dark light

Rii

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 961 through 975 (of 3,311 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Indian Air Force Thread 20 #2222566
    Rii
    Participant

    Indian Air Force Mirage 2000 Upgrade Progresses Despite Groundings

    http://www.ainonline.com/aviation-news/ain-defense-perspective/2014-09-19/indian-air-force-mirage-2000-upgrade-progresses-despite-groundings

    Lack of spare parts … where have I heard that one before? :rolleyes:

    in reply to: The PAK-FA News, Pics & Debate Thread XXIV #2222607
    Rii
    Participant

    I still don’t actually buy that T-50 will enter service with RuAF in 2016. Why rush to field a system that isn’t ready when Su-30, Su-35, Su-34, and MiG-35 are already in or nearing production?

    in reply to: The PAK-FA News, Pics & Debate Thread XXIV #2222696
    Rii
    Participant

    Speaking of Russia strong, where has JSR got to?

    in reply to: Indian Air Force Thread 20 #2223222
    Rii
    Participant

    Yes it is. EW suite, Glass cockpit (IDAS), HMS and EO pod on MK3 and Mk4. MK4 is weaponized to boot. Glass cockpit is on Mk2 as well. Mk3 and Mk4 have a more powerful engine and a new active vibration control system.

    Is this the ‘Rudra’ program or something separate?

    in reply to: Saab Gripen & Gripen NG thread #3 #2223260
    Rii
    Participant

    If France had focused on selling technology on hand and less about selling what it wanted to deliver, then they probably win. Instead of trying to sell Rafale, which wasn’t affordable, they could have been marketing a new Mirage F.1 using an M88. Get Brazil to build its airframe while the French built the high tech components from the engine to the radars. Let Brazil feel like its their design, but get something out of it.

    Gripen simply was the practical choice. It fits the country of Brazil’s needs. It fulfilled what both their air force and navy needed. Sweden isn’t exactly on par with France, but they do a better sales job obviously.

    I don’t think Brazil would’ve been interested in a souped-up Mirage F.1 or 2000 — they wanted a modern platform in all respects.

    Personally I think Brazil should’ve snapped up the Mirage 2000 line in the early 2000s. It would’ve been great for FAB, great for Brazilian industry development, and they could be exporting them throughout Latin America and around the world.

    in reply to: Saab Gripen & Gripen NG thread #3 #2223338
    Rii
    Participant

    Well, that explains why they’re looking at Sao Paulo — the future Brazilian carrier won’t be ready for another 10+ years yet.

    P.S. Instead of whining about Brazil choosing Gripen, France should be looking to get in on that carrier program and also using it as the basis for PA2.

    in reply to: Dassault Rafale, News & Discussion (XV) #2223432
    Rii
    Participant

    Budget cuts.

    More seriously, it is probably a condition imposed by the Baghdad government.

    in reply to: Indian Air Force Thread 20 #2223705
    Rii
    Participant

    By “electro-optical pods” are you referring to the ball mounted below the nose?

    in reply to: Indian Navy : News & Discussion – V #2027787
    Rii
    Participant

    A three way deal between Japan to supply India and Australia with advanced submarines would make things tough for China. And I am sure that at this point with the shenanigans of China in the South and East Seas many Asian countries would welcome China having feelings of encirclement.

    Australia is already considered an extension of the United States and its possible acquisition of Soryu class submarines changes little. The same is not true of India.

    As for welcoming China’s fear of encirclement, do you actually think these things through? Germany did not initiate WW1 because she felt overwhelmingly secure in her power, but because she felt increasingly vulnerable to the Franco-Russian pincer. A nation that is threatened will attempt to address that threat. The resulting increase in military spending would not only be unfortunate for humanity at large, drawing resources away from more productive pursuits, but would result in the balance of power tipping further in China’s favour more rapidly than it otherwise would, because China has far more reserve capacity to draw upon than any of her neighbours, most certainly including India.

    As for Indo-Sino relations more broadly, China has recently emerged as India’s largest trading partner and has just announced investments in India worth $100bn — three times the amount pledged by Japan. The new BJP government has embraced China warmly (for an overview, read here) and there is even renewed activity towards resolution of outstanding border issues.

    For all these reasons India would of course be sensitive to China’s strategic concerns. Given that there is no overwhelming reason to choose the Soryu boats in preference to other candidates (in fact they are likely to be even more expensive than offers from European nations, to say nothing of Russia), it is unlikely that such a purchase would be made.

    I would say the cheapest and safest way to address the issue is to order a couple of improved Kilo to recapitalize the russian built SSK line, signing an option to purchase two more if 75I program won’t take enough momentum.

    I agree that this seems the best stop-gap solution available. BlackArcher earlier noted a similar proposal.

    in reply to: Saab Gripen & Gripen NG thread #3 #2223717
    Rii
    Participant

    Not happening unless gripen NG goes CATOBAR

    I would’ve thought that was obvious? As a nation with CATOBAR experience and plans to build another carrier, Brazil is hardly going to want to step backwards to STOBAR.

    in reply to: SCOTTISH AIR FORCE #2223879
    Rii
    Participant

    Given the ‘no’ campaign’s focus on business implications, currencies, and other such dreary affairs, I find the following from Edmund Burke rather appropriate:

    But the age of chivalry is over. That of sophisters, economists, and calculators has succeeded; and the glory of Europe is extinguished for ever.

    The disease of economics may have affected England to a greater extent than any other nation, but truly it is the great affliction of our age. If a question such as national independence can be seen to hinge on a balance sheet, then truly there is no longer any nation there worthy of the name — merely the fossilised remains of what once was, the twitching nerves of an organism that has not yet realised that it is dead.

    in reply to: Indian Navy : News & Discussion – V #2027791
    Rii
    Participant

    There’s also the minor matter of Indo-Sino relations to consider. Buying major combatants from Japan is a sure way to heighten China’s feelings of encirclement and halt any progress in Indo-Sino relations.

    Defense Industry Daily is very pessimistic on the prospects for India’s submarine capabilities going forward, and lays the blame entirely at the feet of govt mismanagement:

    So, no tender. When there is one, we’re at 2017 for a winner. India will need to start retiring U209/ Shishumar Class submarines by 2016, or find an excuse to extend them past a 30-year safe lifespan. At the same time, 3 of the Navy’s early Kilo/ Sindhugosh Class boats would also be at or beyond a 30-year lifespan, for a total of 5 boats at risk this way before a Project 75i winner is even declared. Waiting another 8 years after a winner is declared brings us to 2025 for the 75i rollout, by which time all 4 U209s should be retired, and 8 of India’s 9 Kilo Class boats would have ages ranging from 34 – 39 years. Only INS Sindhushastra would be under the 30-year mark. That could leave India with its submarine force cut in half, when its current fleet of 13 is already acknowledged as inadequate to India’s strategic needs.

    In the mid-2000s, Admiral Prakash publicly stated an objective of “24 subs in 30 years.” A more likely outcome involves cutting the current operational fleet roughly in half by 2025, and returning to the current inadequate fleet size by 2030 – 2035.

    Comments?

    in reply to: SCOTTISH AIR FORCE #2223911
    Rii
    Participant

    Are you just bothered because Braveheart was directed by an Australian?

    Never seen it.

    in reply to: SCOTTISH AIR FORCE #2224013
    Rii
    Participant

    The fact that the major parties in Britain have only now agreed to major concessions to Scotland neatly illustrates the point made by Frederick Douglass all those years ago: “Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and it never will.”

    in reply to: SCOTTISH AIR FORCE #2224379
    Rii
    Participant

    The only remotely comparable country which doesn’t is Ireland, which shamelessly sponges off the UK for defence. Is that what you propose? A craven country, hiding under the wing of the state it claims it wishes to be free of? Extremely hypocritical.

    Insulting other nations isn’t likely to distract them from pursuing their own interests rather than yours.

    Just sayin’.

Viewing 15 posts - 961 through 975 (of 3,311 total)