OMG! There is party going on next to that facility and some people here still talking about censor. I bet in a week we will have very detailed pictures.
It reminds me Su-37 (I dont mean it is a copy or anything) because of its apparent huge size, length, canards and engine placement.
… It becomes “pictures or it never happened”. So grainy photos appear, then it becomes “photoshopped” or “faked” or some other rubbish. so then eventually, like in the example of the T-50 photos of the first flight are revealed and (I have no doubts this will happen in the cae of the J-20) people start with the “it’s an obvious copy of XXXXX”…
Come on J-7… What you are showing officially cannot be the model of the J-20 because it is a model for another aircraft. Whereas there is at least a possibility that a CGI might be based on real thing. Also, both of them look really ugly. Hope both of you aree wrong 😀
I liked that old CGI which was published on Military Tech magazine as the mock up 😀
Had the A380 a few days ago not have experienced the engine problems it did, this relatively minor (in comparison) issue with a 747 would never have been brought to the attention of the world.
With the airline industry going through tough times at the moment, this unnecessary reporting could have catastrophic consequences for Qantas. At a time when every airline in the world is fighting to fill seats, Qantas has the added challenge of convincing the travelling public that they are a safe airline.
The A380 incident was news-worthy. The 747 not so.
wow, completely disagree. 747 event is so worth reporting even without 380 one. An aircraft carrying more than 400 passengers had to return. This was serious.
Sign In
