Originally posted by Robbo
Stunning photo Mark12 – oh to have been there…
Hmmm…………..saw Don Bullock flying Sally B in such a fashion on several occasions and it was impressive for all the wrong reasons.
Just curious, thanks
Originally posted by brenmcc1
Nice iawn.
Does that mean something in Welsh?
Originally posted by martin_EGTK
We had the EAF chief pilot (Terence Henderson – ex Concorde Captain!) come and give us a talk at OAT last month and all he could talk about was how well the airline was doing and how they were expanding day by day and how bright the future looked and how we should all try and join EAF when we qualify, so not really sure what happened 🙂
Its called aviation, the only sure thing is that nothing is sure. Expect the unexpected and be prepared for the worst!
Originally posted by brenmcc1
Sound fun, but yet challenging
Barra is far less of a problem than many of the Scottish airfields with (short) concrete ruways (Unst, Tingwall etc). Its just like a big grass airfield (if slightly wetter, but NOT soggier, the sand is very firm), land/take-off into wind using the longest ‘runway’ length available.
Windshear is a rapid change in windspeed or direction. The result on the aircraft can be positive (speed gain) or negative (speed loss) or, in the case of a severe microburst, as Bemused says, disastrous.
Vast majority of take offs are made with reduced thrust (no point using full power and only half the runway – use more of the runway and reduce power, good for engine life).
Certain conditions – contaminated runway, unserviceabilities with aircraft braking systems, and probably in this case, windshear, preclude the use of reduced thrust. I had to use full take off thrust at the weekend (wind was 30 gusting 40!), so I would imagine they were doing the same, hence climbing steeper than usual.
As for the Dash 8, can’t really comment, but the smaller the aircraft, the greater the relative effect of the wind – 747 clearly has more mass and inertia than an Islander! The Shorts 360 had a 35 kt crosswind limit (I seem to remember from a previous lifetime), and it was perfectly controllable in those conditions
Originally posted by EAL_KING
is ok i guess i miss the old liver though
So does George Best.
I guess his re-election….so sorry…….morale boosting visit to the troops compares with his heroic Vietnam record.
Originally posted by Whiskey Delta
Just FYI, any USAF aircraft that the President flies in is called Air Force 1. .
Seem to remember Dubya was a little shy of using the ‘Air Force One’ callsign on his heroic two nanosecond visit to Iraq.
Originally posted by dhfan
At the Coventry Airshow a few years back there was a flypast of 9 (I think) Daks. Impressive.
Definitely seven – a very impressive stream take off, followed by two passes of a surprisingly close ‘seven ship’ – fantastic end to the show (now if I could only scan those slides…..)
Prefer the B25, a real aeroplane.
Thanks Robbo & 357, yet more stuff I need to buy.
I’m seriously tempted to say DO NOTHING – it may be a cliche, but it is the timeless atmosphere that makes OW so, so special.
Thinking hard, I can think of little on the operational side that needs changing. My wife has remarked that the standard of the stalls has declined over the years (used to be an excellent gardening stand – you should see our OW mahonia after a decade!)
On a similar theme, I notice that there are two versions of the original (wartime) version of Memphis Belle available on DVD. One is about an hour longer than the other, I presume it to be the better buy – any comments?