Why is there no mention of the British legion of the RAFA?
They support veterans exactly like this and there may not be any need for all this rubbish in the press.
Some aircraft have chines, so do some ships. Aircraft also have waterlines, as do ships.
I think it looks like a `scuff` mark from a servicing ladder/platform.
Would they use a servicing ladder when it has built in steps?
If you are too old the the apprentice scheme at marshalls they also usually take on about 10 adult trainees every year. This is for people who are too old for the apprentice scheme but want a career or change of career.
You spend the usual 6 weeks of hacking and bashing in the training centre then you’re out on the aircraft, with one day a week, day release to college. You then end up with a NVQ3.
You’d get a very good experience of aircraft structures and sheet metal work, with the bonus that you can end up doing quite a lot of systems or even engine work.
When I worked there the adult trainees were so much better to work with compared to your average apprentice because they wanted to learn, and wanted to be there.
A fascinating set of photographs and, typically, shows the amount of stuff that has disappeared after just a few short years.
26/27 years is hardly ‘a few short years’ 😉
I think certain contributors to this thread need to concentrate on the subject of the thread and offer something constructive instead of nit-picking another contributor’s text.
I think that most people would understand the spirit of the comment and not try to find mistakes with the text of a post – that is, unless they have nothing better to do.
Perhaps you would like to try and suggest, or research, explanations as to why there were a couple of Lancaster engine frames on a hillside in Scotland instead?
27 years ago is the early eighties. As far as I am concerned, this doesn’t seen very long ago at all, hence the comment.
Anon.
Me thinks you really need to lighten up!
They do indeed get a full wash down afterwards (as do the SF Hercules after their beach landings / take offs), I’ve seen them doing this in quite choppy conditions, but as the aircraft approaches and settles in the water the wash from the rotors calms the water around it.
One thing I hadn’t realised is how little room there is for the ALMs in the back when those RIBs come speeding in!
Well having done Majors on SF C-130’s after they’ve been used to recover boats and do beach landings I can categorically state that washing down doesn’t work!
The last one I worked on required 8 lower beam caps and 7 belly skins due to corrosion!
Yes and RAF Barnham for housing? A former munitions MU with a large area once infested with a huge underground storage warren of narrow gauge railway sidings. I used to live there and whilst the camp was a lovely place to dwell, the old bomb dump (not the old SSA) was a pretty uninspiring place to be building a housing estate. Great for rallying old cars and ripping around on trials bikes though…:angel:
It’ll be sad to see it go. I have many fond memories of my time there, not to mention a few scars!
What a brilliant thread! I am not an engineer but tried ploughing through the info and this is how I would interpret it from a layman point of view:
“How you can make cheap aircraft structures with steel that are lightweight enough to be competitive”
powerandpassion, would love your input on this thread
Basically, I would love your input of designing something like a Embraer Super Tucano, except a cheaper version, using simple materials. A focus on being cheap and easy to build / maintain. We can’t use modern advanced composites. Something that can get 80% of the capability at a lot lower cost. What materials would you suggest?
I really do think if it was simple to get 80% capability for a lower cost, manufacturers would be doing it already! 🙂
With apologies for a degree of drift but the B52, first flown only 8 years after the end of the war, in service 2 years later, 10 % of the total built still in service and scheduled to remain in service until 2045, 90 years all told, remains the most outstanding of service longevity.
You could also add the C-130 into the mix if you are stretching the rules….
I thought it was a step above the usual TV fare and it was great to actually see some of the blokes involved being interviewed, normally they are just the faceless blokes in overalls in the background.
I’ve never seen riveting up a fuel tank described in such a dramatic manner!:D
Rivets look to have purple tails and mush heads (SP85?) and the slotted screws make it look distinctly British to my eyes.
PM sent 66 bars 😀
That’s a number any self respecting Hawk liney will remember! 😀
I still have the RAT acc access panel off ‘180, liberated from the fire dump after it crashed at Mona.
Did 154 ever get 3 plate brakes? I remember it always had to be different, and kept it’s 2 plate brakes long after everyone else had changed.
I can remember doing the odd flight servicing on it when I was at Valley in the 80’s and remember thinking how many detail differences there was on it. I seem to recall it was one of the last with 2 plate brakes.
They’re a lovely, simple aircraft that used be very reliable…. I had quite a shock when I was posted onto Tornados!
Why?