dark light

Mark L

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 256 through 270 (of 3,714 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: BMI Airbus and the Red Arrows #496967
    Mark L
    Participant

    The bmi 319 making an appearance makes sense, as FlyBe are also placing an E195 in the flying display too. Good advertising for their respective London routes.

    Quite why the reds would get involved with one specifically is beyond me, unless the bmi marketing bods have got hold of a massive advertising budget that is just going straight out to the RAF…

    in reply to: Jet 2 Should??? #497442
    Mark L
    Participant

    Jet 2 should follow in Monarch footsteps and start to do charter flight’s.

    You do know Monarch were originally a Charter airline, who branched into offerring scheduled flights because the traditional Charter market is in decline, not the other way around?

    Irrespective of that, the Charter market isn’t what it once was anyway. The vast majority of “charter” flights from the traditional operators like Monarch, Thomsonfly, and XL can be bought online without buying a holiday through the same company at the same time.

    Additionally, travel agents like Thomson will happily sell you flights on BA, or Jet2 flights they have access to. It’s not like Jet2 are sitting there saying “we only want to sell in one place, on jet.com” they actively sell through a variety of different mediums, including their own in house “charter” arm Jet2 Holidays.

    in reply to: Heavy landing at London City. #497449
    Mark L
    Participant

    Tailstrikes can be deviously deceptive. An aircraft might look fine, but the stress throughout the aircraft can sometimes be horrendous, neccessitating a perfectly fine looking aircraft to be scrapped seemingly unneccessarily.

    in reply to: Scot Airways ditch Southampton and Amsterdam #497497
    Mark L
    Participant

    Yup, announced a few weeks ago now. Part of the consolidation to LCY following the CityJet marriage. Not to mention the onset of competition from FlyBe.

    in reply to: LBG 29/08/2007 Hotel Zulu Whisky Bravo Tango Seven #453387
    Mark L
    Participant

    All beauties! HZ-AB3 was the 1st 727 I ever saw, back in 2003 on a gliding day out at Lasham! 😀

    in reply to: LHR Bank Holiday Weekend #453533
    Mark L
    Participant

    Lovely shots. And I think I want Mr Spalding’s shirt…! :p

    in reply to: Stunning Weather At LBA!! 23-8-07. BIG Post! #454814
    Mark L
    Participant

    Great stuff Paul, the weather is truly stunning at the moment. Never seen anything like it in two years of living here!

    Is that spot down the footpath by the pan? I can’t quite place it?

    in reply to: New route for Jet2 out of LBA… #499216
    Mark L
    Participant

    Lubeck? Out of all the places in Germany they could have chosen they went for Lubeck? :confused:

    Oh well, bmi have just dropped Lille so we had to have a rebalance in the silliness level around here sooner rather than later! :p

    in reply to: Flybe Q400 in EDI emergency landing. #499616
    Mark L
    Participant

    That really doesn’t surprise me, Mark. Let me guess, you were supposed to be on the BE171 yesterday morning on JEDI? I was supposed to be dispatching the 172 which of course was cancelled. What day was your ‘attempted’ LBA-SOU?

    Correct. I was booked on the 174 on the 15th. 😡

    in reply to: Flybe Q400 in EDI emergency landing. #499626
    Mark L
    Participant

    After 19 FlyBe Q400 flights I’ve finally had my share of debacles with them.

    A simple LBA-SOU-LBA return trip…

    LBA-SOU ended up being cancelled due to a “tech” Q400, so it became MAN-SOU.

    SOU-LBA started fine, but after sitting for 15 minutes on the taxiway we returned to the stand and shut down. G-JEDI (the oldest in the fleet) went nowhere for the rest of the day, and once again I ended up back in MAN.

    After missing my Dad’s birthday one way, and turning up 5 hours late for work the other way, FlyBe are certainly not getting my business for an upcoming trip to GLA!

    in reply to: General Discussion #305024
    Mark L
    Participant

    And to think that as reported some locals are supporting them by providing food and whatever else for them to keep the protest going while the jobless layabouts are sucking the life out of their tax contributions.

    Exactement! I was reading one of the BBC interviews with some girl on the camp.

    Occupation: Full Time Protestor

    :confused:

    in reply to: Camp Climate Change at Heathrow #1926979
    Mark L
    Participant

    And to think that as reported some locals are supporting them by providing food and whatever else for them to keep the protest going while the jobless layabouts are sucking the life out of their tax contributions.

    Exactement! I was reading one of the BBC interviews with some girl on the camp.

    Occupation: Full Time Protestor

    :confused:

    in reply to: General Discussion #305058
    Mark L
    Participant

    The thing that really gets me going about this “camp” is that the entire organisation is set up under the premise of utilising direct action to get their points across. It is NOT going to be just a peaceful protest on a field.

    Thankfully the courts saw past the arguments of some of the total lunatics behind the operation and they are not allowed anywhere near the airport.

    However there are an awful lot of people down there who would like to do nothing more than smash the place up (I should know, I have to go to uni with some of them :rolleyes: ).

    Now although the total demolition of LHR would be a really good idea, and I for one would certainly pick up a sledgehammer to help destroy T4 (or maybe make that the FCC, not sure which I hate most!), the random actions of some deluded “protestors” are just going to cause cahos this weekend I fear. 🙁

    Stay away if you can. Hopefully the police are on top of things and it will pass without incident. I’m not so sure if it will or not…

    in reply to: Camp Climate Change at Heathrow #1927006
    Mark L
    Participant

    The thing that really gets me going about this “camp” is that the entire organisation is set up under the premise of utilising direct action to get their points across. It is NOT going to be just a peaceful protest on a field.

    Thankfully the courts saw past the arguments of some of the total lunatics behind the operation and they are not allowed anywhere near the airport.

    However there are an awful lot of people down there who would like to do nothing more than smash the place up (I should know, I have to go to uni with some of them :rolleyes: ).

    Now although the total demolition of LHR would be a really good idea, and I for one would certainly pick up a sledgehammer to help destroy T4 (or maybe make that the FCC, not sure which I hate most!), the random actions of some deluded “protestors” are just going to cause cahos this weekend I fear. 🙁

    Stay away if you can. Hopefully the police are on top of things and it will pass without incident. I’m not so sure if it will or not…

    in reply to: General Discussion #305181
    Mark L
    Participant

    quite how they are going to do this by illeagaly pitching a tent in a farmers field I don’t know!!!.

    It actualy belongs to University College London I think! They don’t seem too happy…

    And yes I quite agreee, all this climate stuff is just getting silly! :rolleyes:

Viewing 15 posts - 256 through 270 (of 3,714 total)