making stuff up again, so who’s the big bad guy who claimed it never retracted up? some people made claims there were no internal bays but that’s about it.
No need to lie with the the stuff you can find in this forum alone. You just have to look at yourself. Look at Trimble in his blog surprised the J-20 did a roll. :diablo:
Oh how we forget the Pentagon estimated arrival of the J-20. Now all of the sudden because the DOD says it’s a strike fighter, it’s a strike fighter. Remember the people that said the J-20 had fixed landing gear because they never saw them retracted up in a pic?
I remember during the first Gulf War, there were actually people stamping their feet and pouting that the Iraqis shot back. Or how about all the crying over China having one carrier compared to the dozen the whiners have. Or how about when the J-20 was unveiled, some wanted it declared illegal. Yeah, there are only children on one side…
:diablo:
Yet for the Russians we know at least that they have designed some very effective aircrafts before. China on the other hand is not exactly famous for inventing ingenious machines. So I somehow can understand doubters.
Don’t get me wrong, sometimes there is no need to reinvent the wheel. Sometimes you can take the ingredients of other meals and make something better of it.
The same can be said for the majority of weapons out there where the same principles of their Chinese origins still apply.
Do u know chinese was the first choice as partner for Sino russia PafKa project but china reject Russia proposal and decide to go for their own 5th gen program. So India pick up where china discarded. and I am very sure it is a correct decision based on what we have seen so far from T-50 vs j-20.
And the propaganda in between that and before the emergence of the J-20 was China was begging to be a part of the PAK-FA but was turned down.
…But this wasn’t a parade, and in any case, if they wanted to brag,
they would pick the shortest possible maintenance guys in order to make the fighter look as huge as possible.
The Olympics wasn’t a parade either. I’m 6ft.
If you follow the pattern of military PR events in China like seen in the Olympics or at the National Day parades and it shows with the J-20 crew all dressed up in their uniforms these guys are probably all 5’10”.
You mean like how they got the J-20 predictions wrong among other things too?
But at what ranges?
Only people without a clue think stealth aircraft are actually invisible to radar.
All stealth does is drastically reduce detection ranges, but get a stealth plane close enough to a power radar and it will show up.
Since the Nighthawk is not launched from an aircraft carrier, I’d imagine it was some distance away for naval vessels to see it. I remember the British smirking they could see the F-117.
And allied naval forces during the 1st Gulf War said they could see the Nighthawk on their radars.
Clearly you got no aerodynamic thought out of your brain
From the guy taking credit from a drawing… :diablo:
an interestingly same part:diablo:
They both also have a pointy nose and wings.
It’s because the future is going to be the United States and the emerging world nations. The countries of Europe might as well being calling themselves states as in part of “The United States.” Since the US has a say on who you can sell to because Europeans use American technology, the power and money goes to the one that has veto power.
DSI technology isn’t a secret.