This is getting very interesting, I am hearing that ripples from this thread are spreading out far and wide, and more people are becoming aware of similar problems, it seems that some people have been buying, perhaps trade buying, regularly from some dubious sellers and it seems knowingly or unknowingly selling on goods with history,
So goods from the same seller end up in various other sellers hands spreading the net further and wider, perhaps this is a good opportunity for said people to come forward and clear themselves because the links are being made by others and mud will stick !
I think that makes some sort of sense !
Surely all the more reason to name names!
So ultimately this thread is useless. Unless his name is known, it doesn’t stop anyone continuing to be ripped off.
Why not just name the offender?
I hate these threads that just intimate who it is. If there is definite
proof of wrongdoing why not do us all a favour and post up his name?
The whole reason of this thread appears to be to warn others to stay away from dubious sellers, how are we meant to, if we don’t know who he is!
I’m all for being circumspect and vague if there’s no absolute proof of wrong doing, but previous posts allege to have proof so why not name him?
Are they? I didn’t think they were common but there’s a fair number in the US and Australia (five airworthy?), at least one or two in Europe – about normal for a wartime type with limited civil use, I’d have thought.
By rare I meant the only one in the UK.
I got shown around it by the owner a couple of weeks ago whilst collecting another aircraft, I didn’t realise they were so rare.
No Morris Minor
There’s a man who doesn’t know his motoring history!
The original Morris Minor (1929 – 1934) was a very British design , the first ever £100 car and went on to spawn a very popular family of MG sports cars , the original MG Midget.
where abouts is this museum?
The report said: “The absence of a formal post-flight debrief and formal written record resulted in the balance tabs, attached to the elevators of the aircraft, being adjusted”
That sounds like un recorded work to me.
Rgds Cking
That to me says the pilot asked the groundcrew to adjust the trim tabs, but didn’t write up a snag.
The groundcrew adjusted the tabs, but because the snag wasn’t written down anywhere, they adjusted it the wrong way.
I’d have said the ground crew would have written up the work correctly, otherwise there’d be no record of them of the moving the tabs the wrong way.
This is a classic human factors issue.
It’s got three blades….. :confused:
None could at first, not sure now. I would think the remaining fleet of Kilo model as well as the Julliet have the capability.
Simple answer is yes.
‘K’s have a fixed probe, (modded for the Falklands), and ‘J’s have a removable probe.
None could at first, not sure now. I would think the remaining fleet of Kilo model as well as the Julliet have the capability.
Simple answer is yes.
‘K’s have a fixed probe, (modded for the Falklands), and ‘J’s have a removable probe.
A very good example of a very smokey aircraftthat still in widespread service is the good old C-130. The newer ‘J’ models are ok, but all the old ones smoke like a nervous beagle!
That is stunningly gorgeous!
There was an artists impression knocking round of a C-130 on twin floats, I don’t think it ever got built though.
http://www.dougronan.com/ontario/images/OSAinteresting_floatplane_pictures.htm
looks to be a fairly standard saloon car interior mirror from the 30’s/40’s.