dark light

bloodnok

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 91 through 105 (of 741 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Vulcan at Southend #1079373
    bloodnok
    Participant

    Did a nice 8 minute display at Wattisham as well.

    in reply to: Volandia Museum, Malpensa. #947031
    bloodnok
    Participant

    Same engines. Different cowlings (reduction of the front opening, smoother housing for the oil coolers, etc.). It’s what’s left of the Transair modification that was done to several Daks post-war to improve on aerodynamics, the original mod also included full main wheel doors, which were later removed on this particular aircraft.

    Ah, thanks.

    in reply to: Seen On Ebay Thread (August 2011) #947806
    bloodnok
    Participant

    If people can’t see beyond a picture then they deserve to taken for mugs. The title clearly says ‘part’ and the text says ‘part’. I can’t see what the issue is.

    in reply to: Volandia Museum, Malpensa. #948829
    bloodnok
    Participant

    Strange cowlings on the Dc-3. Different engines?

    in reply to: RAF Propellers X or + #951423
    bloodnok
    Participant

    The correct way is vertical cross and usually with number one blade (marked with a black or yellow circle) at the top, especially if the aircraft is to be parked for more than a few hours or any length of time in cold weather conditions. This is to prevent oil getting past the Beta Feedback Shaft Seals. I am reasonably sure this is mentioned in Safety and Servicing Notes and the Prop AP/TOs and there was if I remember rightly a Lockheed Service News article about it.

    The other very good reason for leaving them in + not x is that during your preflight walk around you check that the Prop Brake is working and also the prop and engine are free to rotate. If you leave them in X you have to get a ladder out to do the check. (There was a Flt Engineer known as Micro Eng who had to get a ladder out for the inboards but that is another story).

    The Americans would often use the X though and the only explanation I ever got was it made the aeroplane look sexier.

    This is the ‘correct’ reason. If the aircraft is to be left longer than overnight, then No.1 blade to the top to stop the oil draining out.
    If you’re parking up overnight then you can leave the blades where they’ve stopped.

    in reply to: Yes or no? #956903
    bloodnok
    Participant

    you dont really see it being used much on live aircraft due to the gradual build up of weight, especialy if more was used on one side of the aircraft than the other as it upsets the trim.

    with filler on statics i dont see a problem. panel beating if it is done correctly is an art and is not advisable to start thrashing away on a skin that you may end up making worse.. the trouble lies in the memory of the metal, when it is sharply dinged the elements its made of have been stretched beyond its normal flat state. so when you come to flatten it the metal wrinkles and creases unless your real carefull during the process. during flattening you may have got rid of the dent but have ended up moving the pressure from the dent to another part of the skin creating wrinkles or creases.

    its best done with a heavy block of something on one side of the ding to absorb the (gentle taps) blows from the hammer on the other..

    its very rewarding when its done though

    I think just about every large aircraft I’ve seen resprayed has had filler used on the smaller dents (airliners and cargo aircraft), usually applied after the initial primer coat then DA’d smooth.

    Knocking dents out can be done for the smaller ones, but often the deeper dents are out of limits for the SRM and often won’t come back out fully as the metal has stretched and you end up with the skin ‘panting’ (oilcaning for our American friends). You end up having to repair it.
    I don’t see anything wrong with filling a static aircraft as long as you don’t loose lots of rivet lines.

    in reply to: Jaguar panel fasteners #957035
    bloodnok
    Participant

    I haven’t, will look, from memory dome headed, about an inch and a half long, about three quarters of inch in diameter smooth shank which is hollow and internally threaded, head is about an inch in diameter.. Two preside under the little plates are Allen headed bolts.

    What about the scrappie in London that melted down the Tate one

    The fasteners you describe sound like Tridairs. The Hawk used them extensively and they’re still in use today.

    in reply to: Machining the Mosquito #957037
    bloodnok
    Participant

    We have one of those machines in work but we use it mostly for metal. We use it making repair pieces. It makes things so much easier. Even something as simple as a circular patch with evenly pitched rivet holes looks so much better. No more compasses and measuring. 😀

    If you combine one of these machines and a brake press you get factory standard parts.
    One thing that does surprise me is that the machine in the video doesn’t have the hoover attachment around the router cutter, that would stop most of the dust and swarf getting everywhere.

    in reply to: Unknown Aircraft Exterior Panel ID #976364
    bloodnok
    Participant

    I seem to recall the centre wing lids were square and the reason the went to oval when we re-planked them was to stop cracking from the corners. It’s definitely not off a ‘J’, they are oval.
    Perhaps it’s off an Electra or Orion?

    in reply to: Yesterday Channel – "Who Betrayed the Bomber Boys" #977006
    bloodnok
    Participant

    I find it sad that all the good work bomber command did during the war is overshadowed by Dresden.
    The sacrifices the crews of the daylight bombers made early in the war don’t get a mention, where who squadrons of Battles were wiped out. The precision bombing by the likes of 617 , the raids on the V weapon launching sites etc ,etc.
    I also find it strange that the American carpet bombing of the Japanese homeland before the nukes were dropped never seems to get a mention. The loss of civilian life there was horrendous and is arguably their Dresden.

    in reply to: Unknown Aircraft Exterior Panel ID #977881
    bloodnok
    Participant

    It certainly looks like a dry bay lid (bay behind each engine).
    It could well be an early one as I recall the ‘square’ outboard lids had 2 access flaps and the centre wing ones were oval on the new wings (post 80’s).
    Also the screws on the the later lids were Hi torques (Sort of slotted)not NAS517’s (Phillips).
    I believe when the centre wings were rebuilt on the RAF ones the tank lids went from square to oval.

    in reply to: Sad end to a Breguet Atlantic #1011833
    bloodnok
    Participant

    Typical, Where was the waste and environmental management? What a joke! 😡
    All the Sh1t that we have to adhere to here and the non-uk europeans under ‘stringent’ EU directives, just smash it to bits and let whatever is in it come out and spill everywhere.
    It really does cheese me off. 😡
    If anyone did that so publicly here in the UK, they would be for the high jump, but not onto a crash mat.

    I really don’t see what the problem is. That was a very small amount of fuel that leaked out and it was cleaned up. The rest of the aircraft is going off for recycling, what’s the problem?

    in reply to: More mystery objects #1056190
    bloodnok
    Participant

    They do look similar to C-130 fwd nose u/c door hinges…..but they aren’t. Despite what previous posters have said, they bolt on and are undercarriage door hinges. 😉

    in reply to: Drop tanks / belly tanks #1075497
    bloodnok
    Participant

    If You wanted to take several passengers or make a camper van you could use a C130 external tank… 😀

    in reply to: Phantom Comes Together #1081078
    bloodnok
    Participant

    Assembly – All credited to Maggie Aggiss

    I was having a bacon butty with the chap driving the forklift today and he didn’t believe me when I said I bet there’s a picture of you on the internet already! 😀

Viewing 15 posts - 91 through 105 (of 741 total)