, part V #2379532
    Rii
    Participant

    IN and Russian Navy are not the same navies, they use different carriers now and in the future. Naval PAK-FA may be too large for those small Indian carriers.

    Isn’t India’s second indigenous carrier (EDIT: Vishal) meant to be 65k tons, i.e. somewhat larger than Kuznetzov?

    in reply to: J-20 Thread 7 #2383545
    Rii
    Participant

    http://img31.imageshack.us/img31/8367/j2050.jpg

    Newish photo.

    I think I just squee’d.

    Yes, that’s a thing.

    in reply to: Russian Aviation thread, part V #2384033
    Rii
    Participant

    Money shouldn’t be sneezed at! Esp. for a nation in Russia’s position where its expertise outstrips the domestic funding to make use of it resulting in constant outflow of talent…

    China gets Russian expertise, Russia gets Chinese money. Is a good deal.

    in reply to: Russian Aviation thread, part V #2384605
    Rii
    Participant

    I assume the heavy helicopter is a modified Mi-26, not a totally new platform?

    Fingers crossed that it’s a brand new platform to put the CH-53K in its place! :p

    Rumours of Russian-Chinese cooperation on such a project have been going around for a while now, apparently China got interested in heavy lift choppers after observing their utility in disaster response. It’s nice to have the additional confirmation.

    I also echo a previous poster’s appreciation of the MiG-31 infos posted earlier. Fascinating stuff.

Viewing 15 posts - 3,031 through 3,045 (of 3,311 total)