dark light

Moondance

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 11 posts - 661 through 671 (of 671 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Ken Ellis Editorial – The Smaller Air Show #2116513
    Moondance
    Participant

    Point taken – but even an average IWM organised Duxford show has a range of historic aircraft that would have been unimaginable 25 years ago – enjoy and never take them for granted.
    As for Waddington, what is the point of having a flying display commencing when most of the audience are still in their cars? I thought last years flying display was typically badly organised – “magnificent 7 hour air display” or something similar the website said. Well, actually about a 5 hour show padded out, with lots of gaps in the programme and empty sky between acts. It should be compulsory for display organisers to attend Flying Legends to see how well run a display can be.

    in reply to: Question for Wysiwyg #742618
    Moondance
    Participant

    BHX ATC have their own website at http://www.egbb.co.uk – worth a look.

    in reply to: Battle of the X-Planes #743399
    Moondance
    Participant

    BA crews referred to the Trident as the “gripper” due to its reluctance to leave the ground. A VTOL Trident, surely a contradiction!
    For a VTOL transport, try the Dornier Do 31

    in reply to: Ken Ellis Editorial – The Smaller Air Show #2117049
    Moondance
    Participant

    To call Duxford displays repetetive is slightly uncharitable. When I started attending airshows, the typical vintage participation was the (correctly) conservatively flown BBMF, RN Swordfish if you were in the south and, well, that was about it. I can vividly remember being gobsmacked the first time I saw a fully aerobatic Hurricane display flown by Stephen Grey.
    Flying Legends is easily the best run flying display in the UK, perfect length at about 3 hours, with a sense of timing and panache that most shows totally lack. Be grateful that the likes of Mr. Grey have enriched our skies with a superb collection of historic aircraft.
    Yes, small is beautiful, but please don’t moan about Duxford.

    in reply to: Question for Wysiwyg #743550
    Moondance
    Participant

    On a 3 degree glideslope, descent is approx 300 ft per nautical mile. So if Walsall is at (say) 10 nm from touchdown on 15 , aircraft will be roughly at 3000ft agl, if following the notional glideslope. If you have a look at http://www.ais.org.uk (you need to register, but it is free) and look at Aerodrome Data in the UK AIP you will see minimum altitude in the Radar Vectoring Area around Walsall is 2500ft, becoming 2000ft shortly afterwards, so traffic could be slightly lower if at the minimum vectoring altitude. As to speed, depends on type and ATC speed requirements – jets would unlikely to be faster than their minimum clean speed (about 210 kts), but almost certainly reducing speed as they turn for the ILS.

    in reply to: Angels One Five #2117586
    Moondance
    Participant

    The Hurricanes used in the film were from the Portugese Air Force – amazing to think that by the early 1950s, there were not enough left in the Uk in airworthy condition.

    in reply to: American Airlines A300 Crash #750042
    Moondance
    Participant
    in reply to: airparks #751843
    Moondance
    Participant

    I know that this is a civil forum, but a trip to AMARC at Davis-Monthan AFB would be worthwhile. http://www.dm.af.mil/AMARC/ is the official site, click on tours. http://www.amarcexperience.com/Default.asp is the unofficial ,but far more comprehensive, site.

    in reply to: Mobiles on Planes – BBC Report #752334
    Moondance
    Participant
    in reply to: Icon Outside #2083914
    Moondance
    Participant

    Much as I love Cosford, I’ve always been concerned by their tendency to obtain a recently retired type, scrap an older example, and then allow the later aquisition to rot away – eg Vulcans 1 & 2, Victors 1 & 2, Varsities, Canberras 8 (OK that one was sold) & 9 etc. It seems short sighted to dispose of an older (and probably rarer) variant, just because a later one becomes available. The Vulcan 2 is now very scruffy – far better have kept (and maintained) the last surviving Vulcan 1.

    in reply to: WHAT MEANS 2nd OFFICER? #758982
    Moondance
    Participant

    First/Second Officer mean exactly whatever the employing airline want it to mean. In my company, First & Second Officers are essentially the same (same training, qualification, flying etc), the thing that separates them is experience (1500 hrs) and more importantly, salary (less for S/O – no surprises there!)
    In the Cathay Cargo case, a S/O would probably be acting as a Cruise Pilot on a B747-400. The normal two crew is augmented by a third pilot to achieve a greater allowed Flying Duty Period. The job would probably involve sitting in either flight deck seat for long peroids in the cruise while other crew take rest, but not being allowed to do take off or landings until fully qualified as a First Officer (but that depends entirely on an airline’s policy, its not a legal thing)

Viewing 11 posts - 661 through 671 (of 671 total)