dark light

Rat Acc

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 70 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Typhoon loan to Canada; no transit damage #958477
    Rat Acc
    Participant

    Eeeeee… Way back when I were a mere SAC, my first Warrant, Curly Beauchamp, told me some real tall stories…
    Told me about those “Super-Techs” that the RAF experimented with back in the Cold War, genetically engineered at Porton Down to be superior in every way to all other techies…
    Better, stronger, faster… ( oh, sorry, that was Steve Austin…)
    And because of their superior intellect, only their opinion counted.
    They didn’t need to use Tele-brief on start up or crew in snags, they used telepathy instead.
    And it was said that on helicopter squadrons, they could even tell by the way a gro-bag walked back across the pan as to which main rotor blade was out of balance…

    And I always thought he was pulling my Houchin cable…

    in reply to: Typhoon loan to Canada; no transit damage #958677
    Rat Acc
    Participant

    Sorry Moggy, but it’s ok for him to criticize and grind his axe?

    The RAF Museum have used that transport company many times, before and since the Battle move, seem to recall seeing their trucks moving stuff around during the Milestone of Flight project, don’t recall any reports of any damage back then being reported on here

    in reply to: Typhoon loan to Canada; no transit damage #958705
    Rat Acc
    Participant

    Actually Mr Know-It-All Burke, it wasnt….

    It was due to corroded structure in the mainplanes that wasnt found during its restoration by MAPS…

    So, with regard to the offer in post 79, do you want the inside cabin or the sea view…?

    in reply to: Typhoon loan to Canada; no transit damage #959052
    Rat Acc
    Participant

    And for all those forum members worried about the aircraft during its possible long and perilous sea transit across the North Atlantic…
    I’m sure that the RAF Museum would be happy to make space in the container for yourselves, an Elsan, and a few boxes of M.R.E. :rolleyes:

    In addition to providing free transport to Canada inside the shipboard container (bring your own sleeping bag ), the RAF Museum are also looking for Forum members with large self inflating egos to strap to the outside of the container for use in the event of it going overboard…

    in reply to: Typhoon loan to Canada; no transit damage #960566
    Rat Acc
    Participant

    And for all those forum members worried about the aircraft during its possible long and perilous sea transit across the North Atlantic…
    I’m sure that the RAF Museum would be happy to make space in the container for yourselves, an Elsan, and a few boxes of M.R.E. :rolleyes:

    in reply to: Typhoon loan to Canada; no transit damage #960578
    Rat Acc
    Participant

    I never said there was another one, unless the Yanks have built a repro using the bits they didn’t send back in 68…

    The panels, cowlings and radiator parts made by 27MU Shawbury have fooled a lot of people for a long time.

    in reply to: Typhoon loan to Canada; no transit damage #960632
    Rat Acc
    Participant

    …my concern as such is solely for the well being of this nations only existing complete example of a Hawker Typhoon, should this ‘loan’ actually be going ahead.

    Wyvernfan, suggest you read this, top of page three…

    http://www.rafmuseum.org.uk/documents/collections/74-A-27-Typhoon-MN235-public.pdf

    It’s not a “complete” example at all… it’s a partial repro…

    ” Arrived in UK missing one 20mm cannon, spinner, most engine cowlings, starboard aileron, undercarriage parts, radiator/oil cooler unit, side panels below cockpit and various inspection panels.
    The missing cannon was replaced from RAFM stocks; the spinner was adapted from a HP Hastings spinner and other parts were made by 27 MU. The aircraft was in generally good condition with only slight corrosion.
    Replacement engine cowlings were made from sheet aluminium, and the missing radiator was replaced by a cut-down Bedford lorry unit made to look like the original from the front at least.”

    Had no wartime service, wasn’t even in the country for D-Day, on loan to the Yanks… and the invasion stripes were painted on in 1994 !

    Rat Acc
    Participant

    To paraphrase a quote by a certain Hedley Lamarr…

    I want rustlers, cut throats, modellers, bounty hunters, desperados, mugs, pugs, thugs, nitwits, halfwits, dimwits, vipers, snipers, con men, Indian agents, Mexican bandits…
    Anoraks, cynics, critics, have-beens, wannabees, lamp-swingers, hand-baggers, sand-baggers,
    Rivet-counters, metal-bashers, back-biters, back-stabbers, bushwhackers…
    Hornswogglers, horse thieves, bullsh***ers, been-its, seen-its, done-its,
    train-robbers, bank-robbers, plane-spotters, nit-pickers, hair-splitters, and Forumites… “

    Have I missed anyone out ?:rolleyes:

    in reply to: Westland Wessex #969738
    Rat Acc
    Participant

    Is anyone here ever going to learn about helicopters? 🙂 🙂

    Yep…
    Helicopters don’t fly…
    They’re so ugly the Earth repels them…:dev2:

    in reply to: Lyneham Comet XK699 #972181
    Rat Acc
    Participant

    “a nominal fee…”
    a quick browse on google found this…

    http://www.defenceviewpoints.co.uk/defence-industry/august-uk-mod-contracts-under-1m

    Air Salvage International Ltd, Alton, Hampshire, £100,241, road move of Nimrod XV235 aircraft to Cosford,

    and from what I am led to believe, ASI had to use a jackhammer or similar to get the wing bolts out, and not one of them was re-usable !

    in reply to: Lyneham Comet XK699 #972215
    Rat Acc
    Participant

    [QUOTE=David Burke;2087482]The RAFM is a department of the Mod . I cannot recall any instance where the RAFM has made a request for a transfer of equipment of a historic nature and had it declined. I do not believe for one minute that this aircraft was totally beyone redemption. It spent a very long time in storage at Henlow – efforts to move her or at least carry out more meaningful spares recovery seem to have been missed.
    In terms of the RAFM it seems that an enormous effort was put into recovering the Dornier wreckage whilst funding to move both a Comet and VC-10 seems to have evaporated!

    “The RAFM didnt break promises over the VC10 or the Comet…
    The RAF chose not to deliver 808 by air because of the length of available runway…
    And re the Comet, read my post on that thread, with the info taken from the pprune site.
    The Comet was past its best back in 2009… the RAFM said so then… “

    and Bruce the moderator has stated that he saw various condition survey reports… ask him…

    What axe have you got to grind with the RAF Museum, David ?

    Rat Acc
    Participant

    The RAFM didnt break promises over the VC10 or the Comet…
    The RAF chose not to deliver 808 by air because of the length of available runway…
    And re the Comet, read my post on that thread, with the info taken from the pprune site.
    The Comet was past its best back in 2009… the RAFM said so then…

    in reply to: Lyneham Comet XK699 #972425
    Rat Acc
    Participant

    Here’s a few comments taken from the pprune website post regarging this aircraft, sorry if it’s a bit of a big post but the comments by AMAROK point towards the RAFM saying it was past its use by date as far back as 2009.

    http://www.pprune.org/aviation-history-nostalgia/95212-lyneham-close-what-fate-comet.html

    Amarok
    I am sorry to report the RAF Museum inspected the Saggy autumn 2009, they reported the corrosion in the fuse was too far gone ‘one of the inspectors said he could push his finger through the lower fuse skin ! please remember this aircraft has been parked over grass for nearly 25 years and I suspect she has been slowly rotting from the inside out…
    …The RAFM have removed everything they could from the Comet (Sept 2009) and due to the corrosion were going to scrap it on the spot. It sounds like someone has stepped in and said hang on so the descision has been put on hold, but the early indication from the RAFM is they don’t want Saggy as they have Comet 1X up at Cosford and will equip it with the bits they got from saggy and make it look like a C2.

    SirPeterHardingsLovechild
    I had an outside walk around the Comet this morning and my unqualified opinion is that it is saveable. I didn’t find anywhere in the lower fuselage that I could ‘put my finger through’. The jet pipe cowlings are indeed rotted through. There’s plenty of evidence of intergranular corrosion. The undercarriage main components seem to be okay. Various smaller struts on the undercarriage are badly corroded and would probably need replacing or bracing.

    One of the guys who went on board earlier this year tells me that the insides are in a sorry state. He felt the cabin floor was unsafe, and mistook what he thought was a carpet, that turned out to be a thick layer of mildew/moss.

    T-21
    The nose is about the only part worth saving ,the rest is too corroded. It has been sitting around for nearly 45 years,miracles take longer.

    DaveReidUK
    Here’s the RFQ, from last year, seeking a contractor to dismantle XK699 and reassemble it at Cosford:
    Dismantlement and relocation of Gate Guardian Comet C2 XK699 – Government Tenders, Government News and Information – Government Online

    No info on whether the contract has since been awarded.
    Edit: PQ from April this year:
    “Mr Gray: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what plans he has for the historic Comet aircraft which is at the entrance to the former RAF Lyneham base. [149378]

    Mr Robathan: The RAF are currently examining options for the future of the De Havilland Comet C2 XK699 which is the gate guardian at the former RAF Lyneham. No decision has yet been made.”

    Proplinerman
    Thanks very much for that.
    The dismantling and move tender looks very positive, as do the sums mentioned as to its value/cost: “Contract value: £40,000 – £93,000.” That said however, I know nothing about the costs of dismantling, moving and then re-assembling any aircraft, let alone a large one like a Comet, so perhaps these figures were just too low for any contractor to be seriously interested?
    From the fact that the closing date was April 2012 and that nothing has happened tho, and also given the completely non-committal reply from the Govt minister to the PQ put down on the subject in April of this year, that you quote, I surmise that there were probably no takers for the tender to move the aircraft.

    Rat Acc
    Participant

    Just bumping this back to the front page for those who may not have seen it yesterday.

    Don’t forget, it’s FREE… (ok, gotta pay for car parking, but that’s a small price to pay )

    I think it’s also the IPMS model show at Telford today too…

    Decisions, decisions….:confused:

    in reply to: Bomber Command Memorial wins an award! #977048
    Rat Acc
    Participant

    Put your money where your mouth is then…
    Send them a big cheque, or go to the next MBCC open week and bung a wad of tenners into the donations box.

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 70 total)