You have answered your own question. It is international airspace! The agreement is the 12 nautical mile limit. No different to the Soviet Union and Russia flying off the coast of North America. Where is the act of war when Chinese MPA aircraft take an interest in U.S vessels in internatonal waters?
TJ
You do know the US has skirted and violated international law recently in regards to the war on terror? And you can say that’s up to interpretation. And that’s why Americans will demand action if Chinese spy planes were to be able to routinely fly off the coast of the US. So agreements, laws, and rules are only conveniences. International laws are meaningless when one thinks on special cases they can be broken. Everyone who breaks international laws thinks it’s a special case.
Everyone who doesn’t believe the US would go nuts and bonkers if and when China could routinly send spy planes off the US coast must come from a position that everything is treated with fairness and equality.
The Chinese aren’t the Russians. Just like Russia has more to do with Iran’s nuclear program than China yet you only hear alarm over what they say China is contributing to Iran’s nuclear program. In the news recently was how the US Congress is up in arms and incensed that China is sending its own workers to build its embassy in Washington DC. For those that haven’t kept in touch with this throughout the years, the US is also building a new embassy in Beijing and back then before construction began, Congress demanded that no Chinese work on the US embassy for the fear of spying related issues. So why is the US so angry that China is doing the same with its embassy in Washington because of the very same fears the US has in Beijing? And we know the US has been caught planting bugs on the Chinese President’s plane while it was being serviced in the US by a private American company.
China doesn’t have a carrier yet the US, who has many, is already paranoid over the possibility of only one in the future. You don’t think there’s this exaggerated hypocritical paranoia the US has over China? I can go on pointing out a lop-sided paranoia on virtually everything. And you think the average American wouldn’t see a Chinese spy plane flying off the coast of the US as nothing less than a threat to US national security. If it happened, how many people in this forum alone would demand those planes be shot down?
And speaking of the US spy plane incident over China. Remember when the crew was being held… all those stories about the crew being tortured and the women being raped… Well when they were finally released, the crew said they were treated and fed very well. The only thing off was the pilot was once awoken in the middle of the night to be asked questions. Neo-cons in the government were screaming that was sleep deprivation torture and China violated their human rights. And to them water-boarding is not torture. Which ironically recently revealed was copied from torture techniques by the Chinese during the Korean War. So crimes are not determined by the act but by who commits the act. So what the Soviets did is really irrelevant.
Take a look at the alarm at just the talk of China building an aircraft carrier. Take a look at the alarm at the eventuality that China will have blue water navy that will patrol the Western Pacific. The US will definitely go ape-sh*t if all of the sudden Chinese spy planes were routinely flying off the coast of the continental US with the intention of gathering intelligence like the US does off the coast of China. Americans during the Cold War turned their allies the Japanese out to be more evil than the Soviet Union. Americans will be more alarmed and be insulted if Chinese spy planes routinely flew off the coast of the US.
If China flew spy planes off the coast of the US over international waters, it woud be considered an act of war.
A fly-by during the opening ceremonies would be interesting but I doubt it. Why? Because I believe the opening ceremony will be at night. You wouldn’t really be able to see it added to that the hole on top of the National Stadium isn’t large enough that a fly-by would probably be missed by nearly everyone with only the sound of their engines roaring over as evidence it happened.
If you’re talking about all the Boeings and Airbuses China has… China, as part of the agreement in purchasing, is not allowed to use those planes for military use especially when it comes to coverting them for military purposes. China already got some heat when they turned a 737 into a airborne command post. Never heard how that turned out.
Green Pine copy? nahhh china would never copy other country tech:D
The only thing similar is that it’s rectangular. That’s like saying every modern weapon system is a rip-off of ancient Chinese military inventions.
For those that don’t know, that’s Mao’s grandson. As for the conference, it is unknown what the nature of it is since Mao’s grandson doesn’t hold any known position in the military.
And you don’t think you’re from the other end of the bull spectrum? :diablo:
Who said they were Chinese? All I said was these tels were probably destined for the DF-31A. Everyone knows that a lot of Chinese tels comes usually Russian designs.
What else are you going to be in denial about?
How else are they going to transport it? Some place or another it’s going to transported on a vehicle.
It’s not a tel. It’s just transporting the missile.
Well this is the supposed DF-31A the tel is destined for.
Plenty of pics out there of the tel. The other two are said to be for the DF-31A but some rumours says it’s for the dormant or cancelled DF-41.
Also, in others forums they say if the DF-31 needs a specific area for calibration before launch, then what about the JL-2?
That would be interesting but what are the chances? I’ll say better than the original partnership idea of this thread but still a long shot.