Gosh, looking at all those concepts just makes one sigh at what might have been.
Thought I’d just pop these up here. Side aspect surface angles of the PAK FA showing the range at which beams projected from ground based radars have a 0 degree angle of incidence with the surfaces for various altitudes [….]
Cool post, now do J-20. 😎
So no new engine, no new radar, no new airframe … what did they actually change to earn all this fanfare?
In theory I should be very interested to hear and learn about different perspectives on the role of the Orthodox Church in Russian society today and in the past. In practice, the contempt evinced by TR1 and the predictably hostile response from others renders any useful or informative discussion impossible.
The success of Israeli airforce because its a Jewish state despite low education constraints.
Its time for Russia declare an Orthodox state and act accordingly. banks will be filled with money and even better airforce will be created.
Oh God I spoke too soon.
Leave it to JSR to bring the thread back on topic. 😉
I would’ve thought the extra expense of PD-14 over PS-90 would outweigh the improved SFC for a military airlifter that does not see the same flight hours as a commercial airliner.
The other thing is the J-20 is going to be the most expensive and complex fighter China has ever built. They won’t be able to build them like the J-10 let alone the J-7.
China’s defence budget today is about three times the size it was when J-10 entered service in 2005. Of course a lot of that is inflation, but even so China can afford to produce J-20 in numbers and should move as quickly as practicable to do so.
What China probably can’t afford to do is produce J-20 in numbers whilst producing a bunch of other stuff as well — which is fine, because China shouldn’t want to get stuck with a mountain of 3rd/4th generation aircraft in a 5th generation era.
While it would seem natural for J-20 to replace Flanker-type aircraft in production, the CAC/SAC split probably supports deprecating J-10 production first. Ongoing naval requirements for J-15 and the greater ongoing currency of the Flanker design in the strike role as against J-20’s more limited capabilities and advantages in that respect also argue for retaining Flanker production whilst deprecating J-10.
Assuming that JH-7 production has already ended, I would hope and expect that one of J-10 or J-11/15/16 will have wrapped up by 2020 to make way for full-rate production of J-20, and both lines by 2025.
May be defencetalk also does not publish neutral news because subscribers like you … I waited a few days to see if you will publish Agni-5 success article.
I don’t read/subscribe to Defencetalk, I saw the story linked on another form. I am glad to hear that the Agni V test was successful as I had not heard about that either. I don’t follow Indian defence news as closely as I used to because there is too much smoke and too little fire. Nonetheless I am always pleased to see concrete progress in Indian defence/strategic matters.
I was recently banned here for expressing my distaste at the image of various, mostly western multinationals circling India like carrion birds awaiting a tasty meal, so do not think I am biased against India. Nobody would be happier than I to see India stand on her own two feet as a superpower in this world.
J-20 having EFTs is perfectly compatible with the hypothesis that J-20 has a significantly better fuel fraction and range than F-22. J-20 could well have (for the sake of argument) 40% more range on internal fuel than F-22 and the capacity to mount up to four EFTs. Why not?
In any case it’s always good to see visual evidence of progress in testing and development. Now for the underslung AshMs…
You know things are bad when the best you can come up with is “don’t worry, our President doesn’t actually know what he’s talking about / can’t do the things he says he will do.”
Of course it’s perfectly true: Trump is just the clown on the throne, while all the real power is wielded by folk who are either unelected, bought and paid for by corporate lobbyists, or both. But then that doesn’t say much for American democracy.
Fourth Nirbhay Cruise Missile Test Fails
The missile had to be destroyed in mid-air after it deviated from its flight-path along the coast in Bay of Bengal soon after launch from the Integrated Test Range at Balasore off the Odisha coast around noon on Wednesday. “The test was an utter failure, with the missile veering to the right within two minutes of take-off,” said a source.
While the missile’s first test in March 2013+ had completely failed, the second one+ was dubbed “a partial success” in October 2014. But the third test+ in October 2015 and the one on Wednesday also failed miserably.
Can someone highlight the main differences between V1 and V2?
It used to have F-22 fins, now it has F-35 fins.
Looks uglier than the first time around.
With the big vertical stabilisers one can only assume that they are pitching it to PLAN as a carrier-based aircraft.
Frigate 054A overhead shots
Great photos, thanks. It really is quite an attractive design.
Why would Israel be interested in more F-15s when it has F-35s?
Let me guess … Boeing-affiliated Congresscritters are in a position to influence how much money is given to Israel.