dark light

bloodnok

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 106 through 120 (of 741 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Phantom XT914 Coming Home #1024127
    bloodnok
    Participant

    Various pictures of XT914 are now filtering through showing the unloading operation at Wattisham! Top marks to JARTS and REME !

    Any chance of a link to some of them? I know one of the chaps involved in unloading.

    in reply to: Phantom XT914 Coming Home #1033522
    bloodnok
    Participant

    Various pictures of XT914 are now filtering through showing the unloading operation at Wattisham! Top marks to JARTS and REME !

    Any chance of a link to some of them? I know one of the chaps involved in unloading.

    in reply to: Why would an RAF flight helmet be red? #1026293
    bloodnok
    Participant

    On Hawks and Tornados in the 80’s we used to have standard aircrew bone-domes painted red for ground running. They were usually sprayed by the painters, not just brush painted.

    in reply to: Why would an RAF flight helmet be red? #1035952
    bloodnok
    Participant

    On Hawks and Tornados in the 80’s we used to have standard aircrew bone-domes painted red for ground running. They were usually sprayed by the painters, not just brush painted.

    in reply to: Mystery UK forces mobilisation today 2/2/12? #2346334
    bloodnok
    Participant

    I know why they were called back of leave and where they’re going….. 😉

    in reply to: Wanting to be an Aerospace Engineer #555295
    bloodnok
    Participant

    Have you considered the RAF? The closing age for aircraft technician is 29. You would get a good training, get paid, get loads of expierince and get civilian qualifications at the end of your time.

    Rgds Cking

    I’m not sure you would get the experience to be honest. A hell of a lot of second line stuff is done by civvies now, so you’re just left with flight servicing and rects.

    in reply to: Restoration veil of secrecy #1047075
    bloodnok
    Participant

    The thing i don’t like is the type of posts we get here sometimes….you know the ones….’I know something you don’t’…..’but I wont tell you’…..wish they would just keep it to themselves.

    That’s one of the most distasteful parts of this forum. There’s a lot of cryptic posts from people on the ‘inside’, hinting at stuff to others in the know and when asked to expand use the old caveat of, sorry can’t say.

    Some of these posts are deliberately misleading to sort of big them up (I was helping on the same project, and no such requests for secrecy were issued!) and make the poster look all the more like they knew something others didn’t.

    If you can’t post all the details, why post at all?

    in reply to: What is this seat from? #1077159
    bloodnok
    Participant

    Herc Nav seat I think

    Definitely not Herc. I’ve fitted enough of the things over the years.

    in reply to: What is this seat from? #1081954
    bloodnok
    Participant

    My thought was Herc –

    http://www.lockheedmartin.com/data/assets/sts/Images/c130j2.jpg

    Nimrod was a possible as well, but looking at pictures the arm rests seem to rotate when in the up position to tuck in behind the seat backpad. Whereas these dont.

    Jon

    Definitely not Herc. 😉

    in reply to: Operation Telic 1991 – Tornado's Mission Tallies #2374565
    bloodnok
    Participant

    They look like palm trees to me!

    in reply to: UC discovered in Thames #1022050
    bloodnok
    Participant

    I Know the angled pivot point might preclude it, but could it possibly be a nose leg with the scissor links disconnected, and the cotton reels by the top link the towing arm points…?

    in reply to: UC discovered in Thames #1029732
    bloodnok
    Participant

    I Know the angled pivot point might preclude it, but could it possibly be a nose leg with the scissor links disconnected, and the cotton reels by the top link the towing arm points…?

    in reply to: attack helicopters compared #2324920
    bloodnok
    Participant

    Apaches had a lot of issues operating in desert and maritime environments for quite a while. In fact, part of the reason the Marine Corps stayed with the AH-1 over the years was because of their reliability at sea, whereas I know the Army had some issues with the Apache at points in its career. Nowadays a lot of this has probably been worked out, although I admit I’m not sure what the current status is.

    Every military aircraft has issues from time to time, from fast jets to transport aircraft.
    I’ll bet even the AH-1 has had it’s own issues, so I’m not sure it’s really fair to mark the AH-64 down.

    in reply to: attack helicopters compared #2325061
    bloodnok
    Participant

    I still maintain that it’s probably a better overall value for your money given the enviornments it has been proven to be able to operate in with a minimal amount of fuss compared to the Apache.

    I’m confused…. The Apache operates off boats and off land with no fuss whatsoever.
    What is this ‘fuss’ you speak of?

    in reply to: F-104G Starfighter for sale, £25,000 o.n.o. #1047686
    bloodnok
    Participant

    Jet Art’s prices rarely seem logical or sensible, but he must be doing something right as he’s still in business.
    I think his prices are more aimed at the millionaire who wants something cool or unusual rather than enthusiasts or museums.

Viewing 15 posts - 106 through 120 (of 741 total)