dark light

bloodnok

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 271 through 285 (of 741 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: E-Bay Dornier 17-P…thereby hangs a tail! #1214248
    bloodnok
    Participant

    This is getting very interesting, I am hearing that ripples from this thread are spreading out far and wide, and more people are becoming aware of similar problems, it seems that some people have been buying, perhaps trade buying, regularly from some dubious sellers and it seems knowingly or unknowingly selling on goods with history,

    So goods from the same seller end up in various other sellers hands spreading the net further and wider, perhaps this is a good opportunity for said people to come forward and clear themselves because the links are being made by others and mud will stick !

    I think that makes some sort of sense !

    Surely all the more reason to name names!

    in reply to: E-Bay Dornier 17-P…thereby hangs a tail! #1219913
    bloodnok
    Participant

    So ultimately this thread is useless. Unless his name is known, it doesn’t stop anyone continuing to be ripped off.

    in reply to: E-Bay Dornier 17-P…thereby hangs a tail! #1219939
    bloodnok
    Participant

    Why not just name the offender?
    I hate these threads that just intimate who it is. If there is definite
    proof of wrongdoing why not do us all a favour and post up his name?

    The whole reason of this thread appears to be to warn others to stay away from dubious sellers, how are we meant to, if we don’t know who he is!

    I’m all for being circumspect and vague if there’s no absolute proof of wrong doing, but previous posts allege to have proof so why not name him?

    in reply to: Stinson L5 Sentinal N6438C #1160512
    bloodnok
    Participant

    Are they? I didn’t think they were common but there’s a fair number in the US and Australia (five airworthy?), at least one or two in Europe – about normal for a wartime type with limited civil use, I’d have thought.

    By rare I meant the only one in the UK.

    in reply to: Stinson L5 Sentinal N6438C #1160633
    bloodnok
    Participant

    I got shown around it by the owner a couple of weeks ago whilst collecting another aircraft, I didn’t realise they were so rare.

    in reply to: Is Concorde really a "British" design? (2009 thread) #1165811
    bloodnok
    Participant

    No Morris Minor

    There’s a man who doesn’t know his motoring history!
    The original Morris Minor (1929 – 1934) was a very British design , the first ever £100 car and went on to spawn a very popular family of MG sports cars , the original MG Midget.

    in reply to: Fenland and West Norfolk Avation museum #1171781
    bloodnok
    Participant

    where abouts is this museum?

    in reply to: Airliner in nosedive over British city. #567846
    bloodnok
    Participant

    The report said: “The absence of a formal post-flight debrief and formal written record resulted in the balance tabs, attached to the elevators of the aircraft, being adjusted”

    That sounds like un recorded work to me.

    Rgds Cking

    That to me says the pilot asked the groundcrew to adjust the trim tabs, but didn’t write up a snag.
    The groundcrew adjusted the tabs, but because the snag wasn’t written down anywhere, they adjusted it the wrong way.
    I’d have said the ground crew would have written up the work correctly, otherwise there’d be no record of them of the moving the tabs the wrong way.

    This is a classic human factors issue.

    in reply to: Interesting Propellor Discovery #1175985
    bloodnok
    Participant

    It’s got three blades….. :confused:

    in reply to: What RAF aircraft are capable of Air to Air Refueling #2448417
    bloodnok
    Participant

    None could at first, not sure now. I would think the remaining fleet of Kilo model as well as the Julliet have the capability.

    Simple answer is yes.
    ‘K’s have a fixed probe, (modded for the Falklands), and ‘J’s have a removable probe.

    in reply to: What RAF aircraft are capable of Air to Air Refueling #2448872
    bloodnok
    Participant

    None could at first, not sure now. I would think the remaining fleet of Kilo model as well as the Julliet have the capability.

    Simple answer is yes.
    ‘K’s have a fixed probe, (modded for the Falklands), and ‘J’s have a removable probe.

    in reply to: Smoking jets #1200101
    bloodnok
    Participant

    A very good example of a very smokey aircraftthat still in widespread service is the good old C-130. The newer ‘J’ models are ok, but all the old ones smoke like a nervous beagle!

    in reply to: Interesting addition to FAA Register #1204923
    bloodnok
    Participant

    That is stunningly gorgeous!

    in reply to: Seaplanes concerned #1205017
    bloodnok
    Participant

    There was an artists impression knocking round of a C-130 on twin floats, I don’t think it ever got built though.

    http://www.dougronan.com/ontario/images/OSAinteresting_floatplane_pictures.htm

    in reply to: Aircraft Mirror?? #1212003
    bloodnok
    Participant

    looks to be a fairly standard saloon car interior mirror from the 30’s/40’s.

Viewing 15 posts - 271 through 285 (of 741 total)