dark light

bloodnok

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 391 through 405 (of 741 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • bloodnok
    Participant

    Tristars have/had equally sized and spaced doors. L1-3 being the same full size as R1-3.

    in reply to: Spotted #1244388
    bloodnok
    Participant

    Spotted this afternoon on the A14 near Bury-st-Edmunds, the fuselage of a 1920’s/30’s air racer type aircraft on a trailer.
    looked very much like a Mew Gull or something similar. in rubbed down red paint.

    in reply to: What Happened to Snoopy? #1246429
    bloodnok
    Participant

    Could create some interesting assymetric power characteristics?

    Imagine, taking off with two Allisons at full chat on one wing, the TP400 on the other, and they’ll still need the other engine in reverse! 😮 😀

    Similar things have been done before, you may recall a few years ago XV181 was converted to carry a C-130 J engine in the number 3 position.
    This was done to prove the aerodynamics of the nacelle and prop and get ‘flight’ figures.
    However it was a much simpler task as the engine/wing interface was very similar, so not much in the way of modifications was needed.

    in reply to: What Happened to Snoopy? #1246432
    bloodnok
    Participant

    Think both the L-100’s went to Safair.

    All three of Air contractors L100’s were always owned by Safair and were only ever leased to Air contractors. from memory they usually still had Safair markings on them somewhere at the same time as Air contractors.

    in reply to: What Happened to Snoopy? #1246541
    bloodnok
    Participant

    IIRC that the problem was the single shot fire extinguishers on all Allison turboprop engines. It stopped Air UK from having CV580 s years ago and caused no end of problems for Trans Meridians Herk plans. They eventually sorted something out when the Air Bridge Electras eventually got a UK C of A followed by Channel Express. ( Not sure what though)
    Hope it helps
    Be lucky
    David

    The fire bottle issue is one of the main reasons, also the other great stumbling block is the lack of emergency exits. the civvy L100’s have large emergency exits at the front, much like the later J models.

    in reply to: CURRENT RAF BASES – Any more to add? #2544949
    bloodnok
    Participant

    Its not RAF Wattisham any more, its just Wattisham Airfield and its run by the Army. the only RAF there are a few air traffic staff and the 22sqn rescue flight.

    in reply to: Heard today #1271710
    bloodnok
    Participant

    probably a mustang i see one over needham market/ipswich quite a lot.

    in reply to: Ian Smith has left us. #1271731
    bloodnok
    Participant

    it seems a very strange stance to take (well to me anyway!) that you are only allowed to discuss one aspect of a mans life and no other…..all at the insistence of one moderator!

    there have been many threads on here discussing past veterans lives, both favourable and unfavourable, why should this one be any different?

    then to say that posts should be only aviation related, and yet leave quite a few posts that clearly aren’t seems to be quite strange!

    it all seems like one moderators personal censorship to me!

    in reply to: What's hidden in RAF Storage? #1271880
    bloodnok
    Participant

    Whilst Honington is an RAF base, there are Army units based there as well as RAF regiment.

    in reply to: Tornado ADV and IDS, success or bust? #2548189
    bloodnok
    Participant

    Correct.
    And if these guy´s are complaining about the “blue cement” :dev2: radar of the ADV, what would they say about the N-001 of the late 80´s…
    A disaster?
    If there was a radar with a problematic development that was the N-001.

    it was ‘blue circle’…. not blue cement. blue circle was a brand of cement.

    in reply to: What's hidden in RAF Storage? #1272875
    bloodnok
    Participant

    Wattisham has various surplus gazelles stored in some of the HAS’s, plus a couple of written off/BDR gazelles kicking round.

    when i was Honingtonin the 80’s there was a prototype/pre production tornado stored in one of the old IX squadron HAS’s. i thought it had been moved when the aircraft left, but i’ve been told recently that its still there……

    in reply to: Tornado navigator killed #2549977
    bloodnok
    Participant

    He “Exited”, which means fell out. The Tonka ejection seat system bangs both crew out if one of them pulls the handle….as is the case for all multi-crew a/c. For the Tonka it’s the Navigator first, by a split second (If it was pilot first, the nav. would collide with him). So, if he did go out with his seat, there must have been a serious malfunction with the ejection system, which is very rare indeed.
    Obviously, there is some kind of serious malfunction somewhere.

    Condolences to the family and friends of course.

    not so….there is a command eject lever in the rear cockpit which you can set to both or individual. most fast jets with more than one seat i’ve worked on have had this system.

    in reply to: Trolly Acc bits #1280237
    bloodnok
    Participant

    you don’t want a leccy, you need a GSE (ground equipment) mechanic, they are the ones who used to look after them.

    in reply to: Yuck! #2552422
    bloodnok
    Participant

    it wasn’t unknown when i worked on Hawks with RAF to get the pukey student pilot back to clean up his own mess on occasion!

    in reply to: airfield,aircraft arrester wire systems #1291439
    bloodnok
    Participant

    i know all modern Tornado airfields had RHAG’s fitted, this was in case of thrust reverser failure (a not uncommon snag!) as the mainwheel brakes weren’t man enough to stop the aircraft by themselves (they only provide something like 25% of the braking force).

Viewing 15 posts - 391 through 405 (of 741 total)