Remember the Swift? When the guns were fired it disturbed the fuel air ratio through the engine.
C-130 in RAF service with the astrodome, was quickly removed because of noise on the flight deck
if you mean the cupola that fits over the front escape hatch on the c-130, you’ve got that wrong! a fair proportion of the fleet are modified to take them, and fly with them regularly.
what makes you say there will be no civil work done if they move mildenhall colhot?
But it (“Blue Circle”) is very funny, though.
oh yes!… 😀 i’m not denying that!
i really cant see the point of alertkens post.
you list a series of failures then say that i hope they’ve learnt from them, and then say this forum is for learning from.
can’t say i can see the board of quinetiq are going to be reading this forum, and suddenly see the light ” my god!, there’s been mess-ups in the past, best we learn from them!”
i really don’t think any of the mess ups listed above were deliberate, and i dare say the reason why the earlier ones weren’t published on the front page of the sun, was because then the other side would know we had duff weapons.
Consider this as “allegedly” as I’m not sure where my source got it from…
A new radar system for the Tornado was delayed, resulting in them having to carry a block of concrete in the nose as ballast to restore the weight balance.
given that RAF radars were all named as Blue something (eg Blue Fox), this was promptly christened “Blue Circle!
ADrian
that did occur, but that was just a system being late into service, so its not really relevant.
is there anything specific you’d like a picture of?
you cant get very close to the canopies (they are on top of the buildings there)
i’d not been there for about 6 months until today, and on the land next to it (as if you were driving past) they are building houses, so some of the stuff has been moved around, and it looks like some of it has gone.
sorry!…yup its gillings in diss if anyones interested.
and the wing is off a hawk (i spent long enough working on them!).
sorry, no pics, was just there this afternoon, having a mooch around.
if you know someone that needs the canberra perspex, and £60 looks like the right sort of money, i can always pick it up for them.
this may be of intrest to people who like cockpits, or even the rest of the plane!
there’s a scrap yard near me in the middle of suffolk that deal mainly in MOD surplus stuff, i’ve been going there off and on for years, as they sometimes have aircraft tools (help me in my job), anyway, they have a few bits of pretty old aircraft dotted around, so far i’ve seen
jet provost t3 bonnet (you know, the front bit that opens!), its a bit tatty, but would be better than nothig if you haven’t got one
aft part of the canopy for the same, frame looks ok, but perspex is a bit milky
hunter aft fuse (last 7ft or so) been used for battle damage repair
lightning single seater canopy, frame looks ok, perspex a bit milky
red top (?) missile i think!….looks like one off a lightning
a couple of other canopies, i thought they were hunter, but after looking at pics, they may be F.4 phantom.
canberra nose perspex (B1, B2?) in good condition with flat bomb aimers window
this is the only one with a price on, listed at £60
also there are a few instruments, and cockpit blackboxes, most of the black boxes are marked up ICS, and are for intercom. they have 2 dzus fastners each end.
there are also a couple of auto pilot ones as well.
a couple of fuel contents gauges, and a fuel flow gauge. these are about 2″ in diameter, and about 8 or 9 inches in depth.
there are a lot of lap strap buckles,
arm/leg restraint connecters off things like tornados and hawks
there were some of the small gauges off the side of a tornado
ecm pod off a tornado
a couple of older drop tanks, and the nose off a large pointy drop tank (looks like a sea vixen radome, but its made of alloy)
the outboard section of a crashed hawk wing (outer 5ft or so)
also in the various rooms and storage areas are quite a few old test sets for various aircraft systems (mostly avionic ones), although there is a fuel flow test set.
out front is what looks like a pretty complete weapons loader, with a small engine on the back to power it.
there used to be a very battered aft fuse from a chipmunk (from about the battery bay back) that still had remnants of the old dayglo marking on, but i couldn’t see it this tme.
there’s also a farly good stock of various aircraft tooling, all ex RAF, things like Hitorque bits, spanners , sockets etc.
just about all the aircraft parts have been there at least 10 years, out in the open (apart from the canberra nose perspex, i’ve not seen that before), but look like they may still of some use. the small yard is full of ex MOD stuff, from crockery, to bits of landrovers, flying clothing to table cloths! (they have a small shop in the town selling military clothing).
if this sounds of intrest, i’ll post the name of the yard up, and its location.
i think in the forces there’s a definate them and us divide between groundcrew and pilots, although after a few beers that divide does start coming down!
i think a lot of it is down to the british military background, our company pilots can be a little standoffish at times, but when you get chatting to foreign military aircrew, or civilian aircrew, there’s no barrier at all.
PPL pilots (on the rare occasion i deal with them) always seem more down to earth.
we get a lot of spotters where i work and where one of the popular places to park is right next to our engine running bay, and i’ve often wondered why they’d sit within a hundred yards or so of an aircraft on full chat for hours on end!….the one good thing about it is that it means they fill the lay-by up, so the speed camera van can’t park there!
i’ve one funny story involving spotters, many years ago i was in the RAF up at RAF valley, and a popular place to spot was at the end of the runway on the little track to the beach, well one day they got a lot more than they bargained for, one of our aircraft was taking off, had just got his main wheels in the air, when it encountered a flock of birds!….several of which were ingested, the pilot stuck it back down in rather a hurry, started braking hard (Hawks are well known for being a bit dodgy in the brake department), but still took the barrier at the end of the runway.
the barrier is designed to take a hawk at a maximum of approx 50knots, this aircraft was doing over 90 knots, so he ended up taking the barrier with him, crossing the peri track, straight through the fence, and into the car park full of spotters, scattering them!
the aircraft ended up in a big bramble patch, with a big dent under the jet pipe, and the nose leg was ripped out, both the crew were fine…..luckily no spotter were hurt either!
Not surprisingly, you can’t contact the ‘seller’ – so maybe eBay recognise this farce too….
If not the legitimate owner, eBay frown upon you selling bits on there.
DON’T BUY 😮
ask the seller a question works fine for me
i take it you mean the 2006 season…
at the risk of playing devils advocate, so far we’ve had people posting that they believe the yellow was added after the abondonment of ground crew, but with no proof.
and the counter argument from the doubters, that “basically its just rumour control, and highly unlikely”….again with no proof!
perhaps if a little had evidence was posted, then the argument might seem a little more credible.