dark light

glhcarl

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 5 posts - 121 through 125 (of 125 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Part1-Manchester to Bergamo on Astraeus #419347
    glhcarl
    Participant

    “Any landing you walk away from is a good one”!

    in reply to: Greatest Cold War Fighter/Attacker #2607385
    glhcarl
    Participant

    You can´t have a one sided descision and it is hard to judge for the entire tiime frame.

    For the western side runners-up are :

    F-86 Sabre (no doubt about it)
    F-104 Starfighter (to arm many NATO Forces, although unpopular with the USAF)
    F-4 Phantom (NATO workhorse and my favorite)
    F-15 Eagle
    F-16

    WarPac :

    MiG-15 (the early jet)
    MiG-17 (early but long lasting and much loved)
    MiG-21 (developed from pure daylight F-104 like plane, to quite a capable all weather fighter)
    MiG-29 (bringing 4th genration aircraft to the WarPac. At least quie on paar with the latest the NATO had when it entered service)
    SU-22

    I like your list but I think you are over looking a great aircraft from that time period: The Douglas A-4 Skyhawk. The US Navy used them for every possible task, fighter, bomber, tanker, trainer, etc. The Israelis used them with great success, and they formed the back bone of the RNVAF.

    in reply to: Blackbird vulnerability #2611820
    glhcarl
    Participant

    It might have had something to do with the fact that the twin-seat SR-71s had more weight at the back end, having the extended tail and all. The SR-71C is an abberation, since it had the aft fuselage of the first YF-12, retaining the YF-12A’s ventral fins, albeit not the central one.

    The two seat A-12 had J-75 engines in lieu of the single seat’s J-58 engines. It was a Mach 2+ aircraft at best so the vertical fins were not required.

    in reply to: Blackbird vulnerability #2612284
    glhcarl
    Participant

    [QUOTE=flex297]Lets get real here, folks. What is so much stealthy about Blackbird’s intakes, which resemble a nose of MiG-21 in every way? How could Lockheed specialist calculate a stealth shape for not faceted design with the computer power typical for that time? And if there were able to do that, why for God’s sake the F-117A came out faceted decades later?

    The SR-71 was designed using slide rules (no computers), remember its design is over 40 years old. Also, I worked on SR-71’s for 1966 to 1969 in the airframe repair shop and we never had to repair a nose cone that melted. And offically no one has ever said that the SR-71’s (or the A-12’s) were stealth aircraft, what was offically stated that they had a deduced radair cross section.

    in reply to: Plane Help!! #547806
    glhcarl
    Participant

    Saudi A-340

    I saw the same A-340 almost every week when I worked at Brize Norton. I was told it was owned by the Saudi goverment. The Saudi royal family owns a fleet of aircraft too, known as Saudi Royal Flight, but they are painted in Saudia Airlines livery.

Viewing 5 posts - 121 through 125 (of 125 total)